A major scientific discovery 《new atomic model》 1.what is - TopicsExpress



          

A major scientific discovery 《new atomic model》 1.what is the new atomic model? How does the new atomic model come into being?2 .What can it do? How does the new atomic model understand the nature? 3.Which distinctive characteristics does it have?4.And which height of the scientific theories does it enable us to achieve? 1. what is the new atomic model? How does the new atomic model come into being? The Physical Master Feynman once said: If all scientific knowledge would be destroyed a particular disaster, and only one sentence could be passed to the next generation, then what sentence can express maximum information by using the least amount of words? The author believes it is the atomic hypothesis, namely, everything in the universe is composed of atoms, atoms are small particles and they are in unceasing movement, when they are separated by a small distance, they will attract each other, but they are in mutual repulsion when being pushed to the pile. However, when entering into internal atom to investigate the motion law of electrons, only to find there are three fatal weaknesses in the atomic model. 1: The atom is constituted by positively charged atomic nuclei in the center of the atom and the negatively charged electrons outside the nuclei. As the anisotropy charges attract each other, why a proton and an electron can’t gather together? 2: There are a number of protons in nuclei with positive charges, why they are not in repulsion? 3: What makes the negatively charged electrons remain together? This also means that it is impossible for such atoms exist stably theoretically. protons, neutrons in theoretical, but it is not correct, there’s everything in the universe with no exception of atoms, which are stable and supported by a large number of experiments and the entire chemical field. (Quoted from The Feynmans Lectures on Physics) If the atom is composed of electrons, protons, neutrons, then according to the nature of the isotropy repulsion, anisotropy attract of the electricity. The isotropy particles will automatically be separated under the repulsion, and the anisotropy particles are under mutual attraction, which results in the separation of isotropy particles due to repulsion, and aggregation of anisotropy particles due to gravitation, the result will be the electron submerged in the nuclear because of gravity. Since the forces of nature make electron submerged into the nucleus, why not see what in the end will happen after the electron submerged into the nucleus naturally? With the attraction of anisotropy particles, the electrons will fall into the nucleus and become the neutrons with the combination of protons. According to a large number of modern experiments, the neutron is with the spin motion and two poles of both South, and North. As a neutron is with two poles of both South and North, there will naturally be the forces of attraction and repulsion between the two neutrons. There will be the forces between two particles once the neutron began rotary motion, the forces are cycling field force due to the alternating attraction and repulsion. The two particles will be automatically separated under the repulsion, but not far for their separation, the cycling field force has been converted to attraction, which again pulls back the separated particles. However, the cycling field force is converted to repulsion spontaneously prior to their connection, and once again the repulsion pushes the two particles back to equilibrium position. Under the action of cycling field force, the two particles won’t be separated too far, neither will it be aggregated closely, instead the two particles are always around an equilibrium distance L0 spontaneously to do the unceasing separation and aggregation motion, thus automatically establish a relatively stable dynamic connection by separation and aggregation motion switching in order. Under the role of cycling field force, a certain number of neutrons will spontaneously form an atom with specific structures and functions. With the increased number of the neutrons, structures and properties of the elements will show periodic changes along with increment atomic numbers. Experiments show that there is still magnetic moment in atoms. However, due to the number of neutrons is varied in different atoms, the corresponding internal structures are also different, together with different cycling magnetic field generated outwardly, which leads to different equilibrium distances of L1, L2 and L3 formed by different atoms when establishing connection spontaneously. If a large number of atoms were gathered to constitute a solid, it’s obviously that the atoms would have an infinite numbers of different arrangements, however, as the atoms always maintain in the equilibrium distance L spontaneously under the role of cycling field force, which thus determines each atom won’t be in random arrangement during the self-organizing, instead they will arrange regularly in different directions of space according to different lengths of equilibrium distance L in spontaneous, thus to form a changing and colorful universe. 2 .What can it do?How does the new atomic model understand the nature? When we follow the nature, the electron will fall into nucleus. This also means that electrons will disappear accordingly. 1. How does the light generate without electrons? 2. How to explain the electricity? How is the chemical reaction? 