Dear Dr. Quinn, @ Pat Quinn, my feet were cold last night as I slept outside because my home as of yet hasnt been unboarded and it snowed and one of the letters inferencing the offense of the State has your name written upon it. Because the club I was within was only open until 3, and I am without a phone, cell or internet at 3838, as vis a vis witness for and against a State , EVIDENCED and in writing and upon the records of the Federal and State, extemity evidenced and engraved into the formal record of the court for all to see , for alll of eternity. External to entity counsel unredirected of the State, human resources, counsel, courts, with a State implemented Stay and the external to entity counsle having had been contacted of the State and was yet unredirected to mediation and retaliation, unsanctioned and unfined of the State EVIDENCED and in writing and unredirected too of the academic entity, with the academic entity having had unredirected either the counsel , the courts or State or EEOC and with legislation enact, please infer to previous posts.. to object or fail to respond to an eeoc request to mediate within an eeoc case of retaliation with retaliation evidenced of the hand of the human resources and to had been unfined and unsanctioned too of the State with whistleblowing employee of a State entity and HLC seat as10 cv 7917 and ABR 0913617 filee as vis a vis witness, for and against a State. To be an employee of an eoc, to dually file with an EEOC and State Department, the eoc only hads 8-9 categories, THEY check the box of appropriate for the filee, for them to have allowed the State to say lack of substantive evidence for and HLC, academic entity to be unrecognate of their own hand having highlighted the retaliation with the eeoc unrecognate unredirected too of the HLC academic entity , with external to entity counsle filed into the case having had contacted the State in a Federal Court case and the Stae hKNEW mediation hadnt occurred and might not have recognized retaliation evidenced supposing to have been redirected too of the academic entity per requirement of HLC criteria , with me as a HLC seat with me as vis a vis. The external to entity counsel didnt redirect to retaliation and wasnt directed of the STATE department of human rights TOO REDIRECT TO THE MEDIATION OR THE RETALIATION, EVIDENCED AND ENTERED INTO THE FORMAL RECORD OF FEDERAL, PER THE FILEE rather than the counsel AND THE STATE MADE NO EFFOT TO HALT THE PROCEEDINGS WITH A RESPONSE LETTER PER THE REQUEST OF THE FILEE DICTATING THAT THE DEPARTMENT WOULD INVESTIGATE, AS THE REQUESTOR AND GRANTEE OF THE COURT ORDER, I BEGAN TO HAVE TO OVERSEE MY OWN PERFECTED BECAUSE AT THE JUNCTURE WHEN THE DEPARTMENT THAT WAS REQUESTED TO ENDEAVOR THE INVESTIGATIONS, OBLIGATED OF THE STATE TO REDIRECT TO MEDIATION AND RETALIATION AND VISIBLY DIDNT REDIRECT TO MEDIATION AND RETALIATION EVIDENCED, IN WRITING AND IN THEIR ABILITY TO HALT THE PROCEEDING, OF WHICH THEY VISIBLY DID NOT DO AND WITH ME AS VIS A VIS WITNESS AND WITH THEM HAVING HAD IMPLEMENTED A STAY, I BECAME CONCERNED FOR THE JUDGE AND THE ENTITY, THINGS SUCH AS THIS CAUSE DEATHS AND VERY FRIVOLOUSLY SO, I KNOW THE HLC DOES NOT ALLOW EXTERNAL TO ENTITY COUNSEL FOR RETALIATION AND EEOC CASES IF THE COUNSEL ISNT COGNIZANT OF MEDIATION AND RETALIATION EVIDENCED, AND I AM VIS A VIS THE COUNSEL HAD THEY BEEN COGNIZANT OR UNCOGNIZANT WASNT DIRECTED OF THE STATE IN THE DIRECTION OF APPROPRIATE, WITH THEM HAVING HAD VERY VISIBLY ENDEAVORED COMMUNIQUE TO AND WITH THE STATE IN MULTIPLE INSTANCES AND NEITHER DID THE STATE OR EEOC IMPLEMENT EITHER SANCTION OR FINE TO THE COUNSEL.AND THE COUNSEL SHOULD HAVE AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF ONE OF OUR MULTINATION ENTITIES AS WAS I, SHOULD HAVE IDEALLY REDIRECTED THE STATE,TO THAT SANCTION AND THAT FINE. WITH ME AS VIS A VIS WHEN AN ACADEMIC ENTITY IS FUNDED OF THE STATE. THE STATE, IS THE STATE IS THE STATE, ALL STATES OPERATE OFF SANCTIONS , FINES AND TAXES., THUS HIS VERY FEE WAS THE RESULT OF SOME FINE OR LEVY IN THE FIRST PLACE. WHEN ONE REDIRECTS TO FINES AND SANCTIONS, ITS AN EQUIVOCATE OF PAYING ONES SELF,, e.g. looking out for ones selfs salary. and why would not one ,, do thi. *puzzling. , YET EVEN IF AN EXCEPTION WERE ALLOWED FOR COUNSEL, TO OBTAIN ONE FOR AN EEOC CASE OF RETALIATION, THAT WAS UNRECOGNATE OF RETALIATION OR MEDIATION OR THE RELEVANCE OF STATE REDIRECT TO THE PROCESSES IN TOTALITY