How Tejo Mahalaya became Taj Mahal: A fraud by historians like Ariyas & Dravidas: BBC says about Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth - Never say it is a Tomb Aerial view of the Taj Mahal The interior water well  Frontal view of the Taj Mahal and dome Close up of the dome with pinnacle  Close up of the pinnacle  Inlaid pinnacle pattern in courtyard  Red lotus at apex of the entrance  Rear view of the Taj & 22 apartments  View of sealed doors & windows in back  Typical Vedic style corridors  The Music House--a contradiction  A locked room on upper floor  A marble apartment on ground floor  The OM in the flowers on the walls  Staircase that leads to the lower levels  300 foot long corridor inside apartments  One of the 22 rooms in the secret lower level  Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms  Interior of another of the locked rooms  Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room  Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks  Secret walled door that leads to other rooms  Secret bricked door that hides more evidence  Palace in Barhanpur where Mumtaz died  Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried NOW READ THIS....... No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says theTaj Mahal is not Queen Mumtazs tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his research O ak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court ch ronicle, Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtazs burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur stillretains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place fordead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oaks inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term Mahal has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria . The unusual explanation that the term TajMahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani, he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters Mum from a womans name to derive the remainder as the name for the building.Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shivas Palace . Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale cre ated bycourt sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahans time corroborates the love story. Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahans era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a fewsamples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtazs death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtazs death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahans time. Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu templeratherthan a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahans time and are still inaccessible to the public . Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhis government t ried to have Prof. Oaks book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit orvalidate Oaks research. The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Ma hal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate. Do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this reality.....
Posted on: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:59:12 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015