99: The Complainant relies upon his Legitimate Expectation under International Law, that, until such times as the agents, assigns, officers and representatives of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/ “NATION STATE AUSTRALIA”/ ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN AUSTRALIA have provided the evidence sought by the Complainant evidencing the authority of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/ “NATION STATE AUSTRALIA”/ ROMAN CATHOLIC CHUCH , its’ agents, assigns, officers and representatives, that He has the right to legitimately expect that the legal position, as the Complainant puts forth in this NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION, is true and correct. 100: The Complainant relies upon the fact that, 100.1: if the Complainants’ understanding of the Constitutional situation in Australia – as detailed herein – is incorrect, the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/ “NATION STATE AUSTRALIA”/ ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN AUSTRALIA, its agents, assigns, officers and representatives have a Duty of Care Obligation to the Plaintiff to detail their evidence to the contrary to the Complainant. 101: For the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/ “NATION STATE AUSTRALIA” to fail to provide the requested documented evidence of the Head of authority of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/ “NATION STATE AUSTRALIA” to the Complainant, whilst patently, clearly knowing the Complainant was waiting upon such information to be provided in order to make a decision(s) (based upon such information if it could be provided) to comply with the laws the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/ “NATION STATE AUSTRALIA” purport to be legitimate, and then after failing to provide such information, to summarily deprive the Complainant of his rights pursuant to International Law is both: 101.1: negligent, and 101.2: incompetent, and, 101.3: criminal, and, 101.4: illegal, and, 101.5: damaging to the Complainant. 102: The “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/ “NATION STATE AUSTRALIA” owes a Duty of Care to the Complainant to provide the evidence that the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/ “NATION STATE AUSTRALIA” relies upon, to evidence its’ Head of authority etc.., immediately, prior to further exercising its’ illegal statute and other laws and its’ absent jurisdiction against the Complainant. 20. 103: The Complainant has, in writing, verbally and by action, notified the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” that the Complainant has no intention of breaching any reasonable LAWFUL Law. 104: The Complainant has no intention of recognizing nor complying with any law which derives its’ authority from: 104.1: a foreign power, and or, 104.2: a foreign government, and or, 104.3: an illegal government. 105: The Complainant has every intention of defending his Human Rights, including those as recognized under International Law. 106: The Complainant intends to, 106.1: comply with Common Law, and, 106.2: comply with legitimate statute law, and, 106.3: live peaceably with his fellow Sovereign Independent Individual, Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian Citizens. 107: The Complainant, has never had, does not have, and cannot perceive a time when, the Complainant has, does or will willfully breach any law that can be evidenced to be lawful and enforceable in respect of the Complainant pursuant to International Law (the same basis upon which Australia as part of the “coalition of the willing” entered Iraq). 108: In the High Courts’ Teoh case the majority extended this principle to say that unincorporated treaties could give rise to a legitimate expectation that decision-makers would act in accordance with the Convention. The following extracts indicate the approach that was adopted. 108.1: Mason CJ and Deane J said: ‘ratification by Australia of an international Convention is not to be dismissed as a merely platitudinous or ineffectual act, particularly when the instrument evidences internationally accepted standards to be applied by courts and administrative authorities………………. Rather, ratification of a Convention is a positive statement by the executive government of this country to the world and to the Australian people that the executive government and its agencies will act in accordance with the Convention. It is not necessary that a person seeking to set up such a legitimate expectation should be aware of the Convention or should personally entertain the expectation; it is enough that the expectation is reasonable in the sense that there are adequate materials to support it.’ 21. 109: SECT 6 of the British “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK)”, states: 109.1:6. “The Commonwealth” shall mean the Commonwealth of Australia as established under this Act. “The States” shall mean such of the colonies of New South Wales, New Zealand, Queensland, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia, and South Australia, including the northern territory of South Australia, as for the time being are parts of the Commonwealth, and such colonies or territories as may be admitted into or established by the Commonwealth as States; and each of such parts of the Commonwealth shall be called “a State.” 