Как быстренько все ни слова о нобелевке. Transparency or not transparency. ABOUT THE PLOT AGAINST MY DISCOVERIES AND MY PERSONALITY. 10 minutes of truth. Korejsha A.O. Combating cash and political corruption is not only struggle against corruption and search the ecological niche sometimes. Now the main habitat of corruption is KNOWLEDGE, as the corruption in science is harder. What is difference for people that which the Sun revolves around the Earth or vice versa. But this decision depended all our life. But there, freedom of speech attached importance. Politicians are not interested such freedom of speech. But there is theme, like the structure of the Solar system that affect the lives of all people and all people face at every step. But politicians don’t have to this case. Now science has become productive force and also totalitarian. So, as I believe, it is not by chance that the specialist on nuclear physics and high energy physic, ak. Velikhov was appointed as Chairman of the public Council under the President of Russia, where there is an urgent need to combat corruption in all areas. He is main corrupt person in the country. I will try to prove it. DOCUMENT № 1. “A.O. Koreisha. GENERALIZATION OF NEWTON’S EQUATION OF MOTION FOR THE ONTOLOGICAL BASIS. SHORT VERSION. 1960-10.12.80.” “I, Jakshina G.B. Berdskoj State notary of the State Notary of the Novosibirsk region, certify that the 23 of January, one thousand nine hundred and eighty-first year at 9:40 local time current paper presented to me in this State Notery by Koreisha Alexandr Olegovich living in the city of Berdsk, Sedova, 53. The identity document is mandatory. Registered in the register № 277. Recovered State fee 50 kopeks notary public G.B. Jakshina. Laced up and sealed with a numbered, stamped twenty-seven sheets”. At first I shell quote from a textbook when physics was being honest (Y.B.Rumer, M.S. Ruvkin. Theory of relativity. Uchpedgiz. 1960, p.174-175). “ The person faces the fundamental fact from the first steps of him existence: The heavier body (e. i. the more its gravitational mass), the harder to change its movement, the more its inert mass. So, the idea about identity of the inertial mass and gravitational mass is proportional each other such firmly rooted in people’s minds that we forget that we are dealing with completely different properties of the body. So you should be clear that the proportionality of gravitational and inertial mass is by no means obvious, self-evident law (It was for us during centures-old habit of mankind to this circumstance), and one is determined empirically fact”. For gravitation theory of Einstein and his followers (Y.B. Roemer stadied in Giotingen and was a colleague of L.D. Landau) as justification the General theory of relativity. So the gravitational mass, i.e. the gravitational charge solids and particles, creates its own gravitational field and is proportional to inertial mass. In other words, the greater the gravitational charge of the body, the more powerful of the body’s own gravitational field, and the more resistance of the body to change its state of motion. Hence I make a completely different to General relativity conclusion: “The gravitational field is the link between the gravitational charge the body with an inert mass of the body. In other words, a source of inertia of the body and particles is ITS OWN GRAVITATIONAL FIELD”. But the basis of the proof and obtaining the new equations of motion were numerous and substantial evidence of physical reality forces of inertia, in particular, the centrifugal forces of inertia, resulting in accelerated motion of bodies. From the point of view of physics and relativity, inertial forces are fictitious forces. The same textbook says: “Note that in classical mechanics the inertia force is fictitious force because you dissociate it from any real interaction between solids and gravitational field and is introduced formally in order to maintain the first and the second Newton’s law (p.181). So the gravitational mass, i.e. the gravitational charge of solids and particles, creates its own gravitational field and proportional to inertial mass. In other words, the greater the gravitational charge of the body, the more powerful of the body’s own gravitational field, and the more the resistance of the body to change its state of motion. From here I make a completely different relative to General relativity the conclusion: “Gravitational field is link between the gravitational charge the body with an inert body mass. In other words, A SOURCE OF INERTIA OF THE BODY AND PARTICLES ARE ITS OWN GRAVITATIONAL FIELD “. On the basis of the proof and obtaining the new equations of motion were numerous and substantiated evidence of physical reality of the inertia forces resulting in accelerated motion of bodies, in particular, the centrifugal forces of inertia. From the point of view of physics and relativity the inertial forces are fictitious forces. The same textbook says: "Note, in the classical mechanics the INERTIA FORCE is a FICTITIOUS FORCE because you don’t bound it from any REAL INTERACTION BETWEEN solids and is INTRODUCED FORMALLY in order to maintain the SECOND and the FIRST LAW of