AMERIAN CANCER SOCIETY SCAM Consider the faces of the sad bald-headed children, as seen in American Cancer Society (ACS) advertisements. Now, consider the image of Thomas Jefferson on the $2 bill. You may not have seen one lately, but over $1 billion worth of $2 bills are in circulation. Picture a shiny copper-clad penny. Only 2.5 percent of our smallest denomination coin consists of copper. The rest is zinc. The present copper penny is a paper-thin-skinned illusion. So too is the ACSs pretend-caring for little bald-headed cancer victims who will soon die. They are magnificent vehicles for money raising. For each $2 bill worth of donations raised by the ACS, only one copper-clad red cent is spent on childrens cancers. In 2012 (the last year for which such data is available), ACS raised over $924 million. They also listed more than $1.2 billion in net assets. Their president, John Seffrin earns a $2.2 million annual salary. Last year, he was paid a $1.5 million bonus for all of the good work he performed continuing ACS business. Perform a Google search on American Cancer Society Scam and you will get 610,000 results. ACS is a billion dollar corporation that fools do-gooders into imagining that they make a difference. ACS was founded by doctors and is supported by doctors and rewards those doctors who perform phony BRCA testing, and then perform very expensive mutilation surgeries removing the healthy breasts of those women who reLIE upon the lies of a morally corrupt medical system that runs amok by skillfully using scare tactics. Early on the morning of July 15, 2014, I found 1,541 new scientific publications on Medline. I was surprised that 154 of those scientific papers were on the subject of cancer. It is rare that a Medline study does not contain an abstract. It is even rarer that such a publication does not include author information, author affiliation, or author contact information. Two studies offered nothing but a title. The journal was Cancer, and the author of both was Carrie Printz. Unlike all of the other cancer publication authors, Printz is neither a doctor nor cancer researcher, and a subsequent Notmilk investigation revealed that she has no educational background in science or cancer research. How then, could such a biased and ignorant writer get her poorly researched published in the ACS journal with this title: Women with BRCA mutation have better survival rates after double mastectomy. I wondered, Who the heck is Carrie Printz? After looking up this journalist for hire, I sadly discovered that since May 1, 2014, non-scientist Printz has been credited with fourteen scientific publications in the journal Cancer, many of which promote protocols which make oncologists wealthy. Who is this Carrie Prince? She is the newly discovered (uncovered) Princess of the Miss-Carrie-of-Injustice. Her July 15, 2014 publication encourages women to voluntarily mutilate themselves by removing their healthy breasts after testing positive for the BRCA gene. Printz cites a February, 2014 publication in the British Medical Journal to make her point, which is in fact, and enormous distortion of truth. Consider that virtually every American woman diagnosed with breast cancer in 2014 will have some sort of chemotherapy as her treatment, while reading a conclusion of the study published in the British Medical Journal (Metcalf, et. al.) Doctors wrote: In the current study, we report that women with a BRCA1 (versus BRCA2) mutation were significantly more likely to die of their disease. However, the survival difference was not significant in the subgroup of cases that were treated with chemotherapy. This result is consistent with the conclusion of another study, which reported that carriers of the BRCA1 mutation had a worse prognosis than did carriers of the BRCA2 mutation or non-carriers, but only among women who did not receive chemotherapy. Virtually all have chemotherapy. Ah, the distortion. * * * * The most dangerous of all falsehoods is a slightly distorted truth. ― Georg Christoph Lichtenberg
Posted on: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 03:44:56 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015