110: Section 80 of the Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 UK” states: 110.1: Trial by jury 80. The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth shall be by jury, and every such trial shall be held in the State where the offence was committed, and if the offence was not committed within any State the trial shall be held at such place or places as the Parliament prescribes. 111: Pursuant to the above facts the Complainant is not legally bound to acknowledge the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/“NATION STATE AUSTRALIA” or “STATE OF QUEENSLAND/NATION STATE AUSTRALIA government” agent, assign, officer or representative as having been created pursuant to any legal authority or created upon any legal basis, unless and until the requested documented evidence of such purported legal authority is provided and the Complainant has been afforded an opportunity to validate or disprove such evidence. Pursuant to the above facts: The Complainant DEMANDS: 1: That the matters concerning the Complainant be held Sine Die (including all correspondence, Judgments, orders and or actions) until the STATE OF QUEENSLAND/NATION STATE AUSTRALIA/ ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN AUSTRALIA satisfies the Complainants’ valid concerns regarding the: 1.1: Source of power, and, . 1.2: Head of power, and, 1.3: Authority 22. of the STATE OF QUEENSLAND/ NATION STATE AUSTRALIA/ ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH over the Complainant. 2: That, in relation to the Complainant, before ANY further legal action is commenced and or continued by the STATE OF QUEENSLAND/ NATION STATE AUSTRALIA/ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, that the STATE OF QUEENSLAND/ NATION STATE AUSTRALIA/ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH provide to the Complainant those documents which are required and necessary to prove the claim to jurisdiction over the Complainant, including: 2.1: Letters Patent establishing the “Office of Governor – General for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Irelands’ Colony of The Commonwealth of Australia” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England. 2.2: Letters Patent establishing the “Colony of QUEENSLAND” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto 2.3: Letters Patent establishing the “Office of Governor for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland’s Colony of QUEENSLAND” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England. 2.4: The Writ of Commission for the “Governor General of The UK Colony of the Commonwealth of Australia” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England. 2.5: The Writ of Commission for the “Governor of The UK Colony of QUEENSLAND”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England. 23. 2.6: The Writ of Commission for the “Chief Justice of the UK Colony of The Commonwealth of Australia”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England. 2.7: The Writ of Commission for the “Chief Justice of The UK Colony of STATE OF QUEENSLAND”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England. 2.8: The Writ of Commission for the Police Commissioner of the “UK Colony of STATE OF QUEENSLAND” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England. 2.9: The Writ of Commission for the “Minister of The Crown, known as the Attorney General” of The UK Colony of STATE OF QUEENSLAND” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England. 2.10: The Writ of Commission for the “Minister of The Crown, known as the Attorney General” of The UK Commonwealth of Australia”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London England. 2.11: The Writ of Commission for the “Senior Registrar of the Magistrates Court of The UK Colony of STATE OF QUEENSLAND”, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London 24. 2.12: All documents you personally, and individually, rely on to establish your “head of Power” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filed in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London 2.13: All documents you personally, and individually rely on to establish “your claimed Authority” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filed in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London 2.14: All documents you personally, and individually rely on to establish your claimed “Jurisdiction” under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London 2.15: A clear printed text of the oath sworn by any Judicial officer who hears and or proposes to hear any matter in relation to the Complainants’ matter. 2.16: A current, legally binding, valid and legitimate Constitution; written and approved BY ALL the individual Independent Sovereign People of the independent entity Member State of the United Nations, Internationally recognized as “The Commonwealth of Australia”: expressing their freely given will of SELF- DETERMINATION under a Referendum (Plebiscite) conducted with the Authorised blessing of the International Community and International law; stating the source of that AUTHORITY, the date of APPROVAL and REGISTRATION with The Secretariat of The United Nations which shows acquiescence by the Australian people to any Domestic British legislation.”