07, Agreement This solidifies the following agreements between the below two signatories. One agrees to train two as an apprentice in law and litigation tactic and strategy. One agrees to “tailor” two’s apprenticeship around two, two’s schedule and two’s other “single, full time working mother” responsibilities. One agrees to train two in an array of interactive reality scenarios in both the federal and state lit sectors through a “personalized, learn as you go” approach. Specifically, one agrees to train two in: Lit Writing, Research, Investigation and Prep A) Constitutional Law; B) US Citizenship Obligation; C) US Citizenship - “Patent” Breaches; D) US Class Action Litigation – Big Fees; E) Partnership and Divorce Law - Citizenship; F) Contracts, Price Economic Law – Duty to “us”; and G) Civil and Criminal Procedure and Law 101-105, e.g. Two agrees to apprentice for “as long as it takes” in two’s “spare time”, between working and parenting full time, and other “single mother” responsibilities. Two agrees to work on her English: writing, mechanics and other business communication skills. Two agrees to pass my originally authored written material that she learns to her children and her family. Two also agrees that, if her training is “successful” (from one’s view), two will commit to a 50/50 percent legal partnership (of “one hundred percent” of what is one’s). One is to be the ultimate “decider” about “lit work product tasks”. Central to one’s ongoing business enterprise is Mark Solomon, one of one’s trainers and counsel to both the United States and United Kingdom in contract price tag validity matters; price tag validity assessment of all things are always constitutional points. This formal relation automatically arise, effective date being date on this dual signed writing. One retains the right to render the “back dating” ineffective by notarized writing. A basis for one rendering the “dating back” inoperative could be, e.g., two’s failure to produce and communicate hard monetary results based on one’s written work product - and other valuable capital one brings to the table. One heads “All Written Product”. Two is to control Bonas related contracts, transactions, settlements, collections and elements she deems in the best interests of her family and this partnerships. Three basic, unbendable rule sequences, shall govern this relation and all business related engagements pursuant thereto: I. Citizenship Supremacy Obligations A) 15 USC, §17: A … human being is not an all capitalized name, UCC commodity or article of commerce. B) “Citizenship of the real party … controls in deciding whether … jurisdiction exists.” C) “The State … is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” D) “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme law of the land; … judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.” E) “The duty is to declare and enforce the rule of the supreme law and reject that of an inferior act of legislation which,” transcending the Constitution is of no effect and binding on no one.” F) “Standing is founded in concern about the proper--and properly limited--role of the courts in an American democratic society. G) It will be an evil day … if the theory of a government outside supreme law finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. H) “Citizens who are not United citizens … shall be considered aliens.” A military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides. United States Military … shall guarantee to everyone … in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot convene), against domestic Judge Violence. Date: 05-28-07 Date: 07-11-07 “Cash” Lumbermen’s Mut. Cas. Co. v. Elbert, 348 U.S. 48, 51 (1954). CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 3, Section 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2! Adkins v. Children’s Hospital of District of Columbia, 261 U.S. 525, 544 (1923). Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 501 (1974). Downs v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901). Hooven & Allison Co. vs Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945). Executive Order No.10834, signed on August 21, 1959 and printed in the Federal Register at 24 F.R. 6865 Article 3 Section 4. https://youtube/watch?v=emeWjawS1eY
Posted on: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 20:18:47 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015