By definition we must move to renewable energy, how can one argue against that? because to argue for it is to say we will eventually run out of energy and die, or civilization will collapse, so obviously we must find ways to produce energy in a renewable manner, the question is just how hard we should try what pace should we go at. And i think logically we should go as fast as we can, because since we know we have to get there eventually, it is better to get to a renewable future a sustainable future sooner rather than later, get there before we do the environmental damage not after, even if one can say maybe there isnt that much environmental damage, to play the devils advocate - maybe the environmental damage wont be that bad - Why take the chance? https://youtube/watch?v=HiOLan8J0cE
Posted on: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:52:01 +0000