1st Human or Natural right – No person shall be condemned unheard. Will a Court of any Country deny this right on secular, religious grounds ? . According to Biblical Old Testament, 1st Ecclesiastical Natural or Human Right is “ No person shall be condemned unheard” which subsequently scintillated into a legal right widely practiced by Judiciary all over World, . The origin of this right is “Lord God inquired about consumption of The Fruit of Forbidden Tree by Adam and Eve. Lord God taken explanations of both Adam and Eve to fix the offence of disobeying His Divine Order; concluded that Adam committed the offence at the instigation, abettment and perpetration of Eve on ill advice of Satan tempting to have Wisdom, . Finally, after thorough hearing on both sides, Lord God delivered His Lordships Judgment imposing punishment upon Adam and Eve - to deny them from immortality; to throw them away from Heavenly Eden Gardens unto Earth; cursed them to suffer from pains, miseries, natural calamities; and some additional curses to Eve on her role, all femininity on the Earth”, . This ecclesiastical right transformed into a Human Right first and later as a legal right through Statutory Civil, Criminal procedural laws in India; so, an exparte final Judgment of even the Apex Court is liable to be set-aside to hear the matter in fresh from Trial Stage. Court has no authority to violate this ancient ecclesiastical turned legal principle emanated from Religious Scriptures. Can Apex Court of India or Any County declare that it can be followed because it is originated in Religious Scriptures ? . Unfortunately, Indian Legal System is not yet nationalised; not freed from the influence of exotic jurisprudence; not following vast abundantly rich, superior and sophisticated native Jurisprudence of Bharath Scriptures. Even, Lord Sri Rama, Lord Sri Krishna executed native Jurisprudence but Neo Lords of Justice are not even able to understand Indian Jurisprudence emanated from Ancient immemorial Vedic, Sanskrit Scriptures. Heads of Village Panchayats execute native laws more than Higher Courts in India ! . For ex: in Sethu Samudram Project Case - Questioning the authenticity of Holy Ramayana will show case level of Indian Higher Judiciary standards, especially of The Supreme Court of India ! Lord Sri Rama, Lord Hanuman or Maharshi Valmiki to give evidence as witnesses of Sethu before SCI. Judiciary is respected only for its qualitative Verdicts, not for Judges.
Posted on: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:03:35 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015