This article is posted with a disclaimer, the title is misleading - TopicsExpress



          

This article is posted with a disclaimer, the title is misleading and some of the data is unchecked, but we feel a responsibility to bring all sides of the story to our viewers - admin The new revelations about the amount of water leaking from the plant have caused a stir in the international community and led to additional scrutiny of Pacific Ocean seafood. Last week, South Korea announced it had banned all imports of Japanese seafood from a large area around Fukushima. And Al Jazeera reported that the cost to the region’s fishing industry over the past two years exceeds $3.5 billion. Now, fears are mounting that the radiation could lead to dangerous contamination levels in seafood from more of the Pacific Basin. Numerous blog posts and articles expressed concern about the potential for higher concentrations of radioactive particles, particularly in highly migratory species such as tuna that may have encountered Fukushima’s isotopes—including highly dangerous and toxic materials such as cesium-137, strontium-90, and iodine-131—on their transoceanic travels. Some studies predict that over the next 5 to 10 years, concentrations on the North American Pacific Coast could actually be higher than those off Japan, but the total amount of radioactivity will be well below the current levels near the crippled nuclear plant because of dilution throughout the Pacific Basin. See more….newswatch.nationalgeographic/2013/09/11/fukushima-fallout-not-affecting-u-s-caught-fish/
Posted on: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 16:46:23 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015