Create Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, who again creates many Frankensteins. aaji TVt dekhilu Oxomor hey particular organization keitar bahire baki hokolu ulai aahil NewX news tur karone. Mohammed Ajmal Amir Kasab (Punjabi/Urdu: محمد اجمل امیر قصاب; 13 July 1987 – 21 November 2012)[1] was a Pakistani[5][6] militant and a member of the Lashkar-e-Taiba Islamist group, through which he took part in the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks in India.[7][8] Kasab was the only attacker captured alive by police. akol ajon ba dujon nohoi, President PM Judgeu nohoi, gutei prithivi LIVE witness aasil tar crimer karone. 2008t hokoluwe dekha paisil teon ki crime korisil, dhorao paril kintu punishment 2012t he pale. juwakali newsr kothar pora jadi kunubai koi prothome LAW tat proman hobo diya - manuh tetialoike wait kori thokatu not acceptable. aamar manuhe karu uporot depend kori lav nai, nije precaution logo lage, prothome ghar, tar past usor suburia, tar past village ba town etc. including people irrespective of caste, community and religion. aapunaluke nije jane je ai news tur karone hokolu political party khubei aanandito. Sheikh Hasina (Bengali: শেখ হাসিনা; English /ˈʃeɪx həˈsiːnə/, SHAYKH hə-SEE-nə; born 28 September 1947)[1] is the current Prime Minister of Bangladesh, in office since January 2009. She previously served as Prime Minister from 1996 to 2001, and she has led the Bangladesh Awami League since 1981. She is the eldest of five children of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the founding father and first President of Bangladesh, and widow of the nuclear scientist M. A. Wazed Miah. Sheikh Hasinar group ba family-tur logot Bharat sarkar aru Bharotor Intelligence agencyr relation tu bohut, bohut dinor purona. The verdict of January 31 (2014) on the alleged arms smuggling to ULFA (United Liberation Front of Asom) that was detained at Chittagong Port in 2004 dismayed not only the independent analysts, but also the political scientists as well as judicial, military and intelligence experts. The verdict that awarded death sentence to two former ministers, DGs (Director General) of DGFI (Directorate General of Forces Intelligence) and NSI (National Security Intelligence) and nine others, including ULFA’s incumbent military chief Parseh Baruah, also surfaces a question whether the sovereignty of Bangladesh, a country surrounded by India almost from three sides, is mortgaged to India, as the case as well as the verdict suffers from various loopholes and entirely serves Indian interest. None ever heard that death sentence could be awarded for arms smuggling if the accused even could have been caught red-handed on the spot of detaining the arms at Chittagong Port. It is alleged that the formation of charge sheets, process of prolonged investigation, repeated inclusion of new accused, alternation of the investigation officers, repeated reschedules of submitting the investigation report, and the pattern of verdict show that the entire judicial process was heavily influenced and manipulated by India through its ally the incumbent government of Sheikh Hasina to suit India’s policy and interest. Through such manipulation not only 14 persons were awarded capital punishment, but also proved that Bangladesh is a safe haven of anti-India elements. In a statement (Ulfa-i/C003B/14) issued on February 1 (2014) ULFA Chairman Dr Abhijeet Asom ventilated the same spirit. He recalling the freedom fighters of Bangladesh claimed that none of accused other than one RAW agent was involved in the smuggling deal. Let me quote the text of ULFA Chairman’s Statement: Above mentioned Paresh Asom is Paresh Baruah. The details are very much long but I am trying to make as much brief as possible. The reality is that India walks contrary to the line what Sheikh Hasina preaches. India uses its all agencies in Bangladesh. Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) is part and parcel of Bangladesh since time immemorial. Bangladesh is not an occupation power in CHT. But India being a friendly country since 1973 strives to cede CHT from Bangladesh. With this end in view India motivated Manibendu Larma to float a separatist group Parbatiya Chhotogram Jano Shanghati Somity (PCJSS) and its military wing Shanti Bahini (SB). Later India provided money, shelter, training, arms to SB to fight against Bangladesh. Asoka Raina, an Indian journalist in his book Inside RAW Today: The Story of India’s Secret Services (Bikas Publishers, New Delhi, India, 1981, pp. 86-87) presented relevant documents in this regard. He wrote, the RAW operatives closely assisted the Chakma guerrillas. The Chakmas after the change of the government in 1975 contacted the RAW. They offered to infiltrate among the Mizo rebels and pass information to the Indian government in lieu of asylum. This offer was accepted by the then Indian government. Ashoke Biswas in an article published in The New Nation (August 31, 1994) of Dhaka wrote: The RAW was involved