And yet when we look back into the past at the mainstream - TopicsExpress



          

And yet when we look back into the past at the mainstream media’s coverage of Obama, it now seems a bizarre combination of girlish adulation and neurotic denial. When there were hints of Obama’s deep connections with lowlifes like shady businessman Tony Rezko and radicals like terrorist Bill Ayers, mainstream news people said, oh, that’s the sort of thing only Fox News cares about; when his administration covered up fatal malfeasance in Benghazi, despicable corruption at the IRS, and unconstitutional manipulations at the Justice Department, the MSM said oh, that’s the sort of thing only Fox News cares about; when conservatives pointed out that the major news outlets had virtually stopped doing honest journalism altogether, the outlets responded, oh, honest journalism is the sort of thing only Fox News cares about. Instead, the mainstream media kowtowed to Obama with weak sauce questions like “What enchants you most about the presidency?” and Are your political opponents “uninformed, out of touch or irresponsible?” They depicted Obama on magazine covers as George Washington, Lincoln, and FDR. They launched massive attacks on anyone who challenged him whether it was a fair target like Sarah Palin or an ordinary plumber named Joe. In the words of Barbara Walters, they thought he was [quote] “going to be the next messiah.” So Mainstream Media, how did you get it so wrong? What can you learn from the past? [pause] You’re stupid. And corrupt. That’s pretty much it. Glad I could help.
Posted on: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:53:04 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015