Crimea: Mr Putins imperial act| Editorial The historic - TopicsExpress



          

Crimea: Mr Putins imperial act| Editorial The historic atrocities in Crimea were committed by Moscow, which slaughtered tens of thousands of Tatars So it has happened. Crimea has been annexed. A strutting Russian president sealed the fate of the once-autonomous Ukrainian republic with a speech to parliament yesterday in which he sought to wrap himself and the Black Sea peninsula together in the flag of his country. It was a bravura performance from Mr Putin, largely free of the ad hoc ramblings he indulged in at his press conference on 4 March, but nevertheless filled with purple rhetoric. Without apparent irony he invoked his namesake St Vladimir in Russias cause. It was in Crimea, Mr Putin said, that Vladimir, the Grand Duke of Kieff and All Russia, acquired the Orthodox Christian roots that would spread throughout Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. It was in Crimea that the noble Russian soldiers lay in graves dating back to the 1700s. It was Crimea that had given birth to Russias Black Sea navy, a symbol of Moscows glory. In his peoples hearts and minds, he said, Crimea had always been a part of Russia. Quite how, then, his dimwitted predecessor Nikita Khrushchev had managed to hand it to Ukraine in 1954 was unclear, but that act had been a breach of any constitutional norm and could thereby be ignored. And by the way, Mr Putin intimated, Moscow had only failed to raise the issue of Crimeas sovereignty during previous negotiations with Ukraine because it hadnt wanted to offend its friendly neighbour. Now the west had cheated on a range of issues – Natos expansion into eastern Europe, the coup in Kiev, the unnecessary prolonging of discussions over visa waivers for Europe – Russia felt inclined to accept a willing Crimea back into the fold. So the self-justifications went on. There have been few clearer-eyed critics of Soviet-era propaganda than Milan Kundera, who once wrote that The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting. Watching members of the Duma wildly applaud Mr Putin, the phrase felt newly appropriate. In the modern struggle of memory, we should recall that when Mr Putin was asked two weeks ago if he considered that Crimea might join Russia, he replied No, we do not. We should recall his assertion that the troops without insignia on Crimeas streets could have bought their Russian uniforms in local shops. And we should remember Kosovo. Mr Putin made much of the parallel between Kosovos secession from Serbia and Russian actions in Crimea. In fact the differences between the two cases are stark. In Kosovo in the 1990s, a majority ethnic Albanian population was being persecuted by the government of Slobodan Milosevic. The regions autonomy had been revoked, ethnic Albanians had been ousted from government jobs, their language had been repressed, their newspapers shut, and they had been excluded from schools and universities. By late 1998, Mr Milosevics ethnic cleansing was reaching a climax: Serbian army and police units were terrorising and massacring groups of Albanians in an outright attempt to drive them out. The Kosovans plight was the subject of intense diplomacy, which was rebuffed by Mr Milosevics government. In Crimea, by contrast, despite Mr Putins characterisation of the emergency government in Kiev as anti-Semites, fascists and Russophobes whose tools are terror, killings and pogroms, there have been no pogroms, little terror, no persecutions of Russian-speaking citizens bar a bid, now dropped, to rescind Russians status as an official language. The historic atrocities in Crimea were committed by Moscow, which starved and slaughtered tens of thousands Crimean Tatars in the 1920s, before deporting them en masse in 1944. Almost half the deportees died from malnutrition and disease. As Moscow takes a historic bite of Ukraine, Mr Putin would rather the world misremember Kosovo, or discuss the legality of the US-led invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan. The world has debated those wars before and should do so again. Today, let us see Russias move for what it is: an illegal, neo-imperialist act. Ukraine Vladimir Putin Russia Europe Nato Editorial theguardian © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Posted on: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 22:29:54 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015