3. How does everything generate, act and change without electronics? To tell the truth, the author was then not too sure about the above questions, so the author picked up the college textbooks and learned a lot of knowledge accordingly, and the author also drew some affirmative or negative answers. It’s sure that: 1.The classical electrodynamics is still correct without electrons. 2.Those empirical formula and laws in physics from a large number of experiments are still valid without electrons. 3.It can be better for humans to know about the nature without electrons. However, the author does not know whether these inferences drawn from the new atomic models are justified. Therefore, the author dares to write them down to discuss with other researchers. writing process I discovered; The new atomic model can help us to solve the power source problem of the origin of everything in the universe as well as its changes and motion power source through the nature of substance itself, once the power source problem was solved, then it’s easy for us to know causes and laws of origin of everything in the universe together with the corresponding changes and motion. The author mainly follows the following the ideas below when analyzing a variety of natural phenomena: Understand the magnetic field produced by the respective state (such as atomic structure, motion status, etc.) microscopic particles. Analyze the forces naturally generate between particles by the magnetic field. Understand the force between the particles will be possible for us to further understand the natural motion of substances. Understand the force between the particles will be possible for us to further understand the natural generation of substances. Understand the changes of the force between the particles will be possible for us to further understand the natural change of substances. Understand the force between the particles will be possible for us to further understand the law dynamic equilibrium principle followed by substances during motion, generation and changes. Due to the total effect amount of the attraction and repulsion generated spontaneously by atoms are equal, but the two forces are in the opposite direction of effect, which determines the atoms generally remain a state of dynamic equilibrium in the general division cycle and remain in a cycle of separation and aggregation. Therefore, the dynamic equilibrium principle refers to: under the action of the cycling field force, the substances always develop spontaneously from the relatively unstable state to the most stable dynamic equilibrium relative to the external conditions. 3.Which characteristics does it have? The new atomic model can help us to solve the power source problem of the origin of everything in the universe as well as its changes and motion power source through the nature of substance itself, once the power source problem was solved, then it’s not only able to answer the questions of what (is) and ( how), and it can also answer the question of (why). The new atomic model can help us to solve the power source problem of the origin of everything in the universe as well as its changes and motion power source through the nature of substance itself, once the power source problem was solved, The new atomic model can help us to understand the nature with the causal relationship, which makes our understanding of the nature to be with reliability, certainty, universality and necessity. Human knowledge is able to withstand long-term, extensive practice tests and rational criticism. There are no other reasons for all things in universe to act, generate and change naturally in addition to interactions occurring naturally between the substances. It’s unnecessary to find other reasons for those things in the universe beyond the physical world. Nature is not as complicated as we imagine, instead it is simpler for further in-depth studies. Micro and macro do not like what have been imagined by people, actually they follow different rules. The macro and micro have followed the same simple basic principles, and there are inevitable causal links between the macro and micro. 4.which height of the scientific theories does it enable us to achieve? What is even more unexpected is that when using the new atomic models to analyze a variety of natural phenomena, the author discovered: during the natural generation, motion, development and change of material systems; 1) reasons for changes, 2) purposes of changes, 3) the orientation of development, 4) demonstrated behaviors, 5) the state at any time, 6) the followed laws, are all carried out by around the sentence spontaneous development from relatively unstable state to the dynamic equilibrium state with relatively most stable internal and external conditions. Of course, it is currently just an immature view of the author, although the author can’t absolutely guarantee that this conclusion is correct, herewith, only after the behavior, state, the purpose, reason, the development orientation and the law of substances are seen to be unified that the substances won’t move, organize and change in chaos, and then the nature will show the coordinated order as it often acts in this way, it’s in this form forever. Here are just the findings only, if all things in the universe are really composed of a particle of neutrons. Then, the material world constituted by one kind of elementary particles would have intrinsic unity. Unity in diversity of the material world will be built on the basis of such one. We may through this one to gather various natural sciences divided together to create a unified theoretical system. Realistically, at the beginning of writing this book the author is just simply to prove: We may have a better understanding of the nature without