C) Robert Trentacosta, verbatim: a. I told Mr. Bonas I was going to give him one last chance. b. I asked Mr. Bonas very, very specifically to show me that he could restrain himself from writing …. 12-20-05 Sentencing Hearing, at page 48, lines 24-25. 12-20-05 Sentencing Hearing, at page 48, lines 26-27. 1) If any one ensnare another, by putting a ban upon him, but he can not prove it, then he that ensnared him shall be put to death. Nations Law, Hammarubis Code. CJ Was Executed for Crimes Against The Republic’s-Empire According to the Gospels, Jesus had no particular quarrel with Rome and did not violate Roman law. Yet he was punished by the Romans in accordance with Roman law, and executed by a means exclusively reserved for those guilty of crimes against the empire. There is a reason for the latter: Cruel and unusual public punishment, calculated to derive the maximum amount of suffering. As such, the Roman practice adhered to a very precise procedure – first, a flogging to weaken one by loss of blood. Then outstretched arms fashioned by throngs or nails to a heavy wooden beam, which the victim carried across his neck and shoulders to the place of execution. A function of free internet speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger.” “Speech is often provocative and challenging. It may strike at prejudices and preconceptions and have profound unsettling effects as it presses for acceptance of an idea.” “That is why freedom of speech . . . is . . . protected against censorship or punishment, unless shown likely to produce a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest. . . .” “There is no room under our Constitution for a more restrictive view. For the alternative would lead to standardization of ideas either by legislatures, courts, or dominant political or community [Chief of Police] groups. Solon: What the judge does is to restore equality.” Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 237-238 (1963). Aristotle, Ethics Do It Yourself Back Door Judgers 05-17-05 05-17-05 Hearing Transcript removed from the record, by Evan Kirvin and Trentacosts, in concert, after a back door call, meet and confirm and solicitation to commit a tampering with a formal record evidence. Yep - they did it a lot in this Bonas case: Bonnie Dumanis, Esq. Phyllis Shess, Esq. Carol A. Buck, Esq. Ofc District Attorney 330 W Broadway #750 San Diego, California 92101 Re: Firms-County State et al. v. Bonas, Case No. SCD159416 (San Diego Sup. Ct.) The People’s “Counsel”, County Prosecutors, I write to request some missing files in the above referenced matter. The United States Court, Central District of California, ordered Bonas to “Produce … a certified copy of the entire record from the other jurisdiction ….” The “other jurisdiction” is the same land, but a different lane of law the County D.A. does business under. Bonas was provided a certified copy of part of the record in this case - from his appellate counsel, Dan Koryn. That certified copy, however, is materially incomplete, rendering it impossible for Bonas to comply with the Central District’s order. For example, after perusing the record, the following documents were omitted or otherwise removed from the certified file: ● 04-10-01 - “verified complaint” Wayne Peterson by Paul Pfingst (attached); ● 09-13-04 – (held on or about) hearing transcript (proof of which is attached); ● 08-16-04 - transcript of tape recording filed by Remke (State Bar) on 09-13-04 ish; ● 05-17-05 - Evidence Hearing, Dan Mogin et al. Hearing Transcript (proof attached); and ● 05-31-05 – The State’s Dr. Philip Hanger report, e.g. (proof of attached) Bonas has made many requests for these documents, all of which have been evaded. See attached. To remind, “The unathorized removal of records - violation of §§ 6200 AND 6201 (California’s Gov. Code) subjects violators to imprisonment, fine, or both. Rule 2.550(a) reads that unless confidential or sealed by law, all court records are presumed open. Last, U.S. Attorney Cheng informed Bonas that you arranged for it to withhold/convert his property (computers, papers …) after its twin case was dismissed with prejudice. See attached 01-30-04 U.S. Attorney letter. Please kindly arrange to return it all? (4th and 5th Amen). Kind regards, Cash Joseph Bonas 08-05-05 OSC, Federal Justice Marshall to Bonas, at pages 1-2. To remind, “The unauthorized removal of records - violation of §§ 6200 AND 6201 (California’s Gov. Code) subjects violators to imprisonment, fine, or both. Rule 2.550(a) reads that unless confidential or sealed by law, all court records are presumed open. https://youtube/watch?v=UjbRnmJrWIQ
Posted on: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:25:08 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015