Non Slave Owner Coram Nobis #deep Non Slave Owner Coram Nobis - TopicsExpress



          

Non Slave Owner Coram Nobis #deep Non Slave Owner Coram Nobis IN THE COURT OF THE STATE OF _________ CASE #_________________ FICTITIOUS FOREIGN STATE Vs JUDGE _________________ ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS Non corporate entity NON SLAVE OWNER UNDER THE FUGITIVE SLAVE ACT SEPTEMBER 18 ,1850 ________________________________________________________________________ ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS NON SLAVE OWNER UNDER THE FUGITIVE SLAVE ACT SEPTEMBER 18 ,1850 Now comes________________________________________ a non corporate entity and non slave owner with a ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS NON SLAVE OWNER UNDER THE FUGITIVE SLAVE ACT SEPTEMBER 18 ,1850, pursuant to FRCP Rule 17 interested party; non slave owner and this Court jurisdiction lies under FRCP 4 (j) This Court is defined under FRCP Rule 4 (j) as a FOREIGN STATE as purported in and defined under 28 USC 1602 -1611 FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY ACT (FSIA), By this administrative offices stepping-outside-of slave ownership along with your corporate officers under 28 USC 1608, they are stepping into a foreign state status. Your officers now come under the Emergency War Powers Act and Trading with the Enemy Act clauses and causes you to be subject to the UCMJ under Title 10 USC and your officers are in violation of HR 1955 and HR 3162, causing them and this Administrative hearing board to be subject to domestic terrorism and to be defined in a NOTICE OF FELONY against such officers and this Administrative board. It is also an undisputed, conclusive presumption that the accusers are making allegations that I am or have been a slave owner or slave trader. By the Administrative office, the Accusers who are misusing my name, address, EIN / SS number and the DOB, are now conspiring in a fraudulent act under The Fugitive Slave Act, September 18, 1850. By such acts this Administrative Office and the Accusers are in violation of The Emergency War Powesr Act( EWPA) and the Trading with the Enemy Act (TEA). The accusers are either refusing to support their claims of slave ownership or can not support their fraudulent allegations before any administrative hearing boards. Such accusers will be required to prove so. Absent such chattle agreement between this defendant and the accusers all allegations must fail under the disguise of Master/ servant relationship. There are Two frauds being placed by the accusers before this administrative hearing board and a third fraud is being added upon the America Citizens; 1) the fact that we are a slave owner, 2) The fact that we are by definition a corporation and 3) The fact that this administrative hearing is operating in a foreign state jurisdiction that comes under EWPA and TEA making it an International incident. “In all of these laws it is laid down that the child follows the condition of the mother, whomever.” “ All their issue and their offspring, born or to be born, shall be, and are hereby declared to be, and remain FOR EVER HEREAFTER, absolute slaves, and shall follow the condition of the mother.” “In no trial or hearing under this act shall the testimony of such alleged fugitive be admitted in evidence.” (Jay’s Inquiry, p. 129. See Act of 1740. 2 Brevard’s Digest, 229.) Similar in Georgia. (Prince’s Dig., 446. Act of 1770.) And in Mississippi. (Revised Code of 1823, p. 369.) And in Virginia. (Revised Code of 1819, p. 421.) And in Kentucky. (Littell and Swigert’s Digest, 1149-50.) And in Louisiana. (Civil Code, art. 183.) The follow acts have been repealed or are still in effect that has direct effect as purported in the above case law. Repealed Feb 20, 1820 entire act An act for the Gradual Abolition of Slavery Birth Certificate Feb.15, 1804, Acts 28th G.A. 2nd sitting, ch.CIII, p.251-254. Repealed March 6, 1806 section 3; every child so abandoned shall be maintained by such person until such child arrives to the age of one year, and thereafter shall be considered as a pauper of such township or county. Still in effect after 1846 act Supplement to an act, entitled An act for the settlement and relief of the poor [Mar.11,1774], June 10, 1820, §§6-8, Public Acts 44th G.A. [3rd sitting], p.166, 168-169; Penn. 763,765; Elm.Dig. Poor §§34-36, p.416-417. Included in An Act for the settlement and relief of the poor, revision approved April 10, 1846, §§29-31, Revision of 1846, Title XXXII, ch.1, p.877, 892; Nix.Dig. 1855 p.614-615; Nix.Dig. 1868 p.714-715; and revision approved March 27, 1874, §§33-35, Revision of 1877, p.844; General Statutes 1895, p.2511; Compiled Statutes 1910, p.4025. (Repealed by P.L.1930, c.37, p.93,171.) (Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President) 1913-1921) “Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. We will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.” With the Congressional document known as an Act for the Gradual Abolition of Slavery 1850s and the above purported case laws that show that a mother passes on the so call slave ownership from children to children as defined by Edward Mandell House’ statements. This goes to show the true intent of the accusers to defraud not only this America Citizen but every America Citizen that comes before such Administrative hearing board. The accusers are misrepresenting the nature of the crime through the use of false allegations and other fraudulent statements in order to defraud this Party. By misusing the true terms of the English language by this fraud and deceit and misrepresentation of the language, the accusers are in violation of The Emergency War Powers Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act before this administrative hearing board. The people of this nation has been told and allowed to be believe slavery has been abolished , but yet the accusers are misusing an act that has been repealed in 1820 in order to enslave this party and all others who appear before these administrative hearing boards. As an America Citizen I hold the inherent right of the 11th