Cheers Doone Sonofdoone here a good easy to comprehend explaination of the legal person/ jurastic person / birth extract I found hope it helps those with confusion around this subject ---- I did not author this Part of the compelled information is the name of the child, or fully extracted fetus. This name then becomes part of the information registered by the government and archived in its records which are maintained in the possession or control of the Registrar General of each province (see subsection 2(5); 5(2) of the Vital Statistics Act of Ontario). The parents and others are compelled under penalty of law to register the event of the birth of a child. In Ontario, in fact, the penalty is a fine of $50,000 for failure to do so (see subsection 55(1) of the Ontario Act). Therefore, we cannot accuse our parents of selling (registering) us into slavery. What they did was involuntary. The name thus registered is a product of the law and irrefutably is known as a legal name. It is doubtful that any legal person or court would ever deny that the name appearing on any Birth Certificate is a legal name. The definition of legal found in the Dictionary of Canadian Law is “According to law, lawful.” Therefore, since the law compels the name be provided to it for registration by it, then it is a legal name. The act of Registration is the act of securing rights in the property, in this case the legal name, to the Registrant,. The Statement of Birth (SOB) is archived with, and in the possession or control of the Registrar General of the province and it was the government’s intention that this be so. Therefore, the law has been fulfilled and the government is the legal title holder of the legal name. Possession is nine tenths of the law, as the old cliché goes. The other one tenth is intent, often referred to as men rea. There is no doubt the government is legal title holder of the legal name and intended to be so. A legal person, according to part of the definition of person found in the Dictionary of Canadian Law is; “A legal person is anything to which the law gives a legal or fictional existence or personality, with capacity for rights and duties…” Therefore, the legal name is a legal person and all statute law states within it that it applies to persons. Statute law assigns rights and duties to persons, not men and women. The law can only do that to its own creations, it cannot grant anything to men and women, only to persons, which are creations of the law. I like the phrase I once heard a man use. He said, I am not a person, but I have a person (referring to the legal name that appears on the Birth Certificate in his possession and control). A useful way of understanding what is going on in the system of commerce with the legal name is to view the legal name as a ship. In the system of commerce, everything has to be registered in the legal name or placed in the ship. As we accumulate significant property (things such as food, etc. do not need to be recorded and placed on the ship), it is recorded (registered) and placed on the ship (registered in the legal name). The legal title holder in the name (legal name) also has legal title in the property registered (place in the ship) in the legal name as well. Bottom line is that we the people do not hold title in anything. The government, the title holder in the “ROB” or “SOB” as the case may be, holds title in everything. Since the title holder holds title, what are we doing paying, a commercial activity that we had no business being involved in anyway? We can readily see why the system of commerce, with its money and statue laws, is truly the root of all our problems. Once the title holder in the legal name has been identified, then we have identified the party that the law will hold responsible for the financial, legal and other obligations of the legal name (property). The alternative, I might suggest, is to demand (demand means claim) the “SOB” be given to us since it is the title document for the legal name and once in our possession, it will belong to us and within our control. If any other party uses the name without our permission, then that will constitute a trespass and is legally actionable. For greater legal leverage, one might consider trade marking the legal name once it is in our control, thus making it easier to take legal action against anyone using the name without our permission. these last two paragraphs having being proved wrong as the sur name /nom de geurre/ name of war is claimed under copyright by the crown/state we are not informed of this under the maxim -- let those that be deceived , be deceived -- and therefore infringe/steal that copyrighted name which is why we are licensed to do licentiuos behavior or that which would otherwise be unlawful ----- hope that helped in figuring out one of the hard parts of the scam to figure --- the royal scam
Posted on: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:06:18 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015