JAN 25, 2014 - OBAMA INDICTED BY FEDERAL U.S. COURT.... TRUE??? LAROUCHE SAYS IT IS IMPEACHMENT BY INDICTMENT ...REALLY??? AND HE SAYS THIS GUY MUST BE IMPEACHED NOW...THAT WILL DEEM OBAMA AS A LEGAL PRESIDENT AND NULLIFY ANY BASIS FOR NOT LEGALLY BEING A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN...On January 25th, 2013 , Mr. Lyndon Larouche, a well respected journalist and political activist recieved word from his sources within the United States government that President Barack Hussein Obama has been indicted by a Federal Court...SEE VIDEO the-tap.blogspot/2013/02/obama-indicted-in-federal-court-hes.html BECAUSE...The indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions and The Departments consideration of this issue in 1973 arose in two distinct legal contexts. First, the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) prepared a comprehensive memorandum in the fall of 1973 that analyzed whether all federal civil officers are immune from indictment or criminal prosecution while in office, and, if not, whether the President and Vice President in particular are immune from indictment or criminal prosecution while in office... ...The OLC memorandum concluded that all federal civil officers except the President are subject to indictment and criminal prosecution while still in office; the President is uniquely immune from such process. justice.gov/olc/sitting_president.htm OBAMA CANNOT BE IMPEACHED If Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4) Read more at wnd/2011/07/321969/#G2a0V0812qIwDOMw.99 & ATTORNEY GENERAL WONT QUO WARRANTO HIM OUT...only proper way to assert such a direct attack is through an action for a writ of quo warranto. See id. at 1497 (citing cases). ... A quo warranto action may only be brought by the Attorney General of the United States or the United States Attorney or, if these Executive Branch officials decline a request, by a private party who has obtained leave of court. See D.C. Stat. §§ 16-3502-3503; see also Rae v. Johnson, 1993 WL 544295, at *1 ONLY OFFICIALS THAT ARE AFFECTED BY OBAMA - THROUGH WASHINGTON D.C. - CAN SUPPOSEDLY DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT... Code District of Columbia, apply to actions in quo warranto instituted by authorized parties against national officers of the United States ... Unless the right to maintain quo warranto proceedings under the District Code were limited to persons actually and personally interested, every officer attached to the government at Washington would be subject to attack by persons having no claim in the office or interest therein different from that of every other citizen and taxpayer of the United States. INTERESTED PARTIES MEANS An interested person within the meaning of the provisions of the District Code in regard to quo warranto proceedings is one who has an interest in the office itself peculiar to himself whether the office be elective or appointive... THE COURT WILL ONLY AWARD AN INTERESTED PERSON TO HAVE WRIT IF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OR U.S. ATTORNEY REFUSES... If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person on his compliance with the condition prescribed by section 16-3502 as to security for costs. .. BUT THE JUDGES WONT LET THEM...6 The D.C. Court of Appeals has observed that a plaintiff who seeks to directly attack the appointment of an official (as opposed to attacking an action of that official) will rarely if ever have standing. See Andrade v. Lauer, 729 F.2d 1475, 1496-97 (D.C. Cir. 1984). devvy/new_site/quo-follow-up-051211.html devvy/new_site/quo-follow-up-051211.html HE CAN BE INDICTED FOR WAR CRIMES BY ANOTHER COUNTRY...BUT HE GETS TO STAY PRESIDENT...AND AFTER HE LEAVES OFFICE...THEN THEY HAVE TO COME AND ARREST HIM...The president runs the risk of being declared a war criminal by a magistrate in the EU.... If they indict him as a war criminal, an indictment for which theres no statute of limitations, after he leaves the White House, he cant go to Europe for fear of having to confront this. WILL HE BE INDICTED AFTER HE IS OUT OF OFFICE??......Our legal research has shown how serious the criminal charges can be against Mr. Obama. YES—if he is found ineligible to serve as President because he is not a “natural born” citizen, he could be facing numerous felony charges, just under federal law alone! AND, every piece of legislation that Mr. Obama has signed will become null and void. AND, every political appointment made by Mr. Obama will be vacated… as will every program implemented by those officials, or action taken by them during their term in the Obama government. If Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible to serve as President, he could be charged not only with the federal crimes listed below, but, potentially, with crimes in a number of states where he falsely represented that he was qualified to run for President—as could those people who helped him perpetrate this fraud. There could also be numerous challenges to everything that he ever did as “President.” Those potential federal criminal charges are as follows: 1. FALSE PERSONALTION OF OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF THE UNITED STATES (18 United States Code {U.S.C.} 912). The U. S. Code says: “Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.” 2. CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT OFFENSE OR TO DEFRAUD UNITED STATES. (18 U.S.C. 371) The U. S. Code reads: “If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.” 3. ACTIVITIES AFFECTING ARMED FORCES DURING WAR. (18 U.S.C. 2388(a)) The U. S. Code says: “(a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies; or a Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.” dancingczars.wordpress/2011/04/29/can-a-sitting-president-be-indicted-criminally-instead-of-being-impeached
Posted on: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:47:08 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015