Big Bang 2: So we examined why the initial explosion cannot randomly create itself, and ignite itself in a vacuum. If you stare at nothing in a vacuum, whether it is for 5 minutes, or 13 billion years, no amount of wishful thinking will make it turn into a universe. However, for arguments sake, let us assume the initial explosion happened and examine what next: 1. No way to unite particles, they would continually get farther apart as they left the central explosion 2. Since there would be no matter, space would be frictionless, therefore there would be no way to ever slow any of the particles (3rd law) 3. Particles would maintain the same speed and vector.... forever. No way to change direction of even one particle, to make it begin circling another. 4.Law of physics and angular momentum dictate that not one particle would change direction and the formation of an atom, or cluster of atoms, or gaseous cloud would all be needed to begin. 5. Origination of atomic structures? From vectored sub-atomic particles into complex atoms, (even hydrogen is complex at the sub atomic level) So what we have, all told here, is the violation of the first three laws of thermodynamics right off the bat, along with contradictions to known physics principles, such as the law of conservation of angular momentum. And from these particles, the theory is....gradually outward racing particles are said to have begun circling one another. These formed atoms, and changed directions further still, towards one another, to create gas clouds which then produced the first star or stars. There are many quotes by evolutionists taking it evolution from the realm of biology to other sciences, and has been used and applied to psychology, geology, etc.... as well as astronomy, and in this case stellar evolution.
Posted on: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:42:29 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015