Tuned in to George zimmermans trial and wondering how some people can really get up there and say this dude had a right to take a unarmed kids life because they had had a rash of burgalaries go on in the neighborhood and he wasnt gonna have another one happen on his watch Sounds like b.s. to me If im the juror guilty. prove he burgled a home or car he had no gloves there would be evidence right or wrong..
Posted on: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:53:41 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics