An Afrikan is defined as a native of Afrika,a member of the race or a negro as the European or American puts it,so it is contradictory to say white Afrikan.there is no such thing as a White,Indian or Chinese Afrikan.during European conquest of Afrika,when looking for slaves they never looked for whites Afrikan slaves but for Afrikans in which they were black.so the name Afrikan has always identified with the native/black people of Afrika.a white settler in Afrika remains a white settler,same with those Arabs,Chinese and Indians. They have their European Union,Arab League which clearly states that for one to be a member,a country should be of European or Arab origin led by whites.but in Afrika with our Afrikan Union,an Afrikan is never identified therefore we find ourselves in a mist of nations such as Algeria,Tunisia,Egypt,Lybia and Mauritania who serve Arab interest within the AU.they are members of the Arab league together with Middle East countries such as Lebanon,Jordan,Palestin and Syria and yet at the same time members of the AU.we know very well they identify more with their Arab brothers more than us Afrikan,they have double standards.you cant be an Arab and an Afrikan at the same time,same as you cant chinese and Afrikan at the same time. Afrikans are black,simple and klaar.we need to have a Black league for all black nations in the world so to serve black interest and solidarity.in organizations like the AU,we find ourselves infiltrated by Arab/European agents who are said to be members of the AU. We must never sacrifice nor compromise our god given identifies for the sake of an illusional unity with other nations.an Afrikan remains black,finish and klaar.there is no such thing as a Black European,Black Arab.so why should we have White Afrikans when their fellow brothers are not accomodative with their identities. Afrika for Afrikans,Afrikans for Humanity and Humanity God and God for all of us.
Posted on: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:00:55 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015