Cash Joseph Bonas 25852 McBean Parkway #748 Santa Clarita, California 91355 December 02, 2007 Phyllis Shess, Esq. Carol A. Buck, Esq. Ofc District Attorney 330 W Broadway #750 San Diego, California 92101 Re: Double “O.R.” Bail – U.S. Attorney - DA Crimes 101 County Defectors, In context of prior certified details, this paper fills in some material gaps about your active back to back (federal state) criminal-criminal persecutions against Bonas, for the record. I. Backround - $300 Million Motives – Take Bonas Out In concert, you (Los Angeles U.S. Attorneys and San Diego District Attorneys) took Bonas prisoner on April 04, 2001, right in the middle of a $300 million dollar case - during pending post trial litigation. Bonas’ brief was due to be filed on or about April 09, 2001. His brief(s) detailed simple facts and rules confirming a per se criminal price fixing ring, criminal kick back laundering and many other open and shut price economic crimes. His brief(s) showed basic testimony and rules your firm clients “agreed” not to represent or otherwise disclose; this reality ignites another series of dark economic price lit crimes routinely entered by social deviants (like your client firms). That will be more fully detailed later. Your double prosecution teams entered a contract to represent price economic firms in the midst of price economic litigation warfare against Wall Street’s retail chains. The reality here is you and your clients took Bonas out of the lit equation to insure he could not represent over 14 million federal citizen clients - and the Federal Government’s gigantic W.I.C. money interests, countrywide. Like their words to you and others, your client’s papers are riddled with basic material omissions; their own papers confirm this inconvenient truth. a. 10-01-99 – Bonas Pelican Brief Attached as Exhibit A is Bonas 10-01-99 direct proof supported briefing, which is 20 pages in length. This briefing Bonas wrote and filed alone, after an enormous internal rift over the crookedly tilted 09-08-99 papers Howarth & Smith wrote (Exhibit B) and filed without client approval and without Bonas’ knowledge or consent. Howarth & Smith’s papers are the product of a criminal backdoor agreement to conceal the “direct proof” information Bonas briefed. Bonas 10-01-99 brief set in motion a large problem for the multi-billion dollar chains and firms representing them. It set in motion an enormous problem of competence, ethics, candor, perjury and misrepresentation for the firms involved in the pending Los Angeles Milk case (Barella et al. v. Ralphs et al.), which they settled for coupons and attorneys fees. This brief set the stage for the twin milk case your clients arranged to have filed in Chicago Illinois. You may recall from your own files, this Chicago crew contacted Bonas, not Howarth & Smith, not any firm in the Los Angeles Milk case (Dan Mogin, Francis “Alioto” Scarpulla, Marc Seltzer – Susman Godfrey, Latham and Watkins, Sherman and Sterling, Morgan Lewis and Bockius, e.g.) and offered him a paying job to provide information for that litigation. II. Compare and Contrast A qualified comparison of the price economic litigation papers Bonas authored versus the price economic litigation papers Howarth & Smith (like all other class firm players) directly spots the scripted, clandestine arrangements that illegally govern price economic combat. The arrangements made in enormous money cases like Eggs were designed during World War II by the Department of Economic Warfare. Thereafter, the scripts were imported into the private sector and applied for big money - by the Sicilian family de Corleone, Joseph L. Alioto et al.. A short Alioto bio explains: Alioto, Joseph Lawrence (1916-1998) was a key economic reverse engineering member of the anti-trust division in the Justice Department (1940-45). After graduating in 1940, he became an antitrust lawyer for the Government and then, when the United States entered World War II, he went to the Board of Economic Warfare, where he studied German, Italian and Japanese cartels. From 1964 to 1966, he won more than $61 million in damages, mostly for clients challenging big companies in price-fixing cases. The fees made him wealthy and he invested in businesses through his company, Alioto Enterprises. Until Mr. Alioto came along, antitrust cases generally were brought by Government agencies. We established the nations laws … monopolistic practices, Mr. Alioto told The San Francisco Examiner. The economic lit scripts are designed to entirely conceal simple systems, which are cartel systems by definition. The scripts are a function of smoke and mirrors and circular logic. The cover name is “oligopoly parallel pricing,” a silly shift from “direct” to “circumstantial” proof – to dodge system facts. The fact of its existence is handled by many laws, including: U.S.C. §2382 Misprision of treason U.S.C. § 2383 U.S.C. §2384 Rebellion or insurrection Seditious conspiracy U.S.C. §2387 Affecting armed forces generally Since 1994 Bonas has had first hand experience with this Sicilian Alioto Family’s big money lit business. See Exhibit C (Bonas 02-28-96 “Catfish case work letters - Don Howarth and the Alioto family esquires). Bonas first met and began working with Francis “Alioto” Scarpulla, Mario Alioto and Guido Saveri in 1994. III. The Firms’ Maleficium – Oligopoly Parallel Pricing The single common denominator in the firms’ “take out Bonas” campaign is seeded in their common adherence to the Alioto “oligopoly parallel pricing” fiction. That dark, big money fiction began this problem long ago. Bonas whistle-blowing on it triggered an identified chain reaction of synergistic government corruption – to silence and “take him out.” After 2 and ½ years held prisoner, on 10-06-03, the San Diego (SD) Bench wrote: “If there is a current recommendation from a doctor as to [him] … not being a [business] danger to the [ESQ] public, the Court will reconsider O.R. release.” Relying on the Bench’s words, two confidential reports were secured from the following PHDs: On 12-14-03, PH.D Kathernine D’Franchesca on Bonas, verbatim: [I]t is my opinion that he is not a danger to anyone at this time, is able and willing to follow the orders of the court and is safe to be released into the community. [He] has the social and emotional support of his family. On 11-24-03, PHD/JDAlan Abrams on Bonas, verbatim: His … psychosis is presently in full remission. I was unable to find any overt symptoms of [any] … disorder on my examination. His fund of knowledge was excellent. He talked with pride about his … abilities as a researcher. When pushed about … price fixing, … [he] remained fully rational and logical. His vocabulary and grasp of complex concepts indicates superior intelligence. He was able to do serial subtractions by 7 accurately and quickly. His insight is good. At present, [he] … poses no increased risk of dangerous [speech] behavior if he is released into the community …. ● Rule out Schizoaffective Disorder …. ● Rule out Delusional Disorder …. ● History of–use, in full remission …. On 12-30-03, at the reconsideration of O.R. release hearing, the Bench never even considered O.R. release so that he could prepare for trial. After back door forbidden communications, the bench cut a deal on behalf of Lerach, Robert Brewer and Noonan; it criminally transformed a bail hearing into its own judge, jury and execution hearing, saying: ● “If you plea guilty I will release you on your own recognizance tomorrow.” ● “The District Attorney’s office is not taking part in this negotiation.” The S.D. appellate court dodged this conclusive issue, breaching its duty, again: This is not a Harry Potter novel; there is no charm for making … constitutional rights disappear. Thank you for your courtesy and independent review of this information. Kind regards, Cash Joseph Bonas List of Public Actors Who Chose To Do Bonas Lewis & Clark College Barbara Masterson ’85 has been an assistant U.S. attorney in Los Angeles since 1994 and specializes in criminal prosecution. She married Keith Saunders in 1997 and had a baby boy in 2000. John Ashcroft Ronald Cheng John Gordon Debra W. Yang Jacqueline Chooljian Andrea L. Russi Certified background contained in your own P.O. files confirms that in addition to California firms and Wall Street’s retail chain interests, you willfully chose to again represent Chicago Illinois’ retail chain and firm interests in the Bonas matter. You did so by reusing Chicago’s Rock Fusco and Garvey (Andrew Hale) false Bonas statements that directly link to the Chicago Milk price fixing case (Albertsons is the parent Corporation of Jewel), backing Latham and Watkins, as you know. Cierras Family History Now, we take a small trip over to my Sicilian side of the family. His name was Joseph Laurence Alioto. Joes family married into the Cardonas with the marriage between my great great Aunt Tessie Incardona and her husband Thomas Caito Alioto was also indicted by the federal government on bribery charges after he was accused in 1969 by the State of Washington of splitting a $2.3 million fee in an antitrust case with Washington State Attorney General John OConnell. These charges were pressed by one of Nixons top men in the State of Washington, then Assistant U.S Attorney and subsequently a U.S. Senator, Slade Gorton. youtube/watch?v=3IBjk8FVLj8
Posted on: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:48:29 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015