A landmark ruling this one. Even if URA gets paid less or even fails to find Zain in Uganda, at least we have a precedent. #TaxJustice. “Accordingly, with respect to the trial judge, we find that he was not right to hold that the appellant [URA] had no jurisdiction to assess and tax the appellant [Zain],” the court ruled. “It is our decision that the appellant was and is possessed of such jurisdiction. It was up to the respondent to discharge the burden that he was not liable to pay because of some exemption or some other valid reason.”
Posted on: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:59:15 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015