. 2.17: A current, legally binding, valid and legitimate Constitution; written and approved BY ALL the individual Independent Sovereign People in the STATE of QUEENSLAND evidencing their freely expressed will of SELF- DETERMINATION to be subject to ANY “government”, “law”, “court”, “judge”, “magistrate”, “justice of the peace”, “police officer”, “prison officer”, “officer of the court”, “clerk of the court”, agents”, or ANY other thing or person which is subaltern to the Parliament of the United Kingdom, proven by a Referendum (Plebiscite) conducted with the AUTHORISED blessing of the International Community and International law; stating the source of that AUTHORITY, the date of APPROVAL and REGISTRATION with The Secretariat of The United Nations. 25. 2.18: The Document whereby ALL the Individual Independent Sovereign People of the Commonwealth of Australia requested Queen Elizabeth the second, on the Throne, (re-established by ALL Sessions I & II William and Mary 1688), in The High Court of The Regent’s Parliament of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, to represent them as their Sovereign. 2.19: Either: 2.19.1: A current legal and binding Treaty, dated BEFORE the 10th of January 1920, between the Aboriginal Nations and Peoples of Australia and the Parliament of the United Kingdom of England and Ireland, under the Royal Sign Manual and Royal Signet, sealed with the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, recorded and filled in the office of Chancery of the Lord High Chancellor, in the High Court of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Dominions thereto belonging, located at Westminster, London, which Treaty evidences the acquiescence to British Colonial or other Law by the Independent, Sovereign, Indigenous Nations and Peoples of Australia, or, 2.19.2: A current legal and binding Treaty, dated AFTER the 10th of January 1920, between the Aboriginal Nations and Peoples of Australia and the Colonial Government of Australia and or the Governments of the States of the Commonwealth of Australia, which Treaty evidences the acquiescence to Australian Statutory law and or British Colonial and or other law by the Independent, Sovereign, Indigenous Nations and Peoples of Australia. 3: Should the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” not be able to produce all the above required and purportedly existent and purportedly “available” EVIDENCE OF THE PURPORTED AUTHORITY of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” and or the court or courts it is proposed will hear these matters, to the Complainants’ COMPLETE SATISFACTION by the Friday 15th August 2008, the Complainant demands that the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND” provide Certified Documentation evidencing: 3.1: Written permission from the United Nations to use Foreign Law, including British Domestic Law, in contravention of Article 2: paragraphs 1 and 4 of the United Nations Charter of 1945; 3.2: Written permission from the League of Nations to use Foreign Law in the Commonwealth of Australia in direct contravention of Articles I, X and XX of the League of Nations Covenant of 1919. 3.3: Permissions, in writing, from The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Parliament to continue to use United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Law in the Independent Sovereign Nation State of The Commonwealth of Australia, Assented to, and Duly Signed and Sealed, under The Great Seal of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, by King George the Fifth, and Counter-Signed by The Lord High Chancellor of The High Court of Parliament of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland; and 26. 3.3.1: including an Authentic, Certified Copy of Documentation evidencing the Registration of same by The Office of the Clerk of The Crown in Chancery of The High Court of The Parliament of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland at Westminster, prior to January 10, 1920. 4: Clear written evidence of the freely expressed permission by ALL the Individual Independent Sovereign People of The Commonwealth of Australia, for the continued use of Foreign Colonial Law, within: 4.1: The Commonwealth of Australia, and, 4.2: the State of QUEENSLAND, and, 4.3: within the Boundary of the land area within the continent of Australia, after January 10, 1920; (when clearly ALL FOREIGN LAW (Colonial, Imperial or otherwise) was deemed to be ABROGATED and ultravirus with respect of Australia at International Law under the TERMS AND CONDITIONS of Membership to the League of Nations, under The Covenant of The League of Nations Covenant 1919, Upon the several Independent Nations Entity States signing The Covenant at the Peace Conference at Versailles. 