1-19-2015 The following is not about race or religion, prejudice or discrimination. It is about reality and survival, truth and self-preservation. The facts are well documented. If after reading the information below, you still do not understand what is at stake, I urge you to continue looking for the answers. If you choose to ignore this or turn a blind eye to the threats ahead, just know you were warned. You have been given the knowledge to make an informed choice. What you do from here, falls on your shoulders. What you allow, will continue. ~VCB -The entire country needs to be holding rallies, protests, and demonstrations against the Muslim Brotherhood and the ongoing Islamic infiltration of the United States. Since no one can tell a good Muslim from a bad Muslim, every Islamic/Muslim operation, institution, organization, community takeover, etc. needs to be shut down and the threat eliminated. The Muslim Brotherhood is a radical Islamic political and terrorist organization using the cover of religion. The Muslim Brotherhood has an extensive past with ties to Freemasonry, the British government, and the United States government going back over a century. The Muslim Brotherhood has numerous branches throughout the world and has successfully infiltrated all institutions of society. We must stop all funding going to any and all Islamic ventures in the U.S. Islamic compounds, schools, mosques, religious and political figures and business associates, ALL must be removed from U.S. soil. The legalities of how this is accomplished does NOT matter. The death and destruction of United States of America and all of us is what the near future holds if Islam (the Muslim Brotherhood) is not completely removed. Am I advocating violence? Only if you are in danger and have the duty to protect and defend yourself and all you hold dear. The U.S. federal government is complicit in the advance of the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. From the instillation of Barack H. 0bama to the rapid advance of Islam across the United States of America. Every move has been planned and executed by the highest offices in the land and the shadow elites who control domestic and foreign policy. All of this began decades ago. We are facing a tremendous and deadly danger by allowing Islam to take over infrastructure in the United States. The Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the U.S. federal government- from 0bama and Holder to officials in the armed forces, the U.S. State Department, DHS, IRS, and so on. The United States is being set up for a complete take over by Islamic forces led by the Muslim Brotherhood. We are spiraling into hell on Earth. Only a rapid awareness and counter assault by the American people will save us. We can not remain tolerant and hope for the best. We can not depend on the government or military to protect us. Our country is being conquered from within. Facts dont lie. The evidence is endless. The proof surrounds us and our enemies have admitted their intent. We are in the final stages of their plan. It is now or never.- *People often ask how Islam (the Muslim Brotherhood) fits in with the global elite and their plans for depopulation of the world and world government. The following piece is the most accurate explanation I have come across to date. Its lengthy, but if you take the time to read the entire document many of your questions will be answered. The entire document is fascinating. Ive included the second chapter of part 2 here. This link, along with other important writings, is located below.* II. Creating the Arc of Crisis By the 1970s elitist intellectuals and globalist institutions had focused on population growth and industrial development as two of the most pressing enemies of the human race. The United Nations, the Club of Rome, the Tavistock and Aspen Institutes and many other organizations that served as mouthpieces for the ruling elites all began crying out that the environment was being destroyed and that industrialization was becoming a terrible menace. Technology, science and human progress were falling out of favor. The elites considered the earths resources their possessions and they did not want to share them with an emerging and developing Third World. Lord Bertrand Russell was one of the most important of these anti-human humanists who advocated a return to the dark ages. He believed that, The white population of the world will soon cease to increase. The Asiatic races will be longer, and the negroes still longer, before their birth rate falls sufficiently to make their numbers stable without help of war and pestilence. Until that happens, the benefits aimed at by socialism can only be partially realized, and the less prolific races will have to defend themselves by methods which are disgusting even if they are necessary. Russell was also an advocate for world government, I have already spoken of the population problem, but