A snake or a scorpion can kill one person. The Democrats have - TopicsExpress

A snake or a scorpion can kill one person. The Democrats have almost killed a once-free nation based on their failed policy of irrational compassion. Ron Ewart Now what the Democrats have done to America for the last 100 years of the Progressive movement has been endlessly written about in article after article, essay after essay and book after book. What could we possibly add to the dialogue that would provide any more enlightenment to the issue? After all, it is merely a question of a difference in ideals and philosophy of how to govern, isnt it? No! It is more than that. It is a question of power and who in a diverse society will govern that society. In a representative democratic society, who is in power is determined by the number of votes a particular faction (party) can garner at each election cycle. Over the last 100 years the Democrats have been very successful in garnering the number of votes necessary to remain in power for long periods of time. But how have they done that? They have focused their attention on those less fortunate among us. They have focused their attention on the poor, the downtrodden, the indigent, the uneducated, the minorities, the illegal aliens, the free loaders, the disabled, women and the mentally ill because these groups represent the lions share of the votes. The method of their focus was to promote each of these groups as victims, which gave the victim (according to the Progressives) the absolute right to a piece of the public treasury that the Democrats promised they would deliver if elected. This has been the simple winning strategy of the Democrats to remain in power for most of the last 100 years. It is a brilliant strategy that is of course if you can ignore the fact that they have violated the constitution to promote that strategy for most of those 100 years. The list of those violations goes on and on and is still going on. Now it can be argued that what the Democrats/liberals/Progressives are doing is noble and they base their philosophical arguments and their whole reason for existence on that premise. After all, who will stand for those less fortunate if the Democrats dont? The fallacy of this allegedly noble cause is, who gets to pay for it all? In a very rich country, paying for it shouldnt be a problem ….. or should it?