in training the rebels of Chakma tribes and Shanti Bahini to carry out subversive activities in Bangladesh. In this context let me quote an Indian journalist and BBC Correspondent Mr. Subir Bhaumik. In an interview to Dhaka-based fortnightly news magazine Probe (Vol. 1, issue 4, September 1-15, 2001), he said, “You will see in my book, Arom 1975-1990, the RAW backed Shanti Bahini. …… In 1976 after Shanti Bahini went underground, their people had gone for training in India. Mind you, the rank and file was trained in India. —— There was a clear indication given to Mr. Larma that India was prepared for up to 50,000 guerrillas. Train them, arm them and equip them.” With this end in view India opened in Tripura and Mizoram, even at Chakrata near Dehradun. Tribid Chakma, a SB cadre, disclosed at a press conference held at National Press Club of Dhaka in September 1994 informed that SB terrorists opened 25 camps of which he could recollect the names of nine sites viz., Sabrum, Silachari, Boyal Para, Kadamtoli, Dayek, Barachari, Ralma, Trimagha and Ratannagar. He informed that some most trusted ones were trained at Dehradun. A defunct English Weekly of Dhaka Friday (June 3, 1998) informed, “The attempt of M. N. Larma to negotiate a settlement with the Ziaur Rahman government failed as the armed wing of the PCJSS was compelled to initiate armed operation under Indian pressure in 1976.” It was also disclosed later that India out of apprehension developed anti-Larma faction in PCJSS and on December 10, 1983 gunned down him along with his eight other comrades outwardly by Pritikumar faction. Indian government took no action against Pritikumar Chakma, rather allowed him to stay in India even after the signing of the so-called peace treaty. Last, but not least, India in a bid to internationalize the CHT issue financed and manipulated so-called Chakma conferences in Amsterdam (1968), Hamburg (1987), New York (1992) and The Netherlands, Kolkata and Bangkok (1997) where Indian tribals were branded as the dwellers of CHT. To create international pressure on Bangladesh India using its stooges persuaded about 70 thousand CTH tribal people to India. These so-called refugees when tried to flee away from India were detained in camps under BSF supervision. (For further information regarding India’s role in CHT, interested readers may go through to Mohammad Zainal Abedin book: The Chittagong Hill Tracts: A Victim of Indian Intervention, Eastern Publications, 16 Silvester House, London, EI 2JD, UK, 2003). Mohammad Zainal Abedin is a New York(US) based Bangladeshi journalist & researcher. He can be reached at noa@agni. India imposed an undeclared war on Bangladesh violating the Indo-Bangladesh Cooperation and Friendship Treaty signed on March 19, 1972 by Bangladesh Founder Sheikh Mujibur Rahman & Indira Gandhi what clearly guaranteed that one country would neither allow the terrorists of the other to use its territory nor encourage any activity subversive to the internal peace and security and territorial integrity. Sheikh Hasina didn’t seek explanation why India violated the treaty in 1973 floating PCJSS and later SB to cede one-tenth portion of tiny Bangladesh territory. Rather she during her first term as prime minister endangering the sovereignty and integrity of Bangladesh signed so-called peace treaty with the Chakma traitors; though India still dates backs the same traitors and India would let loose them whenever patriotic forces form government in Bangladesh. Later it was uncovered that she did such deed being coveted by Indian assurance of wining a Nobel Peace Price for her. It simply proves that Sheikh Hasina can undermine the interest and sovereignty of Bangladesh for her own sake. If she had minimum sense of patriotism she would never have signed so-called peace treaty defying the suggestion of the then military officials. She would have tried the traitors for killing 35 thousand Bengali speaking people in CHT. Rather spending state money she nurses Shantu Larma for the last 18 years though he represents none in CHT. On the other hand, Indian government using the Kolkata-based Bengalee Hindus who left for India after the partition of the subcontinent in 1947 raises a demand to create a so-called Hinduland comprising one-third portion of Bangladesh in its South-Western region. Sheikh Hasina never protested such activity of India. After all these records how Sheikh Hasina mainly to please India could accuse not only army personnel of Bangladesh, but as if, the whole nation for smuggling arms to ULFA. Bangladesh didn’t create or help ULFA. They wage their struggle of their own. Their logic and reasons of the armed struggle are more genuine and acceptable than Bangladesh against Pakistan. The forefathers of people of Bangladesh to get rid of Hindu exploitation and suppression voluntarily united with the people of West Pakistan to form a Muslim homeland. They created Pakistan. West Pakistanis didn’t compel people of Bangladesh to forcibly join them. On the