electrons. The author never expected to build anything about the unified theory, but with the in-depth research, this view has been gradually clear. Since the new atomic model explicitly tells: It’s OK. There is nothing to conceal here, the author can only tell the truth, what the new atomic model can do and what it can’t do, what are its shortcomings and problems; all will be told by the author truly. The new atomic model can help us to create a unified theoretical system. Based on the principle of who proposes the proof, It requires us to offer a reasonable explanation for all natural phenomena (including artificial experiments) that are simple and easy to be understood, really reliable, naturally unified, and consistent with the objective reality. However, faced with the endless changes of the natural phenomenon, it is far beyond the author’s ability to do the corresponding research thoroughly with the limited knowledge and energy of his own. Herewith, what the author can do is to make the greatest efforts to do preparatory work for the establishment of a unified theory。 herewith, the author only discusses about the infinite natural phenomena through the finite natural phenomena by the way of answering a limited number of questions, namely, it is readers business to list some natural phenomena with representative significance, then the author will answer these questions in the third part. As for the, Natural science each,I need to answer a few questions?, To answer that question? thats really up to you to decide. create a unified theoretical system. When we adapt to nature, the electronic will fall into the nucleus. This also means that the electrons will disappear. However, due to the denial of the existence of electrons, this will have a profound change for every theory of natural sciences, and it will fundamentally change our view of the universe, therefore we can’t make hasty and irresponsible conclusion before there is any comprehensive full argument. New channels of natural scientific theory is completely different from the model of first demolition of old houses to build a new house, if the old one was removed, and the new has not yet built up, then it will make us fallen into chaotic situation of what is right and what is wrong. In addition, if the new theory itself is originally wrong, or we make mistakes in direction, then it will lead us to consider the fallacy as truth, resulting in even more astray. In order to put our scientific theories to be built on a more solid and more infallible basis, herewith, the author aims at carrying out the discussion in accordance with the following seven steps. And the author will talk about some of his own real thoughts. 1.Learn what is the new atomic model? How does the new atomic model come into being? Which distinctive characteristics does it have? What can it do? How does the new atomic model understand the nature? And which height of the scientific theories does it enable us to achieve? 2. Carry out open, free, comprehensive critiques on new atomic models. 3. To investigate whether the evidence and reason for electronic exists is established? 4. Through comprehensive comparison of new and old atomic models in astronomy, geography, physics, chemistry, biology, optical, electrical and other natural subjects, the author has investigated whether it can be better for us to understand the nature without any electronics? 5. Do some preparatory work on philosophical level for establishing a unified system of scientific theories. 6. To remove barriers for establishing a unified system of scientific theories. 7. Establish a unified system of scientific theories. Second steps. Carry out open, free, comprehensive critiques on new atomic models. As Kant said: Our time can be called as a critical time, namely, nothing can escape from this criticism, the religion attempts to hide behind gods, and the legal attempts to hide behind the dignity, resulting in the suspicion of people accordingly and people lose respect for them, because only the freedom withstand rationality, and things withstand the public checking can won the respect of the so called rationality. The purpose for the author to upload this book is to accept free criticism in public. Therefore, the readers can try their best to carry out any criticism of the book freely from the following aspects: 1. Whether there’s any problem in the new atomic model itself? 2.Whether it will give rise to a series of problems that can’t be solved by human beings? 3.How it is to analyze various kinds of natural phenomena? Whether there’s any error in the aspect of understanding methods? 4. Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is only superficial interpretation of natural phenomena, rather than the further interpretation of them? 5.Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is clear or obscure? Or the author does not understand well about some of some questions? Under the premise of without full understanding, it will also be difficult for the author himself to explain some phenomena clearly, while how should the readers figure out the true meanings if the author failed to explain a certain phenomenon clearly? 6.Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is Abstract? Or the Concrete? 7.Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is Complex? Or the Simple? 8.Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is transcendent? Or it is within the scope of the experience? 9.Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is Violation of logic? Or the Logical? 10.Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is Contrary to common sense? Or the Common sense? 