A REPUBLICAN IS NO BETTER THAN A DEMOCRAT: NEITHER HAVE A GOAL AS - TopicsExpress



          

A REPUBLICAN IS NO BETTER THAN A DEMOCRAT: NEITHER HAVE A GOAL AS IT RELATES TO EITHER FACTS, OR EVEN THE TRUTH: I am going to go out on a limb, with the goal of attempting to reach anyone who may read my words in an effort to ask that all existing biases be set aside, if only for the duration of time required to read those words, and to not to seek evaluation or analysis of those words until those words in their entirety have been absorbed. If I am met with automatic resistance, it will be based primarily on what I will describe below. My words should not be interpreted as being biased in a political manner, and my words, past and present should not allow that to be the basis for any analysis of evaluation of my words. With what we face, as individual families, isolated groups, chosen political affiliations, with the acceptance or denial of spiritual beliefs, and as a collective society, there are common components with each that will not allow an understanding of any of the entities that I have listed. Pre-determined acceptance or denial, beliefs or refusal to believe, trusts or refusal of trust, loyalty to government or individuals within our government based upon either known or unknown factors, and especially choices made that are dependence upon others as opposed to individual thoughts, evaluations, or analysis seem to be driven by suggested societal guidelines instead of the foundation of truth in all that concerns each of the issues or those who are behind those issues. It seems that within our government, the very dynamics require a division that separates our American society into two separate groups, left and right, as created and maintained by that same government, and that division will not allow the possibility of unity with the people of this nation to ever become a reality. That division does not exists within Washington as it does with common American society, and that understanding is imperative if one wishes to understand the truth. You cannot have a true understanding of anything if you do not absolutely demand total truth. When I speak in representation of either the Republicans or the Democrats, it should not be interpreted as speaking of either as a collective body, as if there is no possibility that some within either group are incapable of independent thought that would take them away from the suggested paths of either of the groups. We are not all the same, and we do not all think in the same manner, as if one group is correct on any issue, simply based upon our chosen political affiliation to that particular political party. When choices are made, evaluations are concluded, or a path is chosen based simply upon political party affiliation, the facts or even the truth becomes secondary and deemed totally irrelevant and is not the basis for those choices, evaluations, or paths that surface. When facts and the truth are not the primary determining evaluation points with anything, how does one actually anticipate any results that are not tarnished with the absence of demanding facts and truth? Without actual facts or anything less than the truth, the end result of anything is going to represent something that is simply unworthy of actual acceptance, unless your goal is to hinder those facts or that truth from being known. To be willing to not demand facts and truth to be the true components of any evaluation or analysis is representative of three types of personalities. (1) Those who are mentally unable to distinguish between right and wrong or true and false. (2) Those who are lazy or weak, and are willing to allow others to think and act on their behalf, and trust that the outcome will be in line with what will benefit them as individuals. (3) Those who wish to not allow the facts or the truth to be known for the purpose of personal benefit at the expense of the two other personalities that I listed. The true problem with this nation, and even the world is not just those elite few who are willing to stomp on all who will not adhere to their completely mapped out agenda, but with the collective society that will not take a stand against them. To not stand up against false facts and the projection of constant untruths is no different than to interpret that evil as being acceptable to our society. In order to win the individual battles against the individual issues and goals, you must have an understanding that there must be a foundation that demands both facts and truth, even if it means taking a stand against those who are in positions of authority. If those who are currently in charge are against facts and truth, then they are against you, and it does not matter if you are a Republican or a Democrat. Facts and truth are not different based upon your chosen political party affiliation, and until we realize that, as a society, we will never experience facts and truth as the driving force for all that dictates the direction of our nation, or even the world. Vic Damico 2013
Posted on: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 01:34:26 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015