NEWTON" (p. 181). This is, the apparent absence of real interaction was the cause that the solution to the Newton’s problem of motion came over the minds of physicists and also the impressive achievements of celestial mechanics, the discoveries of new planets, hooked the new Newton’s achievements. In the General relativity the gravitational fields are the true and inertial forces are fictitious. Moreover, I found the physical experiment, which have refuted to the principle of equivalence, is electric-magnetic radiation under the accelerated motion of the body. And the charged body is situated in the gravitational field don’t radiation while the principle of equivalence categorically states: “No physical experiment being in laboratory don’t distinguish between cases where the laboratory is moving forward with constant acceleration without a gravitation field and the case where the laboratory is located at rest (or moves uniformly in a straight line) in a constant and uniform gravitational field. (p.183) So, there is my radical refusal with all of modern physics to requires changing the paradigm of physics and the completely different picture of the world have appeared. It could not ignore the tops of the USSR with the dominant of nuclear physics, and outright falsification of physical knowledge began. In 1984 the project was created and made available the first collider billions and in 1986 as reaction to my 1, 2, 3 paper (see below) was called the “All-Union meeting with teachers of classical mechanics” by Institute of theoretical mechanics of Academy of Sciences of the USSR where the head was the main theorist of classical mechanics in space program Ishlinsky A. Y.. They needed urgently to strengthen the mental dam. Living water began to tear down the artificial stereotypes. DOCUMENT №2. “A. Koreisha. ABOUT ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY SOURCE”. “I am Jakshina G.B. , Berdskoj State notary of the State Notery Office of the Novosibirsk region, certifythat the 23 of January, one thousand nine handred and eighty-first year at 9:50 local time, this document brought me into this State notary by ce-n Korejsha Alexander Olegovich living in the city of Berdsk, Sedova 53. the identity document is mandatory. Registered in №278. Recovered 50 kopeks stamp duty. Notary public G.B. Jakshina. Laced up and sealed with a numbered, stamped sixteen sheets”. DOCUMENT №3. “A. KOREJSHA. “A BASIC MISTAKE OF NEWTON, A LEGACY OF MODERN PHYSICS”. “I am Bushukova L.F. senior State notary of the Novosibirsk Soviet State notary office, certify that the March 14, 1985, 2:30 pm, this document in the designated notarial Office by ce-n Korejsha Alexandr Olegovich submitting Passport series SH-LA №560147 living on the street Rashian 35, kv. 909. the identity document is submitted. Registered in the Regis ter №2980. Recovered 50 kop. Laced up and sealed with a numbered, stamped five sheets”. How was my participation in the All-Union meeting on teaching theoretical mechanics. It started when I sent my article on a fundamental error of Newton in the Institute of theoretical mechanics to publish it in the journal of the Institute. After some time the Secretary reported they could not publish my article but it will soon take place All-Union meeting on teaching and they invited me to attend the meeting. I was glad and at the appointed time I arrived in Moscow with financial assistance from the society of inventors of Novosibirsk. I expected, as usual, be published in the proceedings of the meeting. I was even gave 5 minutes to report during discussing reports by the experienced mechanics. But it was not published here. As it turned out, the all teacher were tentatively instructed to produce preprints of their articles in their facilities but not warned me about this. I just shook an air and some cunning teachers keep in mind my scientific proof. Here’s how subtly done in the Moscow scientific circles. The scientific creative brethren watched vigilantly in order to I would no inadvertently slipped through. But I’m not as they crawled around on my belly and led an active propaganda without any harmful publications. In keep silent about my discoveries, many scientific and science-popular magazines in USSR, as “Technology-youth”, “Knowledge is pover”, “Science and life”, “Chemistry and life”, in generally, all denied publishing my popular articles and notes. But then for dreamers all journals were open as gateway and any was printed without restriction and it is desirable with thin, for dedicated, hints. But all this is a crime against the person. Only when all began to collapse I was able to publish the preprint “The new model of bundles “subject-object”: ontological aspect” in the Institute of philosophy, history and philology of Siberian Branch AS USSR. It was a methodological results of my job which I worked during the 1971 to 1977 years, which led to more successful reflection of the previous period of my physics. Corruption in science is amazingly absurd because of all the other people on the planet – it’s cattle and they can be deceived even to 10 billionth. I am not claiming that the particle X doesn’t exist. I see her trying to use to assign yourself to my discoveries, slightly alter and cast the Nobel medal. But of course, not in this case. It is important to preserve jobs for themselves end financing. 