Carlsons premise is that the central story of Wendy Daviss ascent is true and that a false detail here or there does not negate that. Get a detail wrong about whether you divorced at 21 or at 19, she complains, and woe unto you. Carlson goes on to accuse Daviss political enemies of unfairly turning the story of the courageous, articulate and inspiring lawyer into the tale of a fabulist who cant be trusted. If Id misstated a fact like that, my security clearance/ military career/ government service would have been curtailed very early, possibly involving Prison Time. I think Ms Davis deserves no less...
Posted on: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:18:56 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015