a few words must be added about its political aspect. .... It will be impossible to feel that the world is in a satisfactory state until there is a certain degree of equality, and a certain acquiescence everywhere in the power of the World Government, and this will not be possible until the poorer nations of the world have become ... more or less stationary in population. The conclusion to which we are driven by the facts that we have been considering is that, while great wars cannot be avoided until there is a World Government, a World Government cannot be stable until every important country has nearly stationary population. For Russell, population control was a prerequisite to World Government. (1) As far back as 1947, a leading Australian scientist was suggesting, in a secret report to the Australian Defence Department, that ...the most effective counter-offensive to threatened invasion by overpopulated Asiatic countries would be directed towards the destruction by biological or chemical means of tropical food crops and the dissemination of infectious disease capable of spreading in tropical, but not under Australian, conditions. This archetypical mad scientist was Sir Frank MacFarlane Burnet, knighted by the British crown in 1951, and winner of a Nobel Prize in 1960. (2) In 1968 Stanford biologist and Bertrand Russell admirer Paul Ehrlich wrote the best-selling book The Population Bomb. He wrote, A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people.... We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions. In his book he advocated placing birth control chemicals into the worlds food supplies. (3) Sir Julian Huxley, the British scientist and intellectual who played a leading part in creating the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), held much the same views. He saw scientific advancement, such as penicillin, DDT and water purification, as a two-edged sword. He wrote, We can and should devote ourselves with truly religious devotion to the cause of ensuring greater fulfillment for the human race in its future destiny. And this involves a furious and concerted attack on the problem of population; for the control of population is…a prerequisite for any radical improvement in the human lot. (4) Huxleys extremist views have remained within the United Nations and they were showcased in the worlds first Earth Summit, the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment in 1972. Maurice Strong was chosen to put together this conference by UN Secretary General U Thant, and the next year Strong was put in charge of the newly created UN Environment Program. 1972 was also the year in which the Club of Rome published their infamous report Limits To Growth. This report, backed by research done by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, basically concluded that industrialization had to be halted to save the planet from ecological catastrophe. Since then even the Clubs most loyal admirers, such as Maurice Strong, have admitted that the report was premature, and didnt take into account advances in technology. (5) The Club of Rome has been one of the most influential groups promoting world government since it was created in 1970 by Dr. Alexander King, a British scientist and diplomat, and Arelio Peccei the Italian industrialist. In 1973 the Club published a report entitled Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System, that presented a model of a one world government system sub-divided into ten regions. The Aspen Institute is another important globalist think tank. It was established in 1949 by three Chicagoans: a businessman, the president of the University of Chicago and one of his professors. The University of Chicago was founded with Rockefeller money, and the Aspen Institute has always existed within the Rockefeller sphere of influence. One of the high points of the history of the Aspen Institute was a conference on Technology: Social Goals and Cultural Options in 1970 that paved the way for the UNs Earth Summit in Stockholm in 1972. The World Wildlife Fund is another elitist racist institution that masquerades as a humanitarian environmentalist organization. It was created by Prince Phillip of England, the husband of the Queen. He is on record as saying that if he is reincarnated he would like to return as a killer virus, to help solve the overpopulation problem. Since then other WWF executives have voiced the same concerns about overpopulation. (6) Dr. Arne Schiotz, a WWF director has said, Malthus has been vindicated, reality is finally catching up with Malthus. The Third World is overpopulated, its an economic mess, and theres no way they could get out of it with this fast-growing population. Our philosophy is: back to the village. Sir Peter Scott, former chairman of the WWF warned, If we look at things causally, the bigger problem in the world is population. We must set a ceiling to human numbers. All development