1 million dollars from the Nobel Prize is not enough. ROB EINSTEIN – their trend. So they start subtly try to explain the inertia of bodies on the fingers using particle X, ostensibly to fill the entire infinite universe. Their lie begins with the fact that they negate gravity and Einstein’s theory, but is talking about the Big Bang which follows from the theory of relativity. You must to choose what you accept as truth but mix on their speculation to furtively theory which you deny, imply that physicists could all swallow and consider their how rednecks. ROB MY DISCOVERIES – their main task. It is question about the forces of inertia that we all face as frequently as with the movement of the Sun across the sky over. I honestly refutes Einstein and all investigators with a great explosion. The gravitation field is gave rise to the gravitational charge, whose existence is proofed as tightly as the electrical charge by the direct measurements of the pendulum. The inert mass is proportional to the gravitational mass, as all bodies fall to the ground with a constant acceleration. Therefore, the greater the gravitational charge, the greater the gravitational force field generated by them and the greater the inertia of the body. From here I make a natural conclusion that the INERTIA of the BODY is the RESULT of INTERECTION of the BODY with its OWN GRAVITATIONAL FIELD. These relativistic scammers try to steal my discovery, by substituting for the Higgs particles, gravitational field and forced to build a false concept of inertia particles. They don’t talk about the force of inertia until I alive because my proof of reality forces of inertia, i.e. resistance to bodies of outside forces does not depend on the nature of inertia, i.e. it is an objective fact. I have used torsion pendulum, proved it strictly and proved that inertia forces is variables. Of course, one must demand that It will repeated my experiment that I strictly documented and preserved their digital recording, as a natural product of the experiment. All this is contained in my articles and brochures and all certified by notary and ,recently, at the Institute of intellectual property. 1. Korejsha A.O. GENARALIZATIONOF NEWTON’S EQUATION OF MOTION OR NEW PARADIGM PHYSICISTS. New concept of the physical nature of the force of inertia. “Astroprint”, Odessa, 1997. The article was written July 11. 1997, but nobody wanted to publish it. Published, like all the others, at his own expense. 2. Korejsha A.O. INERTIAL FORCES – “HIDDEN PARAMETR” PHYSICS. “Negotiant Studio”. Odessa, 2002. 3. Korejsha A.O. NEW MECHANICS AND ELECTRODYNAMICS. CHANGE PHISICS PARADIGMS. Odessa, INVAC, 2012. At first, I think, it’s not the Higgs theory? As he introduced the theory of elementary particles in the 60-ies and until recently this was not heard and nothing links to the inertia of the Higgs theory, as far as I know. This is after my discoveries have appeared speculations of relativists-falsifiers. First, The existence of the gravitational charge does not explain by relativists – falsifiers, since the Higgs particle exist outside matter and occupy the entire infinite universe. Secondly, they explain the nature of inertia that a particle moving in a Higgs particles are experiencing resistance something like the force of friction on the part the Higgs particles without mass. This in itself is absurd. But there is a deeper conflict with facts. Let’s start with the fact that all planetary bodies would fall with crashing into each other. The bodies demanded the application of strength to compensate for the friction of the Higgs particle for their uniform motion. So they don’t say aloud that forces of inertia are tremendous, that its tear the flywheels, turbine and different mechanisms. But the inertia forces are those forces which manifest themselves into external forces to change its state of rest or motion. Here’s swamp where the swindlers-relativists stuck trying to justify the hounding of my discoveries and hounding me as an individual. They should be forced to talk about the forces of inertia and then even the most illiterate motorists will see that scammers-relativists are responsible for the casualties on roads blocking the 30 years my theory of inertia forces. In fact in the latest brochure of new electromagnetic source of electromagnetic energy and new propulsion schemas that should solve the problem of ground traffic. They are direct perpetrators of Chernoble and Fukushima and perhaps developments will cause their ringleaders-academicians will sit down in the dock. There would be new Nurenberg due to corruption, obscurantism and vandalism. Civilization will not forgive them, and their supporters leading away public attention to the problem of corruption, blocking my revelations of corruption in the field of ideas – the thousandfold more dangerous and also accompanied by monetary corruption. If anyone thinks I’m distort a scientific point of view, then I suggest the text from the page kp.ua.: “4 July Peter Higgs (pictured it right) came to CERN to make