ADVERTISEMENT eEdition Stay Connected Customer Service Advertise Shopping Cars Jobs Homes Classifieds The Detroit News Opinions + Editorial Editorials News Sports Business+Autos Entertainment+Lifestyle Opinion Multimedia Home Opinion Editorials July 22, 2014 at 1:00 am VOTING RIGHTS AND WRONGS Vote fraud myths meet voting rights reality Clarence Page 18 Comments Before she was allowed to register and vote for the first time in Franklin County, N.C., Rosanell Eaton had to read the entire preamble to the U.S. Constitution out loud in front of three men in the county courthouse. Eaton is black. The three men testing her were white. The time was the early 1940s, when trying to vote was difficult and even dangerous for African-Americans. Contrived “literacy tests” were one of the milder obstacles that were deployed to suppress the black vote in the South. Now 93, Eaton is back in court. This summer she is the lead plaintiff in one of two lawsuits brought by the North Carolina NAACP and others to prevent her state from raising a batch of new hurdles to voting in this November’s midterm elections. That lawsuit is one of two filed this month against a package of voter inconveniences signed into law by North Carolina’s Republican Gov. Pat McCrory. The new law includes cutbacks in early voting, new limits on voter registration, less poll worker assistance to voters and new voting requirements such as photo identification. Eaton fears she could run afoul of a new state requirement beginning in 2016 to show a photo ID at the polling station. The name on her driver’s license does not match that on her voter registration card. That’s not an unusual problem but, like the old literacy tests, the new rules weigh statistically and suspiciously to the disadvantage of people like her — non-whites, low-income and the elderly, among others. Similar impediments to minority voting have been enacted or debated in more than 30 other states in a mostly Republican-led drive that picked up steam after President Barack Obama’s first election. “What’s so racist about asking for photo ID?” proponents of photo IDs reasonably ask. Not much, except when such requirements are biased, burdensome, ineffective, deceptive and elitist. If Republicans really want to catch and stop election fraud, they’re barking up the wrong polling place, various independent studies show. Instead of focusing on voter impersonation at polling places, they should be looking at absentee ballots. That was the advice given, for example, by the bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform that convened after Florida’s presidential election debacle in 2000. “Absentee ballots,” said their 2005 report, “remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” Nevertheless, the new wave of Republican pursuers of vote fraud seldom mentions absentee ballots. Maybe that’s because absentee ballots tend to be used more often by Republicans than Democrats. And it’s also fair to say that the negative impact of photo ID requirements may be exaggerated, too. As Politifact reports, a 2013 report by the Census Bureau confirmed that the African-American voting rate in 2012 (66.2 percent) surpassed the white voting rate (64.1 percent), even in states that had the toughest photo-ID requirements. Of course, it didn’t hurt that President Barack Obama was on the ballot. Besides, much of the black turnout may have been spurred by backlash against widespread reports of Republican voter-suppression efforts. Some problems ironically solve themselves, but eternal vigilance is still price of voting rights. Justice Department lawsuits this summer and fall in Texas and North Carolina mark the first tests of voting rights since the Supreme Court’s Shelby v. Holder decision last year gutted key provisions of the 1965 law. Those provisions required “preclearance” by the Justice Department before any changes could be made to election procedures in states that have long histories of racial discrimination. Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion discarded those provisions as “based on 40-year-old facts having no logical relationship to the present day.” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in her dissent, compared that reasoning to “throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.” Justice Department lawyers can now present witnesses like Rosanell Eaton to say whether the “40-year-old facts” are still relevant today. I wish they weren’t, but in many ways they still are. Clarence Page writes for the Chicago Tribune. Print A A More Clarence Page Dove Obama makes for a reluctant hawk When sportsmen behave badly — again After Fergusons fires, go and vote next time President Obamas bully pulpit Join the Conversation The Detroit News aims to provide a forum that fosters smart, civil discussions on the news and events that we cover. The News will not condone personal attacks, off topic posts or brutish language on our site. If you find a comment that you believe violates these standards, please click the X in the upper right corner of the post to report it. Policies Community Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service More From Editorials Wed, Sep 17 Worst tax code behind corporate flight Its not corporate greed or a lack of patriotism that is driving American corporations overseas, as President Barack Obama contends. Its one of the worst corporate tax codes in the developed world. Wed, Sep 17 Do corporations have Constitutional rights? Wed, Sep 17 In praise of our supreme law Wed, Sep 17 Scotland is in no position to seek independence Wed, Sep 17 Beware China organ harvesting Wed, Sep 17 Unions lead the way on equality in Michigan Tue, Sep 16 Detroit cops must retake the streets . ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT [CareerBuilder Logo] FEATURED JOBS THIS WEEK LOCAL AND REGIONAL DRIVERS Permier Transportation Detroit, MI Skilled Maintenance Tech & Eng Detroit , MI Engineers Altair Product Design Troy, MI Experienced Gravel Train Drivers Detroit , MI Previous Next in partnership with: [CareerBuilder Logo] Recruiters, showcase your positions here. More from The Detroit News Seen in the Photo Store Detroit News PhotoStore Purchase Detroit News images of historic events, scenes, places and people. Go to the PhotoStore Subscribe Sign up for home delivery today Follow Us On Twitter Tweets by @detroitnews The Detroit News Apps Stay up to date on the go with the latest from The Detroit News apps Our apps connect you with the best news, sports, auto and entertainment coverage from our team of award-winning journalists. For iPhone and iPod Touch For Android Archives Yesterday, Sep. 17 Tuesday, Sep. 16 Monday, Sep. 15 Sunday, Sep. 14 Saturday, Sep. 13 Friday, Sep. 12 Thursday, Sep. 11 See our paid archives for news older than a week. ADVERTISEMENT The Detroit News News Sports Business Autos Entertainment Lifestyle Opinion Photos Video Shopping Rentals Homes Jobs Cars 615 W. Lafayette Blvd. Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 222-2300 MMS_tag The Detroit News Directory + Contacts Jobs at The Detroit Media Partnership Terms of Service Privacy Notice Ad Choices Site Index Newspapers In Education Subscriber Services Newspaper Subscriptions Manage Account Report a Delivery Issue eEdition Newsletters Mobile RSS Advertise Web + Mobile Newspaper Classifieds Death Notices Store Photographs Connect Contact The Detroit News Contact The Detroit Media Partnership Facebook Twitter Google+ © 2014 The Detroit News. All rights reserved. A MediaNews Group Paper Part of Detroit Media Solutions Subscriptions eEdition Mobile Text Alerts Newsletter RSS From The Detroit News: detroitnews/article/20140722/OPINION01/307220005#ixzz3Di8deiFO
Posted on: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:57:16 +0000