aid should be made dependent on the existence of strong family planning programs. Thomas Lovejoy, a former vice-president of WWF put it bluntly, The biggest problems are the damn national sectors of these developing countries. These countries think that they have the right to develop their resources as they see fit. They want to become powers. These repressive views are held even by some of the most important managers of the global financial institutions. Fritz Lutweiler, the chairman of the Bank for International Settlements (the world banking headquarters), has said, It means the reduction of real income in countries where the majority of the population is already living at the minimum existence level or even under it. That is difficult, but one cannot spare the highly indebted countries this difficult path. It is unavoidable. (7) Robert McNamara, the president of the World Bank warned, There are only two possible ways in which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly. Or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way. There are, of course, many ways in which the death rates can go up. In a thermonuclear age, war can accomplish it very quickly and decisively. Famine and disease are natures ancient checks on population growth, and neither one has disappeared from the scene.... To put it simply: Excessive population growth is the greatest single obstacle to the economic and social advancement of most of the societies in the developing world. (8) Ultimately these views became accepted within the American foreign policy establishment. In 1974 Secretary of State Henry Kissinger submitted National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) entitled, Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. The conclusion: World population growth is widely recognized within the Government as a current danger of the highest magnitude calling for urgent measures.... There is a major risk of severe damage [from continued rapid population growth] to world economic, political, and ecological systems and, as these systems begin to fail, to our humanitarian values. NSSM 200 was to have been made public in 1979, but it was successfully kept under wraps until 1989. During his career Kissinger made sure that population control remained a cornerstone of his foreign policy strategy, and after him his ideological partner Zbigniew Brzezinski pushed the same agenda in the Carter administration. Both are closely connected with the Rockefeller family, and both had studied under Harvards William Yandell Elliott, the Oxford-trained British-allied professor. The WorldWatch Institute was created in 1974, during the same time that NSSM 200 was being promoted in Americas foreign policy establishment, with a grant from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Since 1984 its annual State of the World publication is always highlighted by the media, and its hundreds of alarmist pseudo-scientific papers and reports have been used as ammunition in the leftist and elitist war against industrialization ever since. As we related in Part One of this study, the first attack on the Third World came in the form of a premeditated massive rise in oil prices in connection with the Yom Kippur war of 1973. Economies cannot develop without an energy supply, and the quadrupling of energy prices was a major setback to nations like India, Brazil, Pakistan, Indonesia and Mexico. Then when President Bhutto of Pakistan tried to work around the situation by developing nuclear energy Kissinger threatened him saying, We will make an example of you! (9) The Shah of Iran, even though his nation had an abundant supply of oil, also began a program to develop nuclear energy. Both leaders were quickly eliminated. With the rise in energy prices the development of the Third World was checked, but the Arab Middle East became greatly enriched. This was when the Globalists turned to their allies, the Islamists, to remedy the situation. Islam would be used to attack industrialization and modernization using the lie that human progress was un-Islamic and a Western plot against the servants of Allah. The real plot was actually aimed at the brown-skinned masses of the Middle East who were briefly experiencing a positive change in their quality of life in terms of education, employment, shelter, sanitation and nutrition. However the religious and intellectual advocates of ignorance, filth and violence joined forces to throw the prosperous Middle East back into the dark ages. In England the Islamic Foundation was set up as a branch of the Jamaat-e Islami by Professor Kurshid Ahmad in Leicester in 1973. When General Zia took over Pakistan he appointed Ahmad to serve as his Minister of Economics.