sure-the boson is found. Now wating for the Nobel Prize. Next to him, Francois Englert, another contender for the Nobel Prise and Rolf Heuer, Director General of the concern. British scientist Peter Higgs lived to triumph: July 4, 2012 the year of physics around the world announced that particle, named after his name seem to be found. Peter BOSONS – 13.07.2012. About this news week everywhere were cheering not only scientists, but also journalists, and in general all and sundry. Only no one explained in simple human words-but what is that thing had opened. And why, exactly, this noise? Now we will try to do the impossibly-explain in their own words thing and not all physicist are able to understand. And the Director of the Institute of nuclear research of the Russian Academy of Sciences Victor Matveev will help us in this. Here we omit the forty-page report that back in 1964 by Peter Higgs predicted the existence of elementary particles – a boson that gives mass to other particles (because otherwise it is not clear where this weight is taken)… For the sake that the capture of this mysterious particles built up 10 billion Large Hadron Collider… (And what about quanta and Muon do not ask and do not remember). And here for further explanation what is a boson, - remember for erudition. -Put on the table a handful of foam bolls, - Professor Matveev begins his explanation- they will be portray of the fundamental particles(that is, the smallest indivisible particles that make up atoms, the core of which is matter and all around. – Editor’s note. They have little or no weight. Blow and scatter. But in reality, the elementary particles do not scatter. Means that something is holding back, giving them their weight? We continuum to experience. We’ll pour water on the table, add foam and again slightly blow. We will see that the balls run up very reluctantly. They seem to feel shrunken. This failure occurs because particles are penetrates when moving through the water, which is the Higgs field in this analogy. If we blow to water without the foam balls then ripples run over the surface – it will be a counterpart of bosons. Using a similar analogy can be explained and practical application of discoveries. If you learn to tidy up “water”, that is, Higgs’s field, the elementary particles will lose weight. And, therefore, lose some weight and matter of which they are composed. Do you catch up benefits? No? Well, then even easier-plane, constructed of material of which the Higgs bosons were removed to fly without motors. Yes, that is simply a pies of metal would hang in the air. That is, finally we will invent antigravity which predicted only in the most fantastic novels. Well, now, with fingers and foams, we have explained the Higgs boson, if you can’t throw tomatoes”. Professor gets confused all the time. He said mass, other time he said weight. When you talk about the weight then it’s attraction to Earth, but simply mass is not. There are two masses: inert mass and gravitational mass, in other words , the gravitational charge. Here’s this gravitational charge, that has the gravitational radius, prevents particles fly apart. Professor writes that matter when driving one is sifting through the water which is the Higgs field. This is what I criticized above is the friction of the Higgs particle and it has not meaning mechanism of friction, importantly that Galileo’s principle does not exist and that the concept of the Higgs friction is the principle of Aristotle to the particle moved to put to it. It turns out that if you pull the body of the rope and feel the rope pulling you back, then it is the Higgs field. If so, it means that Professor not having necessary words deftly acknowledges that the two forces acting on the body: the external force and the force from Higgs particles that is the force of inertia. Present or it is a rough plagiarism or it proves that such a mechanism was already published the description priority 1978-79 years. But it is not like, since thirty years passed and all textbooks of general physics continued to lie to us that the forces of inertia of the fictitious. They should be responsible for plagiarism under the law or lie to students. But that is not enough. The Higgs mechanism is fake because the force of inertia, i.e. force applied to the rope and the body is equally to the external force. Then whence acceleration comes up according to the second law of Newton and comes up direct experiment. I just run into this problem and made the conclusion that the force of inertia variable varies from zero to the value of the external force and the source of it is own gravitational field. In other words, oscillatory process occures when inertial forces, i.e. frictional force of its own gravity field balance external force, and then repeats the process at first, but the speed is increased for every swing. So let’s formulate alternative: 1. The existence of inertial mass is dependent on the external environment, i.e. Higgs particles and, therefore without en applied external force any body cannot move, at least for a long time because of the friction of the Higgs particles prevents process moving. The planets, the Moon should rapidly fall into the Sun, the friction force is enormous and the movement of the elliptical. 2. The existence of inertial depends on the gravitational field that any body brings with it and therefore the body can move uniformly indefinitely if it does not act outside force which makes offset the body its own gravitational field. Consequently, the body may also indefinitely move with acceleration if a external force with the force of the owe gravitational field creates their own vibration process in which the body acquires additional speed with portions. This is what I have proven using a large torsion pendulum with large masses. Professor, how do you feel – this is similar to rotten tomatoes? In my opinion tomatoes is fresh of which you yourself are trying to prepare the Nobel salad. Well, it doesn’t matter, you or your colleagues with your help of the Director of the Institute of nuclear energy. The journalist, Y.Latynina has already responded to these large scientists but little individual. That what she said on the radio echo.msk.ru: “Well, that’s the story. That’s what these men are guilty, 6 scientists? They remained silent when in their presence official began to interpret them. So, I repeat. I can’t say that that great guilty. But this type of discourse which is very characteristic in modern times for these pseudoscience circles serving the interests of the bureaucracy. And this type of discourse is precisely that since science has dealt with probabilistic things, that’s not like Newton’s apple falls on such and such a trajectory, but “maybe yes, maybe no”. Here’s how the science says one thing, and then the scientists, bureaucrats are beginning to translate it to your language and somehow in the process of spoilt phone is overturned to the opposite opinion. Here’s a look, as, for example, it is the discourse about global warming. Here, there is one of the symbols of the faith’s teachings is the story of global warming is an increase in the number of natural catastrophes. Small problem: there are no statistics to confirm this. Even the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), bureaucratic organization set up by the UN, main oracle on part of global warming, even in its report (section for the main part and the summary for policymakers), that is, in the main report states that there is no trend, and in the summary for policymakers said “well you know, and will increase disaster very likely”. And the head of the IPCC Rajendra Pachauri has said in an interview: “This is all happening befor our eyes. Disasters are increasing”. Recently in the Scolcovo it was executed experiment as some scientists are willing to go far in his servilizme in front of the bureaucracy. By the way, I must say that most of the scientists involved in the experiment are just specialists all over this green power, renewable energy and other things and shows an example of Solindry, and an example of Rosnano, perfectly fed by the State. TThere was even one Eagle Rodney John Alam, recipient of the Nobel Prize but with Al Gore. But he had a Bachelor’s degree in chemistry. And here these guys are held a Conference on the perpetum mobile. It’s literally called “Energy dialogue perpetual motion machine: from science fiction to the innovations of the century”. That is, I hope, of course, that any of the invited just flatly refused to come. Well, it’s the same that the historian to come for a Conference on Holocaust denial. But, all the same, 27 speakers from 10 countries, all-winners annually handed Russian President Global Energy Prize. By the way, the prize is 1 million dollars is apparently uncomfortable giving refuse. They came to the Conference with such a title. They would prefer to pretend that it means, they say, Russians say that journalists does not understand and, in general, you know, under the perpetual engine refers to renewable energy. So, there was this wonderful Icelander, who spoke from the stage now: we stand on the threshold of the third technological revolution. The first revolution was the steam engine, the second transistor, today – renewable fuels, smart green everlasting energy. For example, if on the discussion of global energy wrote to Putin that the Icelandic physicist Sigfusson, who, of course, naturally, already 15 years in all commissions as bureaucrat, that he developed a perpetual motion machine, but you should give him half a billion on experiments. That’s interesting, Mr Sigfusson troubled that its not so misunderstood, or keep silent how the Italians remained silent? Here it’s a very serious problem when scientific discourse ceases to be scientific and begins to be bureaucratic. All the best”. This whole Conference looks as if the Pope suddenly began to create namaz in front of an audience at the Vatican. Y.Latynina have remarked a very important trend, though doubted that she knew nothing about that war, described incompletely above, waged and conduct research bureaucrats with my fundamental discoveries made in 1978-79 years. Following these discoveries rushed through many years a large number of practical enthusiasts they prefer to pretend that they fell from a oven and suddenly it dawned upon they. Until my discoveries nobody claimed