other hand, what India did in case of SEWA? India manipulatively annexed the SEWA region against the will of the local people, who are ethnically, historically, culturally, geographically, linguistically, above all psychologically differ from rest of India. So their struggle enjoys genuine reasons and deserves support from all quarters who believes in liberty, freedom of choice, self-determination, above all, humanity. On the other hand, the Bangladesh region was never a part of India before the British government manipulatively Assam in1826. The local people of Bangladesh aspired that the British prior to their departure would return their homeland to them as independent State like all other former British colonies. But their aspiration nipped in the bud, as Gandhi and Nehru through intrigues and false assurances, above all manipulation, persuaded the outgoing British government to annex SEWA to India in 1947 showing no respect to the hopes and aspiration of the local people of Bangladesh. Nonetheless, the Nagas of the Naga Hill District (now Nagaland) declared its independence on August 14, 1947 challenging its annexation by the British to India. Indian armed forces attacked Naga Hills and ousted the independent government of Nagaland led by Phizo, but resistance of the Nagas persists despite martial law-like rule since then to date. Later in 1949 India under gunpoint forced the King and Queen of the Princely States Manipur and Tripura respectively to merge their Princely States to India and interlinked them to Assam. But to materialize its divide and rule policy India divided the region into seven States: Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalya, Mizoram and Nagaland. In no time, SEWA people found India a worse ruthless colonial occupant began to exploit the region to that of the British. India without striving to win the heart the Northeasterners initiates to suppress them using brutal power. India deployed over 4, 00,000 regular armed forces, AFSA completed 56 years in NE, other than para-militia, police, and other auxiliaries and intelligent agents in the region who let loose reign of terror where murder, extra-judicial killing, secret killing, killing is planted crossfire, abduction, missing, rape, human rights violation etc., became very common and normal affairs what the local people never experienced during the British period. India without shunning its policy of colonial exploitation and ruthless repression accuses Bangladesh for the ongoing armed resistance, though Bangladesh has to play there. It is not the fault of Bangladesh if the freedom seekers of Assam and other regions, being chased by the Indian forces, sneaked into Bangladesh territory to save their lives. Once such terrified people enter any territory to avert sure death, no responsible human being could hand over such fleeing people to their adversaries. Such move contrasts to Bangladesh Constitution though she to maintain Constitutional continuity clunged to power through holding India-prescribed pre-arranged election overwhelmingly boycotted by the Bangladeshis. Sheikh Hasina violating their Constitutional bindings handed over the key freedom fighters of SEWA to Indian authorities. The Constitution of Bangladesh says that Bangladesh is committed to extend its support to the liberation struggle of the oppressed people anywhere in the world. Critics say, Sheikh Hasina cries for the territorial integrity of India, but not for that of Bangladesh. If their assumption was fallacious she would have demanded the trial of those who were and are responsible for imposing secessionist wars on Bangladesh. Did India arrested or tried its RAW officials for their involvement in arming the terrorists of Bangladesh, Myanmar, China, Nepal, Pakistan, Maldives and Sri Lanka while Sheikh Hasina justifies the arrest and trial of DGFI and NSI Director Generals now for the ULFA case? How 14 people could be hanged for their alleged involvement in a foiled arms smuggling to ULFA though the accused claimed they were not involved in its – means still both India and Bangladesh intellectuals are not changed. Both India and East Pakistan(Bangladesh) created Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, who again created many Frankensteins and we are dragged. But myself has faith on Damodardas Modi, let’s see. Hope people still remember the truths of some Indians, after Indira Nehru married Feroze Jehangir Gandhi, Indiras father opposed her marriage and approached Mahatma Gandhi to dissuade the young couple, but to no avail. The couple were arrested and jailed in August 1942, during the Quit India Movement less than six months after their marriage, he was imprisoned for a year in Allahabads Naini Central Prison. I have a question in mind from long time back and hope this attached video (not much in this) will tell you that youtube/watch?v=H2sZCTsatv8
Posted on: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:15:47 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015