Boeing 737 or DC-9 aircraft at one nautical mile (6080 ft) before landing (97 dB) But the plane that hit the Pentagon was neither that high (it was estimated at final moments, to have been not more than 6 feet off the grass) nor was it slow, in fact it is believed to have impacted at over 500mph (An issue debated by qualified pilots as to whether it could be possible given air density, and to achieve that speed would necessitate operating above its capacity) whether or not it could achieve that speed is irrelevant, average landing speeds are variable but a good margin is 130-160 mph. the noise heard at that speed is demonstrable in the video below, which of itself is not enough since that is just a video. To get a real idea, go to where 757s land regularly and listen for the noise if you can get close enough. Speak to people who have planes fly over, experience just the decibel volume of 97Db Now go read the witness statements below. 911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/witnesses/bart.html Few really speak of the noise and there are few witnesses anyway, but when one considers even the Naudet footage, why did it capture the impact of AA11? Because at over 1000 ft high, the plane was heard at street level, people looked upwards. So, visually, at the Pentagon that has circa 20,000 workers, and busy roads close by, a 757 should have been seen by many hundreds of people, audibly.....the same. But there is a lack of numbers, and especially in terms of hearing the plane. Some witnesses less press given to those of course, have made claims that detail the appearance as closer to that of Global Hawks, which circa 9/11, 2 were missing but accounted for simply as, in ongoing operations. That is all. Additionally, the collapse of the Pentagon roof was not due to the impact, it collapsed almost an hour after impact. In fact had the tail of a 757 hit the Pentagon roof, as it surely must, it would leave a mark at the least, it did not. But no let us not question the official story. A quiet plane at 500+mph hides itself and skims just 6 feet above the ground, clipping light poles with negligible effects to the plane, it soundlessly moves across the lawn to impact and glide into a space smaller than itself. It leaves no large pieces and not even the over 6 foot engines. But whilst the majority of the plane is vaporized, dna which is destroyed at lower temperatures, that is fine and remains. Additionally our hijacker whose instructor described him as incompetent and unable to fly, performs a manoeuvre many pro pilots say they could not do, rather than diving onto the Pentagon it performs a complicated loop at speed (very quietly) Then by chance hits the part of the Pentagon which due to renovations, was empty but also, conveniently contained vital information pertaining to the missing 2.3 TRILLION dollars of unaccounted spending. Some debunkers claim since Rumsfeld admitted the money couldnt be tracked it was there but needing finding and why admit when he could have simply (if in on it) had all evidence wiped out. That is self explanatory, the best lies contain truth, and HAS it been accounted for? Why wouldnt he admit it, certainly if it came out AFTER by some means, then it would look like the biggest pointing finger in existence, pre admission allows an alibi exactly of..why make admissions before? But lets just say, it was convenient that a plane is quieter at speed and low levels than at height and slow speeds (on that day and no other in history) Lets just say, how convenient an unskilled pilot could pull off a great manoeuvre just once. Lets say convenient that he didnt dive bomb aiming for the centre which had he, it could have been the deaths of 1000s just at the Pentagon. Let the lack of roof damage be luck and coincidence, even though at the Twin towers, the tail fins of those planes, punched through solid steel and aluminium to leave clear cartoon like outlines, the Pentagon? Not so much. All coincidences and luck or really a reason to look a little deeper.
Posted on: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:34:26 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015