(10) Also in 1973 the Islamic Council of Europe was created with headquarters in London. The Councils long-time Secretary General was a prominent Muslim Brother by the name of Salem Azzam, who we will return to later. (11) Another project was Islam and the West, begun at Cambridge in 1977 with Muslim Brother and former Syrian prime minister Maarouf Dawalibi in collaboration with the Club of Romes Peccei and Britains Lord Caradon, along with Dr. Alexander Kings International Federation of Advanced Study. Islam and the West assembled a policy outline effectively defining Islam as a backwards religion in a struggle with science and technology. The Globalists were determined to promote only the repressive anti-Western minority version of Islam and the Muslim Brotherhood was the key to selling this view to the world. (12) In Iran members of the Aspen Institute and the Club of Rome linked up directly with the ideological opponents of the Shahs regime in Iran. Ali Shariati, Abolhassan Bani-Sadr and many of the leading educators in Irans universities were brought into their circle of influence. The Globalists destabilization campaign against the Shah is documented in Robert Dreyfuss book Hostage To Khomeini, of which a portion can be read here at the website dedicated to Irans former prime minister Amir Abbas Hoveyda. Crucial to the overthrow of the Shah was the Iranian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood known as the Fedayeen-e Islam, which had been set up in the 1940s. It was led by the fanatical Ayatollah Khalkali, and the Ayatollah Khomeini was a longtime member. The students who took over the American embassy in Tehran after the overthrow of the Shah, taking scores of American hostages, were also members of the Fedayeen-e Islam. Khalkali was able to personally exercise his political power during the Iranian revolution when he presided as judge in the trials of thousands of political prisoners, sentencing the majority of them to death. (12a) The Fedayeen-e Islam also controlled Irans opium production and drug smuggling network which, near the end of the Shahs reign, had become increasingly threatened by the Shahs largely successful anti-dope campaign. After Khomeini took over Khalkali was cynically made head of Irans national anti-drug program and under his watch opium production skyrocketed. According to Khomeinis rulings, since collected and translated into English, Wine and all other intoxicating beverages are impure, but opium and hashish are not. (12b) In Pakistan the Muslim Brotherhood in the form of the Jamaat-e Islami supported the overthrow of Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto by General Zia ul-Haq. Bhutto was hated by the British globalists for withdrawing Pakistan from the British Commonwealth, for implementing nationalistic policies, for leaning towards the Soviets and for seeking to develop nuclear energy. When General Zia announced a death sentence on the imprisoned Bhutto his sentence was officially protested by the heads of state from fifty-four countries. Zia went ahead and executed Bhutto in 1979 only after receiving assurances from the head of the Jamaat-e Islami that the execution would not lead to internal unrest.(13) In the years that followed the Jamaat-e Islami became Zias most important backer and the nation was forced into a brutal process of Islamization. In Afghanistan the CIA, prodded on by British Intelligence, began to fund the Islamic opponents of the pro-Soviet regime even prior to the Soviet invasion. President Carters National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brezinski advocated the subversion in order to provoke the Soviet invasion that occurred on December 24, 1979.(14) General Zia and the Jamaat-e Islami in Pakistan were two crucial elements that made the mujahedin revolt in Afghanistan successful. Their takeover of Pakistan was a necessary part of the plan to pull the Soviets into the Afghan conflict. As related in Part One, an Afghan warlord affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood by the name of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar emerged as the primary recipient of American military aid, despite his well known anti-Western views and his radical view of Islam. (When the US Congress finally acted to put an end to this aid it was already too late. Hekmatyar reached the pinnacle of his success in 1993-1994 and also in 1996 when he served as Afghanistans prime minister. He was eventually driven out of Afghanistan by the Taliban but today he is back, agitating against the new government of Hamid Karzai. In May of 2002 the British took it upon themselves to patrol the area where Hekmatyar was based in Operation Buzzard. The stated goal was the suppression of Hekmatyars forces, but Hekmatyar remains at large and his forces have been suspected in recent terrorist bombings in Kabul. Perhaps the stated goal of Operation Buzzard was not the real goal.) In Egypt the Muslim Brotherhood experienced a resurgence after President Sadat began to loosen restrictions against the organization in the early 70s. Publicly the Muslim Brotherhood attempted to soften its image into that of a moderate Islamic organization, but behind the scenes it spawned off a number of violent extremist groups. Islamic Jihad, the Islamic Group and Takfir wal Hejra are just a few of the interlinked terrorist groups that began to agitate more openly against Sadat after he signed the historic Camp David peace agreement with Israel in 1978. Militants associated with these groups assassinated Sadat in 1981 and martial law was declared as the new leader, President Mubarak, launched a vigorous crackdown on the Islamists. In Syria the Muslim Brotherhood revolted against the Assad regime and took over the city of Hamah. The Syrian governments siege against the Brotherhood stronghold lasted for three weeks. 