that the law of conservation of energy or, otherwise, the first law of thermodynamics can be violated on a large scale. Early there have been attempts to refute the second law of thermodynamics by using a perpetual second kind, i.e. converting thermal chaos in high quality energy without the costs of work efficiency greater than one. For many years I am sending my brochures even schemes of electro-magnetic sources that are both engines even to UNESCO and all national commissions of UNESCO worldwide. Some of which allegedly produced by the above mentioned enthusiasts and I’ve already seen how supposedly working on the Internet. But now science bureaucrats, finders Nobel prizes seem is compelled because I started distribute my last discovery and model, not for the first time, among the people by means of leaflets and posters, have decided to withdraw the criminal prohibition of perpetuum, but not giving up chase for billions and rotten prestige, and began appropriate of both my discovery of 1978-79 years. Seems the sad experience with BAC have not taught them, but rather provoked the desperate, secured by millions dollars, falsification reider capture my efforts and achievements. But I think that, as with the BAC, they sit down in a deep puddle. Two month ago I sent my last discovery at UNESCO in a booklet called “The forces of inertial – a boundless source of energy” that is synthesis of the discoverieson the 1978-79 y.: power electro-magnetic field is the field energy source, but not mediator, and the generalization of Newton’s equations of motion. New concept of nature of forces of inertia”. It was accompanied with a booklet that I have sent this year in UNESCO, The New mechanics and electrodynamics. Change physics paradigm” where it was presented the experiments with torsion pendulum to study it character motion. These experiments have made Large Hadron Collider as example of super expensive and totally unnecessary experiment. But here’s continuation of this corrupt history which involved editor of the Moscow magazine “The New Times”. Any conflict deal comes a such condition when a participant of it, being pushed to the wall, to show its true face without photoshop. Now just such a situation occurred in the Moscow magazine “The New Times”, where as the editor is E. Albats. During the year, or more. I have actively participated in the work of the magazine commenting on the articles and offering new hot topics for the Forum which has been visited by participants of the Forum. For example, only at the categories the Forum “Culture” was about ten thousand visitors and, in general, including other categories there are around twenty thousand. For example, the theme is “How to struggle against fascism by means culture” has about 2500 visits. I believe that this topic is actual not only in the nuclear state such Russia but also in neighbouring countries. However, recently in the magazine I was faced with a seemingly odd fact. My themes, which gained more than 1000 visits suddenly disappeared. Following my protests they returned but were reset counter. Generally speaking, the number of visits is such a factor that attracts visitors. Apparently, this didn’t sute to direction of the magazine. Further with great accuracy confirmed this assumption. Soon again suddenly the Forum disappeared completely with staggered.- first as a rubric, and its history can be found through internet search and then vanished without a trace, along with all the themes. I insisted that the theme of the Forum is the principal intellectual property and delete the Forum without warning, making it possible to retain its texts, the violation of the principle of private property and intellectual property. I still managed to keep some of the texts from the Culture and all rest sank without a trace. I compare “The New Times” actions as preparation for fascist acts as a specific methodology on the Internet aimed against me and those who come in conflict with some fascist groups. Albats has proved herself fully, and I think, the development will force and others who still have imitated human rights activity openly demonstrate himself. It is not about slogans, but in the action which covered by slogans and human right rhetoric. The Conclusion. Here the evidence and facts were given of bureaucratic infractions the fundamental right to life by science circles during more than 30 years. With this aassociated my individual right enshrined in article 27 of the Universal Declaration of human rights, the right of people to create work and their right to enjoy the benefits of their labour. Not only official instance, but also public bodies will be put before a choice whether to stay in the same as indifferent observers of the destruction of the very basics of civilization encouraging corporate the corrupt actions of scientific bureaucracy, ignoring the principle of freedom of speech or take the path of revival of the ideal of personal freedom as a sourceof important new discoveries in all fields of culture without which civilization cannot exist. 20.11.2012 y. .
Posted on: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 19:42:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015