Again foolishness……: Let begin with the nature of particle-antiparticle. All what we know about this phenomenon is that antiparticle is mirror image of respectively particle, but what is the essence nature of this dualism particle antiparticle? The answer comes from the essence of the field and polarization of the space in accordance with the USM kanevuniverse part I. Let see also page 195 to 198 USM where is given convincingly explanation of the nature question of antiparticle, which in summarizing fashion is the following: Antiparticle it is particle escaping from its own polarization space to the contrary one so quickly that there it isn’t tame to reverse its kinematic parameters, which immediately follows by annihilation. It is obviously that some form of common existence even in some not proved as a physical medium fantasy like a black hole it isn’t possible. Every experiment is useful no matter what will be the result: positive at the expectation or negative, because practically the two results are equal valuable. But about the dark matter we have to be more carefully, because the expectation it isn’t correct. First of all that is impossible to be high energy particles ( 10 Gev or so), because we have had to detect such particles in the cosmic rays in the past, but we didn’t. Second weak interaction also we have to reject, because such massive dark objects have pointed gravitational attraction, but not dispersing one as it is suppose to be. The searched particles are impossible to be neutrinos, because these particles are very rarely and because of their so small masses. So what is the dark matter and by which experiment we can detect it? The answer is in this: About the south pole radio telescope experiment. I found out very simpatico and smart team who made amazing experiment. Congratulations! I see that there are specify all of possible differentiations about the signal that was observed, for example there were examined the frequencies provoked by the galactic dust and other radiations in the far infrared area. So the experiment is nice and very useful. But how it is often happens about the universe exploration, we refuse one delusion to come to the another… and so for. So in my view the conclusions from this experiment are delusive or simply incorrect. Let begin with this: Inflation theory it isn’t actual, because of the inertial character of the field (any field, see USM kanevuniverse ), which means that there expand our position on the galaxy, namely our Sun position, which was born on the center-area in our galaxy (at which radius you can see in USM) and after that this radius expanded until we reach to the periphery of our galaxy, where the Sun will die. Because of the inertial character of the field each new mass by which the light ray come will include this mass in dynamically interaction with our mass, which shows like dispersing of the masses. Because the including masses increases continuously this expansion will accelerate, exactly as we observe in reality. So there is no dark energy, but about the dark mass, you can see in USM, it exist but not in the nowadays imagination. So there is not big bang, it’s never happen in nowadays imagination. There is beginning but it is in any galaxy including ours……more in USM! About the relic radiation measurement….That measurement is correct and very useful, but not like a proving ground of the big bang, because such event never happen….why? Well, You can convince yourself if you are willing to read carefully: USM kanevuniverse There You can see that to explain the unity of the fields: gravitation, electrostatic and nuclear, You need to accept the endless number of spaces, three of them is our space, subspace and over space…. What are these spaces You can see on the shown site. The examined radiation, according to USM is radiation of the subspace where is situated the so call dark matter, which is obviously not so dark. This radiation indeed is around 13 billion years old, because this is the age of the Sun, which was born on the center of our galaxy and shifting towards the periphery of the galaxy, after around 13 bln years the Sum will die. So the temperature of this dark matter in the center of our galaxy is so huge that after that amount of years the temperature decreases into several degree ( K). Because the Sun was born from this very young matter (what exactly is this matter You can see on the site shown above), shifting towards the periphery of the galaxy, there gradually is forms the basic particles from the so call proto particle, namely: proton, electron and neutrino and they gradually become heavier and the neutrino becomes lighter, the micro cosmos is thickening and macro cosmos is expand. That is why we observe from our point of view (periphery of our galaxy) the examined radiation as like only several degree (K), but if we sink into the subspace and become part from it, then this temperature will be commensurable with the temperature of the known stars in our galaxy. The different temperature places of this relic radiation, has nothing to do with discussed hypothetical big bang. Moreover in present imagination of big bang we cannot explain how this radiation exist without any mass carrier, but only like post factor of some hypothetical event – called big bang . And many more…… And this: Nice and comprehensive review, about the features of light in the medium and with medium, which means that there exist mass (atoms, molecules, crystal structures), which it isn’t so about the hypothetical big band physically impossible to exist energy – “purely energy” without any mass?! Then from what is contains this purely energy, or simple it isn’t possible to exist – that is about Higgs scalar field. Obviously the observation of sky far infra red radiation (incorrectly called here as a relict radiation) and its eventually polarization in fact has some mass carrier which is actually heat conductor. What is the nature of this matter and why we don’t see it? Because this is the so called dark matter which is contains from proto particles. According to USM kanevuniverse if we sing in the space of this proto particle and become part of it then we can see very many stars similar to ours in our space, this stars are from subspace where the atoms (nuclei and nuclear particles) of our space are the galaxies in the subspace. Proto particle is many times lighter than the proton and slightly less lightly than the electron and many times heavier than the neutrino and this particle in fact was born on the center of our galaxy (which is in force about any galaxy) and gives the beginning of the these three stable particles, which it isn’t form of fantasy, but physically proven fact, see Q&A USM kanevuniverse By the way on the part III is given the essence of the electromagnetic waves and you can convince yourselves that such electromagnetic process can’t travel in empty or absolute space (which it isn’t vacuum because in the vacuum exist definite above proto particles which are galaxies from the subspace). By the essence of the field creation (see USM) follows that such absolute space cannot exist. So this is another proof that the so called Higgs scalar field cannot exist and one of the very convincingly reason (only one from large number!) that such event like big bang never happen! But let return towards the proto particles and try to estimate the sub temperature (similar to the same measurement in our space) of the surface where this radiation is produces by the sub stars there. We take the coefficient of thickening of the micro cosmos observed from our position – “solid body” of our space (see USM) which is 2,63.10 rising to a 4 power folds. So multiplied this coefficient by the temperature of this far infra red radiation (relict) which is several degree (K) we obtain that the surface temperature of sub stars are around 20000 to 50000 degree (K) which is nice result about similar young star in our space, but not trillions degree (big bang supposition!) which can’t exist because we can’t measure this temperature not because it is almost infinite, but because there we haven’t mass and therefore accelerations and forces and measurement of such phenomenon is impossible, which means that it isn’t exist! But I believe that this experiment has huge potential and will be correctly to continue further. I propose the following experiment: The idea is to see (how it is possible of course) whether in the frequencies which are responsible about the galactic dust, exists some “red shifting” (low frequency part thickening) and to compare such eventually shifting about the main observed radiation. Because about the close to us (as a observers - radius position of our Sun in the galaxy) dust, such shifting shouldn’t exist (we are shifting together with this dust towards the periphery of the galaxy), but if we discovery such shifting in the main radiation, this will be direct evidence that the observed radiation comes from the proto particles, which in fact represent the galaxies from the sub space, which shouldn’t shift compared to the stars (including our Sun). Actually what is observed as a radiation reminds a lot the “universe” of the sub space, which is similar to our universe if we can look it from above! G.Kanev
Posted on: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 21:46:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015