The United States is a corporation You are here: - TopicsExpress



          

The United States is a corporation You are here: abodia/2/United-States-is-a-corporation.htm US is a Corp. Supreme Court confirms Federal Zone (zip codes) District of Columbia, corporation possession of the Queen of England 1788 Original Constitution for the united states, original organic, of the people government. 1871 Amended version CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, US is a private corporation. The UNITED STATES was formed in 1871, which controls only the District of Columbia and the territories it purchases or acquires; Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands. Many think that income taxes, and some laws do not effect people in the sovereign states of the union as they are outside of the control / jurisdiction of the United States corporation. The United States of America is different from the United States [corporation]. The terms UNITED STATES and/or United States of America and/ or United States Government are all a private corporation, even with registered trademark. The US corporation (originally called the District of Columbia) does not effect or control the 50 sovereign states that are protected from the federal government by the US Constitution for the United States adopted in 1788. There are 2 United States, one formed in 1787, the collection of the several sovereign states of the union, and another separate and different one formed in 1871, which only controls the District of Columbia and it’s territories. Others may can give you specific references and explain this further. Here is an outline of the concepts. The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the Acts of the Forty-First Congress, Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia. This is also known as the Act of 1871. What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land. The Constitution for the United States of America was adopted on September 17, 1787, by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and ratified by conventions in each U.S. state in the name of The People. - - - caselaw.lp.findlaw/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=129&invol=141 U.S. Supreme Court STOUTENBURGH v. HENNICK, 129 U.S. 141 (1889) 129 U.S. 141 STOUTENBURGH, Intendant of Washington Asylum, v. HENNICK. January 14, 1889 Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871, entitled An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia, (16 St. 419,) are as follows: Section 1. That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act. Sec. 18. That the legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144] extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District, consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act, subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative assembly shall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the congress of the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to deprive congress of the power of legislation over said District in as ample manner as if this law had not been enacted. These sections are carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled An act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, relating to the District of Columbia, in force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three, as sections 2, 49, 50. - - - also note: And Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district not exceeding ten miles square, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States. And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First Congress passed an act entitled An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, legislating the organization of a municipal corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbia, the seat of government, which transferred the United States of America, the Republic, into a corporate entity entitled UNITED STATES, in capital letters, having no jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia. And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporation. This municipal corporation was granted the power to contract to provide municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of Article Four of the Constitution, any other person who chooses to contract for its services. - - Is there fraud in our ranks ? The Webster’s Dictionary states that Fraud means Deceit, Trickery, intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right. The Blacks Law Dictionary states pretty much what the Webster’s Dictionary does but adds about two pages full of information. My favorite part is: A false representation of a matter of fact, whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of that which should have been disclosed, which deceives and is intended to deceive another so that he shall act upon it to his legal injury. - - - - February 21, 1871 Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871* With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress, Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62). The act -- passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War -- was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America. Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States. The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the original Constitution for the united States (1788) was defaced in effect vandalized and sabotage when the title was capitalized and the word for was changed to of in the title THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (1871) is the constitution of the INCORPORATED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does is not ! Capitalization is significant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly minor alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans. What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original Constitution. Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the original Constitution, we the people now have relative rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereigns right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a privilege that requires citizens to be licensed. By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the original Constitution. - - - - supremelaw.org/decs/dccases/metrorrc.htm gives this discussion JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS District of Columbia On May 3rd, 1802 an Act was passed to incorporate the City of Washington. (2 Stat. at L. 195.) In 1871 an important modification was made in the form of the district government -- a Legislature was established, with all the apparatus of a distinct government. By the Act of February 21st, of that year, entitled An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia (16 Stat. at L. 419), it was enacted (sec. 1) that all that territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia by which name it was constituted a a body corporate for municipal purposes, with power to make contracts, sue and be sued, and to exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States. … This Constitution lasted until June 20th, 1874, when an Act was passed entitled An Act for the Government of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes. (18 Stat. at L. 116) By this Act the government established by the Act of 1871 was abolished. p 234 By a subsequent Act, approved June 11th, 1878 (20 Stat. at L. 102), it was enacted that the District of Columbia should remain and continue a municipal corporation, as provided in section two of the Revised Statutes relating to said District, and the appointment of commissioners was provided for, to have and to exercise similar powers given to the commissioners appointed under the Act of 1874. All rights of action and suits for and against the District were expressly preserved in status quo. p. 234 All municipal governments are but agencies of the superior power of the State or government by which they are constituted, and are invested with only such subordinate powers of local legislation and control as the superior Legislature sees fit to confer upon them. p. 234 The people are the recognized source of all authority, state or municipal, and to this authority it must come at last, whether immediately or by circuitous route. Barnes v. District of Columbia, 91 U.S. 540, 545 [23: 440, 441]. p 234 Chief Justice Marshall, speaking for this court, in the case of Hepburn v. Ellzey, 6 U.S. 2 Cranch, 445 [ 2:332 ], where the question was whether a citizen of the District could sue in the circuit courts of the United States as a citizen of a State. The court did not deny that the District of Columbia is a State in the sense of being a distinct political community; but held that the word State in the Constitution, where it extends the judicial power to cases between citizens of the several States, refers to the States of the Union. It is undoubtedly true that the District of Columbia is a separate political community in a certain sense, and in that sense may be called a State; but the sovereign power of this qualified State is not lodged in the corporation of the District of Columbia, but in the government of the United States. Its supreme legislative body is Congress. The subordinate legislative powers of a municipal character which have been or may lodged in the city corporations, or in the District of Columbia, do not make those bodies sovereign. - - - Text of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 ( a copy of the pages here:nikolasschiller/blog/index.php/archives/2009/01/30/2215/ - - - - The United States Isnt a Country —Its a Corporation ! by Lisa Guliani serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm more here: wariscrime/2009/01/15/news/the-usa-isnt-a-country-its-a-corporation/ - - - - - Constitution for the United States of America barefootsworld.net/constit1.html - - - - - - United States - US- U.S.-USA-America ( a possession of the Queen of England) Means: (A) a federal corporation . . . Title 28 USC Section 3002(5) Chapter 176. It is clear that the United States . . . is a corporation . . . 534 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT 724. `It is well settled that United States et al is a corporation, originally incorporated February 21, 1871 under the name District of Columbia, 16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62. It was reorganized June 11, 1878; a bankrupt organization per House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933, Senate Report 93-549, and Executive Orders 6072, 6102, and 6246; a de facto (define de facto) government, originally the ten square mile tract ceded by Maryland and Virginia and comprising Washington D. C., plus the possessions, territories, forts, and arsenals. The significance of this is that, as a corporation, the United States has no more authority to implement its laws against We The People than does Mac Donald Corporations, except for one thing -- the contracts weve signed as surety for our strawman with the United States and the Creditor Bankers. These contracts binding us together with the United States and the bankers are actually not with us, but with our artificial entity, or as they term it person, which appears to be us but spelled with ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. All this was done under, VICE-ADMIRALTY COURTS. In English Law. Courts established in the queens possessions beyond the seas, with jurisdiction over maritime causes, including those relating to prize. The United States of America is lawfully the possession of the English Crown per original commercial joint venture agreement between the colonies and the Crown, and the Constitution, which brought all the states (only) back under British ownership and rule. The American people, however, had sovereign standing in law, independent to any connection to the states or the Crown. This fact necessitated that the people be brought back, one at a time, under British Rule, and the commercial process was the method of choice in order to accomplish this task. First, through the 14th Amendment and then through the registration of our birth certificate and property. All courts in America are Vice-admiralty courts in the Crown’s private commerce. Supreme Law Library : The Federal Zone : index Supreme Law Library. The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue Electronic Eleventh Edition [Note: Small numbers indicate number of bytes in ... supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm 2. Supreme Law Firm The Supreme Law Firm holds informative seminars nationwide, and maintains the ... His massive book entitled The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal ... supremelaw.org/ - - - - - - The Illegal Quasi-Government in Washington D.C. The Federal Government is a Separate Nation and should be called the United States, Incorporated. home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/creator/federalgovernment.htm - - - - - - Fraud in government ? Wake up, learn, act, become a sovereign, free again nmcservices.net/governmentfraud.html If you doubt anything, learn to check it ! Go to Truth Seekers (below) At top left, click on Search Learn how to find anything quickly on internet w/ Thought Print © Back to Truth Seekers
Posted on: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:10:35 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015