BARAK OBAMA AN IDEALISTIC HYPOCRITE: November 1999, US President Bill Clinton sends US and NATO troops into Kosovo to put an immediate end to the Serbian slaughter of innocent civilians there and topple the regime of Serbian President Slobadan Milosevich. There was no Oil in Kosovo, it was a tiny landlocked nation with very few resources in Eastern Europe with nill strategic value for the US, in fact it was a strategic risk because of its proximity to Russia and its enemy, Serbia, was supported militarily and politically by Russia. So why did President Clinton take the risk against the wishes of his NATO allies to send troops into Kosovo? It was out of a sense of MORAL SENSITIVITY. After pictures and evidence of mass graves and Nazi Germany style concentration camps emerged in the world media President Clinton, being morally sensitive, knew that as the head of the most powerful country on the planet and consequently Leader of the Free World, he had a moral responsibility to act decisively and stop the bloodshed and send a message to the rest of the world that such wanton acts of savagery would not be tolerated in this day and age. Clinton succeeded in dismantling Milosevichs regime and he was concicted as a war criminal and now awaits sentencing at the Hague. Compare the above with Obamas handling of the Syrian Civil War today. The most prominent feature of Obamas handling of this crisis is his MORAL INSENSITIVITY to the indiscriminate slaughter of innocent civilians by Syrian dictator Bashar Assad
Posted on: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 02:27:12 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015