11.Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is inconsistent? Or it is consistent? 12 .Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is Stultify oneself? Or the No contradiction? 13.Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is confusing and skeptical? Or it is convincing? 14.Whether the interpretation of natural phenomena is consistent with the truth of the nature? 15.Whether it can only answer the questions of what and how, rather than why? 16.Whether it can make a uniform interpretation of all natural phenomena and artificial tests? Or it will only explain parts of them? 17.Whether it can make a uniform interpretation of all natural phenomena and artificial tests? Or different explanations will be adopted according to different phenomena? 18.It is to make interference with the use of causal relationship? Or the inference is just with occasional sense? 19.Whether any absurd conclusions can be deduced from the book? 20.The derived conclusion is certainty? Or it is uncertainty? 21.Whether the book can result in a huge gap between the theoretical data and experimental data? 22.Or whether there’s the real and reliable experimental verification for the prediction? 23.Whether the given image of the universe is consistent with our observations? 24.The world is knowable?Or the Unknown? 25.Micro and macro is follow different rules? Or The follow simple basic principles? 26. there are inevitable causal links between the macro and micro? 27.Whether the obtained knowledge through them is universal and inevitable? 28 .Whether the book is withstand the widespread and long-term test of practice by human? 29.The criticisms of other aspects Anyway, the author always believes only those theories that can stand the criticism and practical tests are objectively real and effective theories, only those theories that are no longer suspected after suspicion are worthy of our trust. The third step .To investigate whether the evidence and reason for electronic exists is established? Historical background In Mid-seventeenth century, natural sciences had a huge leap, and Newton was as the representative to a group of scientists to study the nature of the method of observation and experiment, they established a complete, rigorous classical physics theoretical system on the basis of classical mechanics, thermodynamics and electrodynamics. The establishment of this theoretical system greatly expanded the understanding of human towards the material structures and motion laws of the objective world. This had a landmark impact on the times in both fields of science, technology as well as philosophy. During this period, only the mechanics of natural science has been developed to a more complete form, while other disciplines have been still in the stage of collection, collation and analysis of the experiences and materials. The great achievement of the classical mechanics implies the mechanical concept can be applied with no exception to any branches of physics. Namely, particles and forces between particles are used to explain all natural phenomena. As was summarized by physicist Helmholtz: In our opinion, the task of the physical sciences is after all attributed to the constant attraction or repulsion between particles of all physical phenomena, and the strength of these forces is only related to distance between particles, this problem should be solved to fully understand the nature. Then, what particles are to be studied? The scientists in seventeenth-century studied the nature through the observation and experiments, and collected, collated a lot of empirical knowledge, while the reason questioning requires us to find the nature of all kinds of physical phenomena from the micro level by entering deeply into the internal substances. Due to the constraint of the science and technology level then, the microscopic world is neither invisible nor intangible, and the explanation of the reasons then was more of the assumptions and speculation. Whether there are some special properties of such particles in each kind of the natural phenomena? Whether we can use these particles with different natures to explain all kinds of the natural phenomena? The researchers at that time started a useful exploration of nature just through this approach. Due to the influence of Aristotles Four Elements and mechanical concept, the researchers introduced into some of the special nature of particles unconsciously in branches of various disciplines when they made subdivision of natural sciences, such as a certain element, a certain particle. Then they used these particles with different natures to explain all kinds of phenomena in the premise of acknowledging the existence of these particles, or to find basis for the existence of these particles by assuming that they did exist. For example, a substance of phlogiston was introduced into the study of combustion phenomena. A kind of a zero-mass thermal mass named calories was introduced into the study of thermal phenomena, and electron was introduced into the analysis of the phenomenon of electrification by friction. Looking for magnetic monopoles in the analysis of magnetic phenomena, particles theory introduced light particles and undulation hypothesis introduced the medium substance ether of passing mechanical vibration of light waves into the study of light phenomenon. Then, whether the introduction of these substances in the end can help us better understand the nature? The author will discuss the issues arisen after introducing these particles respectively. We have now learned that the introduction of phlogiston can easily