amendment immunity. The judicial power shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted by a Foreign State. If this FOREIGN STATE is misusing the name of this America Citizen by claims of slave ownership or placing it in all caps or misusing the last name or using the term “person” as a CORPORATION all complaints and suits against such CORPORATION fall under the FSIA and the DEPT OF STATE OFFICES in Washington DC. DC now has to be notified pursuant to 22 CFR 93.1 -93.2. A copy of the FSIA has to be filed with the complaint to the defendant’s chief executive officer of such CORPORATION. MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, OR STATE COURTS lack jurisdiction to hear any case under the FOREIGN STATE definitions. This jurisdiction lies with the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT under the FSIA Statutes pursuant to 28 USC 1330. Because the Defendant is a non corporate entity and not a slave owner nor registered with any Secretary of State as a CORPORATION the Accuser has FAILED to state a claim to which relief can be granted under 12(b) (6). This matter must be dismissed for lack of political, personam, and subject matter jurisdiction and venue as applied to the America citizen as not being subject to a foreign state under the 11th amendment. Definitions Corpus Juris Secundum The Body of Law or Legal encyclopedia, Volume 7, Section 4: as quoted: Attorney & client: An Attorneys first duty is to the Courts (1st) and the public (2nd) and not to the client (3rd), and wherever the duties to an attorneys client conflict with those interests that he/she owes his allegiance to, as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter. The Biggest problem today is that People do not know their own rights & blindly entrust their rights to someone else. BLACK‘S LAW DICTIONARY FIFTH EDITION Foreign Court The courts of a foreign state or nation. In the United States, this term is frequently applied to the courts of one of the states when their judgment or records are introduced in the courts of another. Foreign jurisdiction Any jurisdiction foreign to that of the forum; e.g. a sister state or another country. Also the exercise by a state or nation jurisdiction beyond its own territory. Long - arm Service of process is a form of such foreign or extraterritorial jurisdiction Foreign laws The laws of a foreign country, or of a sister state. In conflict of law, the legal principle of jurisprudence which are part of the law of a sister state or nation. Foreign laws are additions to our own laws, and in that respect are called “jus receptum” Foreign corporation A corporation doing business in one state though chartered or incorporated in another state is a foreign corporation as to the first state, and, as such, is required to consent to certain conditions and restriction in order to do business in such first state. Under federal tax laws, a foreign corporation is one which is not organized under the law of one of the states or territories of the United States. I.R.C. § 7701 (a) (5). Service of process on foreign corporation is governed by the Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 See also Corporation TITLE 26 - INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, Subtitle F - Procedure and Administration ,CHAPTER 79 – DEFINITIONS Sec. 7701. Definitions (5) Foreign The term foreign when applied to a corporation or partnership means a corporation or partnership which is not domestic. Foreign service of process Service of process for the acquisition of jurisdiction by a court in the United States upon a person in a foreign country is prescribed by Fed R. Civ. P. 4 (i) and 28 U.S.C.A. § 1608. Service of process on foreign corporation is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) (3) Foreign states Nations which are outside the United States. Term may also refer to another state; i.e. a sister state. Foreign immunity With respect to jurisdiction immunity of foreign nation, see 28 U.S.C.A 1602 et seq. Profiteering Taking advantage of unusual or exceptional circumstance to make excessive profit; e.g. selling of scarce or essential goods at inflated price during time of emergency or war. Person In general usage, a human being (i.e. nature person) thought by statute term may include a firm, labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, ,legal representative, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy ,or receivers. National Labor Relations act, §2(1). A corporation is a” person” within meaning of equal protection and due process provisions of United States Constitution. Writ of error coram nobis A common-law writ, the purpose of which is to correct a judgment in the same court in which it was rendered, on the ground of error of fact, for which it was statutes provides no other remedy, which fact did not appear of record, or was unknown to the court when judgment was pronounced, and which ,if known would have prevented the judgment, and which was unknown, and could of reasonable diligence in time to have been otherwise presented to the court, unless he was prevented from so presenting them by duress, fear, or other sufficient cause. At common law in England, it issued from the Court of Kings Bench to a judgment of that court. Its principal aim is to afford the court in which an action was tried and opportunity to correct it own record with reference to a vital fact not known when the judgment was rendered. It is also said that at common law It lay to correct purely ministerial errors of the officers of the court _______________________[LS] PROOF OF SERVICE Now comes ______________________________ with a. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS OR NON SLAVE OWNER UNDER THE FUGITIVE SLAVE ACT SEPTEMBER 18 ,1850 To be placed before the Clerk of Court of_______________________________________________ and this day of __________________ and month of____________________in the year of our Lord 2014 AD _________________________________[LS] CC
Posted on: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 01:51:15 +0000

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015