Appellants potential remedies are to assist in the prosecution of criminal charges; to report any allegations of dereliction. Taylor v. Bidwell. (Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal. 2d 450, 455 [20 Cal. Rptr. 321, 369 P.2d 937], NAACP v. Golding (1996) 342 Md. 663, 679 A.2d 554, Plaintiff describes manifest error concerning presiding Justice’s knowledge of employees during court functions related to hearings retrial appeal and Police report. Log files, time cards and employment status and verification is part of the commission of State Employees and are reference material and facts of incorporation part of open cases with district authorities and before the bar regarding cases and calendaring . Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 92 S. Ct. 2646, 33 L. Ed. 2d 626 [1972] Kelly v. Terminal Railroad Assn, 315 S.W. 2d 699 (Mo.1958) **For the purpose of assigning legal responsibility, philosophical and scientific notions are put aside…in favour of a common sense approach which allows that ‘breach of duty coupled with an [event] of the kind that might thereby be caused is enough to justify an inference, in the absence of any sufficient reason to the contrary, that in fact the [event] did occur owing to the act or omission amounting to the breach’ [citing Betts v Whittingslowe (1945) per Dixon J]
Posted on: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 08:04:48 +0000