6,000 soldiers and 24,000 civilians were killed in the intense fighting and in the aftermath 10,000 more residents were arrested and placed in internment camps. Afterwards the Syrian government showed evidence that the Muslim Brotherhood forces had been armed by the West. This explosion of violence throughout the Middle East in the late 70s and early 80s was referred to by Zbigniew Brzezinski as the Arc of Crisis. It was not something that occurred by chance, but was in fact the result of the deliberate plan developed by the Globalist strategists such as Dr. Alexander King, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and British operative Dr. Bernard Lewis. The Middle Eastern Arc of Crisis was not a spontaneous internal conflagration, it was something that came about as a result of Western policy in league with the Muslim Brotherhood. Without help from the West radical Islam would have remained the illegitimate, repressive minority movement that it has always been, and the Middle East would have remained stable and prosperous. redmoonrising/Ikhwan/MB.htm An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America (link to full document included below) by Mohamed Akram May 19, 1991 Summary: This May 1991 memo was written by Mohamed Akram, a.k.a. Mohamed Adlouni, for the Shura Council of the Muslim Brotherhood. In the introductory letter, Akram referenced a long-term plan…approved and adopted by the Shura Council in 1987 and proposed this memo as a supplement to that plan and requested that the memo be added to the agenda for an upcoming Council meeting. Appended to the document is a list of all Muslim Brotherhood organizations in North America as of 1991. Notable quotes: Enablement of Islam in North America, meaning: establishing an effective and stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood which adopts Muslims causes domestically and globally, and which works to expand the observant Muslim base, aims at unifying and directing Muslims efforts, presents Islam as a civilization alternative, and supports the global Islamic state, wherever it is. In order for Islam and its Movement to become a part of the homeland in which it lives, stable in its land, rooted in the spirits and minds of its people, enabled in the live [sic] of its society and has firmly-established organizations on which the Islamic structure is built and with which the testimony of civilization is achieved, the Movement must plan and struggle to obtain the keys and the tools of this process in carry [sic] out this grand mission as a Civilization Jihadist responsibility which lies on the shoulders of Muslims and – on top of them – the Muslim Brotherhood in this country. Page 21 of the pdf full document in the link below- The process of settlement is a Civilization-Jihadist Proecess with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Gods religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslims destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal. Page 22- 7- The conviction that the success of the settlement of Islam and its Movement in this country is a success to the global Islamic Movement and a true support for the sought-after state, God willing. Full document with English version on pages 15-32. investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/20.pdf investigativeproject.org/document/id/20 Islamic Village Planned for Dallas, Texas - The Islamic Village Project Please read the following article on the Muslim “No-Go” zones around the world and then go to the Islamic Village Project that is posted further on down the page. This Islamic Village is to be built in Dallas, Texas. Is this Islamic Village to be a type of “No-Go” zone built right here in the United States? Then there is the issue of the Gulen-Turkish-Cosmos Foundation-Harmony Charter Schools that are using our tax dollars to indoctrinate our American children. Some people may think that studying about Islam, the Muslims, and the Arabic language (and culture) is similar to studying Spanish, French, or German; but these people groups have not declared war on Americans, have not been involved in countless bomb plots and terrorist activities, did not fly their planes into tall buildings killing