Clear evidence of why he is the false Dalai Lama. In Riga,Latvia on Tuesday May 6 2014 he said this about his own guru, Kyabje Trijang Rinpoche: “My tutor Trijang Rinpoche and his teacher Phabongka Rinpoche, who also relied on Shugden, did not see him as a refuge, so they did not place him in the refuge tree.” Here is the link for the full article: einnews/pr_news/203561143/second-day-of-his-holiness-the-dalai-lama-s-teachings-in-riga-latvia This is a lie. Below is the proof from Trijang Rinpoche’s own words. An extract from Kyabje Trijang Rinpoche’s famous work “Music Delighting an Ocean of Conquerors” which is entirely devoted to showing how Dorje Shugden. From pgs 7-9 of the manuscript. “Likewise, in regard to this very Dharma protector, Emanated Gyalchen Dorje Shugden, in Expression of the Names of Manjusri, it says, Glorious illuminator of all forms! Holder of all reflections! Thus, although he can appear in any mundane or supra‐mundane form whatsoever depending upon whether our mind is pure or impure, in actuality he is Venerable Manjusri of non‐dual wisdom mandala that is the appearance of purified aggregates, elements, and sources of consciousness, showing himself as a miraculously powerful worldly protector. WRONG ASSERTIONS Not understanding such important points, some, who have fallen under the influence of the demon of partisanship, think and say that this supreme deity, the great emanated Dharmapala, is no different than an ordinary gyalpo or tsen spirit who has an inferior form as a result of being a monk or lay person who died with bad karma. Leave aside relying upon him as a protector, they even deride others who do so. There are some, indeed, who echo such claims knowing nothing about it. Yet all this talk is nothing but babbling speculation. Why? Because this great guardian of the teachings is well known to be the precious supreme emanation from Drepung monasterys upper house, Dragpa Gyaltsen, arising in a wrathful aspect. The proof is unmistaken. Tulku Dragpa Gyaltsen, as is taught in the lineage, was the final birth in a reincarnation lineage that included the mahasiddha Birwapa, the great Kashmiri pandit Shakya Shri, the omniscient Buton, Dultzin Dragpa Gyaltsen, Panchen Sonam Dragpa, and so forth; this is proven by valid scriptural quotation and reasoning. These great beings, from a definitive point of view, were already fully enlightened and, even to common appearances, every one of them was a holy being that attained high states of realization. What worse karma could there be than denying this and asserting that he was reborn in the preta realm? Therefore, for holy beings it is not at all farfetched that they might show themselves in a wrathful form out of the power of compassion and prayer for the sake of a special purpose, and it should be recognized that they are emanations of Buddhas inconceivable secret qualities. But for them to take birth as a sky‐wandering preta through the force of negative throwing karma like an ordinary preta would be utterly impossible. To say it were possible would be to deny the validity of the natural law of cause and effect. Why? From the definitive point of view those holy beings are fully enlightened. Moreover, even from the common point of view, they attained high states of realization in reliance upon guarding their moral discipline as they would their eyes, from youth onwards throughout their lives. To say that a causal factor of pure ethical discipline could result in rebirth in a lower realm of existence would be to assert that actions performed could be wasted; that one could experience the results of actions not performed by oneself; and that such scriptural statements as From generosity, wealth, from ethics, happiness are invalid, and so forth. As a consequence, one would be turning ones back on Buddhas teachings as a whole. Furthermore, the definitive point of view, that these holy beings were already fully enlightened innumerable ages ago, is clear if one examines the accounts of their lives, and if one were to say that a fully enlightened being could take birth as an ordinary gyalpo or tsen spirit, then one would be asserting that degeneration is possible from the state of full enlightenment or that someone could be both fully enlightened and an ordinary preta at the same time! Or else one would have to say that the accounts of those great beings lives are worthless. A mountain of absurd consequences, previously non‐existent distorted ideas, would have to be accepted. If someone were to think that it would be impossible for those great beings who had already attained enlightenment to transform into the aspect of a worldly spirit, although it is certainly true that it would be impossible for them to take birth in that form through the force of karma and delusion, it is possible for them to emanate in that form through the power of compassion and prayer for a special purpose, and such emanations definitely do exist.” This is the view of Trijang Rinpoche regarding Dorje Shugden. He clearly sees him as a Buddha and a refuge. So why is this false Dalai Lama lying so blatantly? Does he think we are uneducated and cannot think for ourselves? Really, how can he even be said to be a monk with lies like this repeated knowingly for so often?
Posted on: Thu, 08 May 2014 00:24:50 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015