explain most of the combustion phenomenon discovered then, to make people believe that it is correct. However, the father of modern chemistry Lavoisier found that the weight of the metal after calcinations was increased when doing experiment of calcined metal. According to phlogiston theory the ashes after burning should be lighter than before combustion. In face of such vivid fact, Lavoisier picked up Occams Razor to remove the substance phlogiston, present a scientific combustion doctrine-oxidation doctrine. In 1798, when British physicist Rumford machined the barrel with a blunt drill, he discovered that the frictional heat was inexhaustible, and the view of thermal mass conservation was wrong. Therefore, Rumford decisively picked up Occams razor to remove the thermal substance (calories) with zero mass. In this way, thermal is the macroeconomic performance of the particle motion in the internal materials, there’s fundamentally no thermal substance in the internal materials (calories). Rumford’s experiment completely destroyed Caloric theory and provided way for development of physics. In March 1905, Einstein denied the existence of the ether according to the famous ether drift experiment done by Michelson and Morey. As the ancient Greek philosopher Parmenides once said: existence is beings, it could not be neglected. Any objective existence of substances in the nature is always objectively existed in some determined place of the world and it will also show us the conclusive evidence and sufficient reason for its existence. Similarly, there’s no existence of none, no matter how good wishes people have, no matter how much we need it, the theory can never exist. There’s the evidence for the existence and sufficient reason for not existing. Then, We can try to list all the reasons supporting the existence of the electrons, and then to analyze whether those reasons are objective and valid. Herewith, the author would like to point out: If the electron was in real existence objectively, then we must also be able to find the conclusive evidence of its objective existence. If the electron really existed objectively, the introduction of the elementary particles could certainly help us to better understand the nature, rather than the reverse. The fourth step Through comprehensive comparison of new and old atomic models in astronomy, geography, physics, chemistry, biology, optical, electrical and other natural subjects, the author has investigated whether it can be better for us to understand the nature without any electronics? It can be sure that before obtaining the conclusive evidence for the existence of the electrons, the reason for people to introduce the electron is to explain some natural phenomena through the electronics. Herewith, what the author would like to express the point is: If we can have the better understanding of the nature under the premise of without the aid of an electron, then there’s little significance for the electronic presence as we do not need it. The five step Do some preparatory work on philosophical level for establishing a unified system of scientific theories. If the new atomic model does not withstand open, free and comprehensive critiques in a few years, then it is not necessary to make summarizes in the philosophical level. But if new atomic model withstands the criticism, If we can have the better understanding of the nature under the premise of without the aid of an electron,if all things in the universe are really composed of a particle of neutrons.then the author will do some preparatory work on the philosophical level for establishing a unified system of scientific theories. Although different readers will have different conclusions towards the same natural phenomenon from different angles by using various approaches, in the face of these diverse views, it’s sure that not all of them are correct. Actually, no one can guarantee that a specific view is entirely correct without any doubt. The ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said: The nature of a thing is accustomed to conceal itself, and it always hides behind the changeable phenomena, which can’t be directly grasped by the sense alone. The reason of the nature of things is far beyond the range of human sense, in the microscopic field, when people can’t perceive a thing though touching, look, listening, and tasting, and then the only way left for people to explore is to make speculation of the reasons for the infinite possibilities of the world based on the observations. In fact, we start to explore the nature just through speculation and hypothesis. However, we human are just ordinary people, and none of us can guarantee not to make mistakes, or not to make speculation. However, it is sure that among these vastly different kinds of speculation, only one is closest to the truth of nature. If we left the relatively best through discussion, if we could use relatively better ways and view of the world to analyze things, then the author believes that everyone can obtain a more objective, truly and effective understanding of the nature. From the 《Basic Principles of Natural Philosophy》 registration number: 2012-A-03623 The purpose for the author to write this book 《Basic Principles of Natural Philosophy》is mainly to provide other researchers with a new clue to explore the nature. content constantly updated。If you are interested in Natural Science。 Add friends please https://facebook/pages/Basic-Principles-of-Natural-Philosophy/567319403397115
Posted on: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 14:06:01 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015