4.3.1: Both The Commonwealth of Australia and The United Kingdom of Great Britain and) Ireland were ORIGINAL Independent Signatory Nation Member States. 5: Clear written Certified evidence of Full General Assembly of The United Nations’ Revocation of its Resolution 2625 (XXV) of October 24, 1970 Declaring ALL British Acts (both Colonial and Imperial) as legal and binding on the Individual, Independent Sovereign people of Australia. 6: Evidence that; 6.1: All Constitutions (including Australian 1900 UK & WA, SA, Vic, Tas, NSW and Queensland). 6.2: The Statute of Westminster 1931, 6.3: Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942, and, 6.4: The Australian Acts (UK and CTA), are not NULL AND VOID in respect of the Commonwealth of Australia.. 7: Full written Certified evidence of WHY the British Colony of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of England and Ireland, assented by the Regent on the Throne in the High Court of THAT Parliament at Westminster, being a FOREIGN ACT OF A FOREIGN NATION, IS NOT registered at the United Nations in Geneva nor New York, as a RECIPROCAL MUTUAL TREATY which is required under International Law before it (as a Foreign Law) can be exercised within the land of the Commonwealth of Australia. 27. 8: That the any other “court” other than the purported High Court of Australia, so as to facilitate this matter being determined by the only purported “Australian” court which is purportedly authorised to hear challenges to the purported “Australian Constitution” and or defences taken pursuant to International Treaties, pursuant to Section 80 of the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK” , set this matter aside for hearing by the purported High Court of Australia, which, pursuant to the particulars of this NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION, is the ONLY purported “court” in Australia which might purportedly possibly have the purported authority to hear this matter under “Australia’s” purported “Constitution” (ie: the “Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 UK”). 9: That the STATE OF QUEENSLAND/NATION STATE AUSTRALIA/ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, its’ agents, assigns, officers and representatives accept, acknowledge and comply with the Complainants rights as a Sovereign on Gondwanna Land (Australia). 10: That the STATE OF QUEENSLAND, its’ agents, assigns, officers and representatives accept, acknowledge and comply with the Complainant and do not interfere with the rights of the Complainant to exercise His Sovereign rights within and upon His Sovereign land, Minjerrabah, within and upon Gondwanna Land (Australia) Pursuant to the above FACTS and DEMANDS: TAKE NOTICE that if you fail to produce the required documented evidence of the purported authority of the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/NATION STATE AUSTRALIA/ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH by the ___________________________________2008, and or fail to comply with the aforesaid Demands OR demonstrate a proper DEFENCE against ALL the FACTS upon which this NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION is founded, then it shall be taken that the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/NATION STATE AUSTRALIA/ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ADMITS: 1: THAT the facts as stated in this NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION are true and correct AND, 28. 2: THAT the demands arising from those facts are proper and reasonable AND, 3: THAT the Demands of this NOTICE OF WANT OF JURISDICTION must be complied with AND, 4: THAT the Complainant is entitled to costs and damages for any breach of the Complainant’s rights as stated herein as afforded by the Schedule of Fees forwarded to the Office of the Premier of the STATE OF QUEENSLAND, AND, 5: THAT any public or private harassment and intimidation of the Complainant and his family and community by officers the “STATE OF QUEENSLAND”/NATION STATE AUSTRALIA its’ agents, assigns, officers and or representatives under direction of the Queen of the Parliament of the Untied Kingdom of England and Ireland in her illegal purported capacity of the “Queen of Australia” are remedial by way of an action determinable by the Elders’ Council of the Complainants Nation. 6: THAT it understands, and accepts that actions against those officers referred to in paragraph 5 (immediately above) would be taken against those officers, personally. 7: THAT it has no authority at law to use any law which has its’ head of authority in either the; 7.1: Parliament of the Untied Kingdom, And/ or, 7.2: the Monarch of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, and /or, 7.3: Parliaments of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA or any state and or territory thereof, and /or, 7.4: the Queen of the Parliament of the United Kingdom in her purported and illegal capacity as the “queen of Australia”. ……………………………….. Dennis Bruce Walker Signed before me this ……. Day of ………………………….2008 At ………………………………………. ………, ……………………………….. (JP./Notary)
Posted on: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 20:24:20 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015