Here is some Bashar stuff related to 9/11 (before and after) *Illumination/Nuclear Probabilities 2-6-98 [Canoga Park,CA] Q2: Whats the percentage of probability of.... B: Of the isolated terrorist nuclear strike, now? Ninety-eight percent, coinciding with your year. Q2: Where? B: This is yet to be determined. It may be in what you call your Middle East. It may be in what you call one of your eastern seaboard American cities. The most likely window of opportunity will be between what you would call March of your present year and March of the next year. Q: Is president Clinton and others aware that this is.... B: They are aware of the possibility and the potentiality. There exists, at present, a few small minor clues that would allow them to understand that it may be more imminent than they think, but they havent seen these clues yet. They havent picked up on the idea that these are indicators that it could be more serious than they think. They are always prepared for the possibility, they know that for a fact, that it is likely to happen. But there are actually now a few small clues that specifically indicate when and where such a thing might now be being thought of, or carried out, or planned. Again, if such a thing does come to pass, as we have said, even though the likelihood may seem high, in terms of what you call your odds, if it does occur, it will still create such a shock wave through your culture, over your whole planet that no such thing will ever occur again, ever, ever, ever. It does not have to occur, even at 98%, it doesnt have to occur, but if it does, it will never occur again because it will change many things, many, many things. But that is as we read the energy now. For any such thing as a prediction, is no prediction of the future, but only a sensing of the energy that exists at the time the prediction is made, and if that changes, the prediction is moot. But that is the energy we read right now in this latest, as you would say, barometer reading. ............ ............ *Swirling Probabilities 2-20-98 [Canoga Park,CA] Q3: Have we lowered the percentage of the likelihood of a terrorist attack since last week? B: It is still hovering somewhere between 95 and 97 percent. That is somewhat lower but not by much. Q3: Right. Just out of curiosity. B: Yes. Q3: What frequency would you have to be vibrating at in order to be unaffected or, transformed in any way, by a neutron bomb going off? B: It would have to be at least 250,000 cycles per second, more likely you would have to be closer to 300,000. Q3: Okay. If 250,00 is the threshold, is it only because of fluctuations that you would need to be.... B: Yes, because as part of the collective mass consensus there still may be, at 250,00 cycles per second, certain mass consensus effects that there would not be any of at 300,000. But someone skilled at balancing, slightly above 250,000 could manage it. .... Q5: Good day, Bashar. 4 a terrorist attack, is a nuclear attack against New York and/or in the Middle East. Is that correct? B: Yes. Q5: Is it only.... B: Now remember we said most likely in the Middle East or against a city on your Eastern seaboard, most likely New York. Q5: Okay, the Internet is abuzz with rumors of remote viewers who have viewed a nuclear attack explosion outside of Rochester, New York. Can you give us any reason.... B: That is one of the probable reality streams, it is not definite, it is not ordained. Q5: Why Rochester? Do you have any idea? B: Yes. Q5: What is the reason? B: It is one of the last places anyone would look. Q5: These same remote viewers claim that there are three other cities that are...um.... B: One moment, we are not done. Q5: Okay. B: If you understand the climactic patterns of that area on your planet, you will understand why Rochester. It will spread the fallout in a certain way. Q5: Okay. B: You follow me. Q5: I do. B: It will also effect the water table in a certain way. Q5: Okay, do you see in your 95 to 97 percent other cities besides New York? B: Well, obviously what you call your Washington D. C. is a high candidate. Most likely within what you would call the Washington Monument, since it is a high spire and a nuclear device going off is, in some senses, more effective on top of a tower. Q5: Its closed for a couple of years. B: Well, that may actually be of benefit to terrorists. Q5: So these are back pack nukes you are talking about? B: Oh yes. Q5: Okay, um.... B: It is not something that now, in your technology, needs to be very large and it doesnt even necessarily need to explode over a very large area. Remember that the very idea of something going off that would even affect a mile to a five mile, to a ten mile radius will be devastating to your psyche and your consciousness. Q5: And these are atomic, hydrogen or neutron bombs? B: They are not neutron, they are most likely simple atomic. Q5: Okay. And do you see in that any anthrax attacks? B: That is a separate issue, though there is one stream we follow that, in some senses, would actually engage a double or triple attack. In other words there would be the release of a biological weapon that would then create an area in which it would be easier to deliver a nuclear weapon Q5: Okay, there are many reports of such an attack.... B: Yes. Q5: ...in most of the major cities in this country. Do you see any percentage probability for that? B: There are. Q5: What would the percentage probability be? B: We will only now give a few. There is a 24% probability that what you call the new Denver Airport will receive such a strike. There is a 17% to 37% probability that your Los Angeles will receive such a strike. There is a 19% probability that your San Francisco will receive such a strike. One moment, one moment, one moment, there is actually a 87% to 98% probability that there will be an accidental detonation in what you call your upper mid- western states, somewhere such as your Montana or such. In that a terrorist may not have been able to actually deliver the device to where it was intended before it goes off. Q5: Okay. B: Some of these devices will come down through your area called Canada. And thus, after crossing the border one such device may accidentally go off, but again, all of this is fluctuation in motion. These are all swirling probabilities, some of which are more or less crystallized by a cacophony and a symphony of different events. Do not allow yourselves to delve into them to strongly, or you will aid and assist in their crystallization. But allow them to keep moving, as symbolized by what you call the spin of the roulette wheel. If you all allow yourselves to fall into the right vibration, it is still possible, regardless of any of the percentages we have given you, that you could fall into the double zero, negative, negative, nothing, nothing. Q5: By being neutral, right? By letting it be okay. Letting it be a valid choice. B: That is the general approach, and helping to direct your energy and apply your energy in a positive way, wherever possible. ......... ......... *Excerpt from R.S.V.P.* October 20, 2001 Now we will take a moment to remind you, that we in general spoke of this in your year of 1998, and did mention at that time, that there was, at that time, a 97% chance of what you call a terrorist strike on your New York City. At the time we included the possibility of it being nuclear in nature, for that was the most likely scenario at the time of the sensing. In essence that is the only main factor that has changed. And because that has now come to fruition, and you have now passed on to the other side of a doorway, crossed a specific kind of energy threshold, we can now find it within our agenda to communicate with you again, to continue the conversation that we began back in what you call your year of 1998, which to us was yesterday. For again, understand, that time is meaningless to us. But we understood that your consciousness was required to go through a significant shift before there could be other things that would be presented. https://youtube/watch?v=Z8WB9AgjGSU
Posted on: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:32:16 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015