nearly 3000 innocent Americans, did not kill 13 people at Ft. Hood, have not taken over Egypt and Turkey, and do not have a Muslim Brotherhood that is stealthily infusing itself into every part of our American culture. Please take the time to read my 8.1.11 article, “Gulen-Led Coup — Turkey Falls to Islamists.” The U. S. media has not even reported yet on this takeover of Turkey by the Islamists, but the media in Europe and in the Middle East has. Unfortunately, many Americans, particularly in the media, are still “asleep” to the growing threat of Islam: European ‘No-Go’ Zones for Non-Muslims Proliferating “Occupation Without Tanks or Soldiers” by Soeren Kern Islamic extremists are stepping up the creation of “no-go” areas in European cities that are off-limits to non-Muslims. Many of the “no-go” zones function as microstates governed by Islamic Sharia law. Host-country authorities effectively have lost control in these areas and in many instances are unable to provide even basic public aid such as police, fire fighting and ambulance services. The “no-go” areas are the by-product of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged Muslim immigrants to create parallel societies and remain segregated rather than become integrated into their European host nations. In Britain, for example, a Muslim group called Muslims Against the Crusades has launched acampaign to turn twelve British cities – including what it calls “Londonistan” – into independent Islamic states. The so-called Islamic Emirates would function as autonomous enclaves ruled by Islamic Sharia law and operate entirely outside British jurisprudence. The Islamic Emirates Project names the British cities of Birmingham, Bradford, Derby, Dewsbury, Leeds, Leicester, Liverpool, Luton, Manchester, Sheffield, as well as Waltham Forest in northeast London and Tower Hamlets in East London as territories to be targeted for blanket Sharia rule. In the Tower Hamlets area of East London (also known as the Islamic Republic of Tower Hamlets), for example, extremist Muslim preachers, called the Tower Hamlets Taliban, regularly issue death threats to women who refuse to wear Islamic veils. Neighborhood streets have been plastered with posters declaring “You are entering a Sharia controlled zone: Islamic rules enforced.” And street advertising deemed offensive to Muslims is regularly vandalized or blacked out with spray paint. In the Bury Park area of Luton, Muslims have been accused of “ethnic cleansing” by harassing non-Muslims to the point that many of them move out of Muslim neighborhoods. In the West Midlands, two Christian preachers have been accused of “hate crimes” for handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of Birmingham. In Leytonstone in east London, the Muslim extremist Abu Izzadeen heckled the former Home Secretary John Reid by saying: “How dare you come to a Muslim area.” In France, large swaths of Muslim neighborhoods are now considered “no-go” zones by French police. At last count, there are 751 Sensitive Urban Zones (Zones Urbaines Sensibles, ZUS), as they are euphemistically called. A complete list of the ZUS can be found on a French government website, complete with satellite maps and precise street demarcations. An estimated 5 million Muslims live in the ZUS, parts of France over which the French state has lost control. Muslim immigrants are taking control of other parts of France too. In Paris and other French cities with high Muslim populations, such as Lyons, Marseilles and Toulouse, thousands of Muslims are closing off streets and sidewalks (and by extension, are closing down local businesses and trapping non-Muslim residents in their homes and offices) to accommodate overflowing crowds for Friday prayers. Some mosques have also begun broadcasting sermons and chants of “Allahu Akbar” via loudspeakers into the streets. The weekly spectacles, which have been documented by dozens of videos posted on Youtube (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here), and which have been denounced as an “occupation without tanks or soldiers,” have provoked anger and disbelief. But despite many public complaints, local authorities have declined to intervene because they are afraid of sparking riots. In the Belgian capital of Brussels (which is 20% Muslim), several immigrant neighborhoods have become “no-go” zones for police officers, who frequently are pelted with rocks by Muslim youth. In the Kuregem district of Brussels, which often resembles an urban war zone, police are forced to patrol the area with two police cars: one car to carry out the patrols and another car to prevent the first car from being attacked. In the Molenbeek district of Brussels, police have been ordered not to drink coffee or eat a sandwich in public during the Islamic month of Ramadan. In Germany, Chief Police Commissioner Bernhard Witthaut, in an August 1 interview with the newspaper Der Westen, revealed that Muslim immigrants are imposing “no-go” zones in cities across Germany at an alarming rate. The interviewer asked Witthaut: “Are there urban areas – for example in the Ruhr – districts and housing blocks that are “no-go areas,” meaning that they can no longer be secured by the police?” Witthaut replied: “Every police commissioner and interior minister will deny it. But of course we know where we can go with the police car and where, even initially, only with the personnel carrier. The reason is that our colleagues can no longer feel safe there in twos, and have to fear becoming the victim of a crime themselves. We know that these areas exist. Even worse: in these areas crimes no longer result in charges. They are left ‘to themselves.’ Only in the worst cases do we in the police learn anything about it. The power of the state is completely out of the picture.” In Italy, Muslims have been commandeering the Piazza Venezia in Rome for public prayers. In Bologna, Muslims repeatedly have threatened to bomb the San Petronio cathedral because it contains a 600-year-old fresco inspired by Dante’s Inferno which depicts Mohammed being tormented in hell. In the Netherlands, a Dutch court ordered the government to release to the public a politically incorrect list of 40 “no-go” zones in Holland. The top five Muslim problem neighborhoods are in Amsterdam, Rotterdam and Utrecht. The Kolenkit area in Amsterdam is the number one Muslim “problem district” in the country. The next three districts are in Rotterdam – Pendrecht, het Oude Noorden and Bloemhof. The Ondiep district in Utrecht is in the fifth position, followed by Rivierenwijk (Deventer), Spangen (Rotterdam), Oude Westen (Rotterdam), Heechterp/ Schieringen (Leeuwarden) and Noord-Oost (Maastricht). In Sweden, which has some of the most liberal immigration laws in Europe, large swaths of the southern city of Malmö – which is more than 25% Muslim – are “no-go” zones for non-Muslims. Fire and emergency workers, for example, refuse to enter Malmö’s mostly Muslim Rosengaard district without police escorts. The male unemployment rate in Rosengaard is estimated to be above 80%. When fire fighters attempted to put out a fire at Malmö’s main mosque, they were attacked by stone throwers. In the Swedish city of Gothenburg, Muslim youth have been hurling petrol bombs at police cars. In the city’s Angered district, where more than 15 police cars have been destroyed, teenagers have also been pointing green lasers at the eyes of police officers, some of whom have been temporarily blinded. In Gothenburg’s Backa district, youth have been throwing stones at patrolling officers. Gothenburg police have also been struggling to deal with the problem of Muslim teenagers burning cars and attacking emergency services in several areas of the city. According to the Malmö-based Imam Adly Abu Hajar: “Sweden is the best Islamic state.” Islamic Village- More than thirty years ago, the Islamic Association of North Texas (IANT) was established to serve the local Muslim community. Since then, our community has grown considerably, and so have our needs. As we inaugurate our next quarter-century in North Texas, we introduce a novel community idea: the Islamic Village Project, a Muslim neighborhood.” Project Overview The Islamic Village Project is a multi-million dollar project that will foster great change in the Muslim community of Dallas. It will house a senior center, Youth center, Social Services department, residential quarters, play area for the children, retail center, clinic, and a separate building for IQA and Suffa Islamic Seminary classes. The project will extend from the currentMasjid facility at Abrams, on the North and South side of Spring Valley across from the masjid, and West towards Greenville. Educational Complex One of the cornerstones of the Islamic Village will be it Educational Complex housing our IANTQuranic Academy and Suffa Islamic Seminary under the leadership of Imam Yusuf Ziya Kavakci. In addition, the Educational Complex is expected to have a Youth Center, Day Care Facilities, and playground areas for children of all ages. Revenue The Village aims to be a self-sufficient neighborhood. One of the key attributes of the Islamic Village project is its large and sprawling retail and office complex. It is anticipated that this retail/office complex will consist of four multi story buildings providing prime frontage for retail and inside space for offices. Together these buildings will provide more than 60,000 Sq. ft. of lease space. IANT plans to use this complex as a base for its future WAQF. This will go well towards reaching our goal of developing revenue generating projects as part of the Islamic Village which will bring over $1 Million in income to IANT each year. archives.voicesempower/islamic-village-planned-for-dallas-texas/
Posted on: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:14:27 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015