AS AN OBLIGATION TO THE STATE, SUMMATING: THE STATE DIVIDENDS THE ENTITY AND THUS WHY WOULD NOT THE STATE REDIRECT THE ENTITY AND THE ENTITY THE STATE, WHEN AND IF ONE WERE WITHIN A SITUATION SUCH AS THIS. WITH RETALIATION HAVING HAD BEEN EVIDENCED TO ME AS THE WRITE UP WAS BEING HANDED TO ME WITHIN THE HUMAN RESOURCES WITH ME AS VIS A VIS AND WITH MY COGNITION OF THE HIRE , WITH ME AS VIS A VIS , AND WITH ME HAVING HAD STRINGENTLY ENDEAVORED REDIRECT OR EVEN IF IT WERENT ME, AS WOULD BE AN APPROPRIATE RELATIONSHIP BETWIXT AN ENTITY AND A STATE IN TOTALITY, E.G. THE ENTITY FUNDS THE STATE VIA THE PRUCHASE AND RENEWAL OF A LICENSE, THE STATE TAXES THE LICENSE AND USES THE TAX FROM THE PURCHASED OPERATIONAL LICENSE TO FUND THE SALARIES OF THE INDIVIDUALS EMPLOYED OF THE ENTITY AND SOME OF THE OPERATIONAL COSTS OF THE ENTITY, ETC...ETC.... and why would and entity of title vii and ix go external for counsel unrecognate or nredirective of this. WHEN AN ACADEMIC ENTITY, THE STATE IS SUPPOSED TO BE YOUR SIBLING AND ALLY, THUS ONE IS SUPPOSED TO BE RECOGNATE AND INSTINCTIVE AND REFLEXIVE AND THE COUNSEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN NEW, YET THE STATE IS NOT EVER NEW TO FINES AND SANCTIONS AND LEVYS, THE STATES UNREDIRECT PAIRED WITH THE CONCERN OF THE FINE AND SANCTION, WITHOUT THE REDIRECT OF THE COUNSEL , WITH THE COUNSEL HAVING HAD BEEN UNREDIRECTED OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES, WITH ME AS VIS A VIS , AND IT EQUATES WITH EXTREMITY SO IN PART IT ALLOWED TO A WIN FOR MY CASE AND THE RULING HAS TO BE REVISED, BECAUSELAWFULLY THE STATE SHOULD HAVE HALTED THE PROCEEDINGS AT THE MOMENT WHEN THEY DIRECTLY INFORMED ME OF THE STAY, AND REDIRECTED THE COUNSEL, AND REDIRECTED TO EEOC LITIGATES, AND REDIRECTED TO THE RETALIATION, AND REDIRECTED TO THE CHANGE OF THE CAUSE ON THE RECORD OF THE STATE AND REDIRECTED THE OBJECTION OF THE COUSEL TO THE FILING IN OF THE IDES, ..see, thats just far to many things unredirected of the State, with me as vis a vis. and so I was in the court room and I had said something to Lowe and I should not have had to do that and I had , had to do that yet then it involved him and then I said I have to protect him since I involved him so and he kknew of mediation and ides itenerarys and i knew of whistles so he can not ever lose his job since i am a whistler that wasnt summoned. that just, that with mediation and retaliation evidenced and the unredirected too of the State and the extremity EVIDENCED. nah... I gots to say somethin to someone. Extremity is default judgement for the plaintiff. The amount of individuals that were involved within this case, to allow the academic entity to try and deduce the instance into a roast or something military, with the manufacturing of a Federal court case of Bankruptcy and State umemploymeneeoc litigates, external to entity counsel unredirect too of the state, unfined AND unsanctioned of the State without external to entity counsel redirec too the applique of fine and sanction for their unredirect or them unredirecting a fine too the State for their unredirect. ...nah, i must STRINGENTLY seek efforts to maintain this case as civilian. retaliation, mediation, the itenerary, the change of cause on the record of the state, summons, and with evidence of communique indication State and Federal knowledge of the instances, EVIDENCED. thats just too many things unredirected too of the human resources, unfined and unsanction to of the Federal and State, and the one job in the hire and only two write ups on the itenerary and the itenerary didnt include the eeoc case and I vis a vis told Fuentes and told the State that I had filed an eeoc and hadnt heard back form them and then I had to go to township and food stamp offices and file a bankruptcy and go around looking for jobs because of manufactuted bankruptcy, unemployment, pauperism and extremity evidenced no, i am not gonna let even Pat Quinn get away with this.Were they suppposed to be, State mockings from the State or too the State or of the State to someone?.?. Because it doesnt change me as vis a vis witness and recipient of the communiques and correspondences. The evidence that there was a response from the appellate court , indicates the length of the timing of the unredirect of the human resources and the State, one to the other. and with me as vis a vis. and with me having had inquired of the State BEFORE the receipt of the letter of suit. Thus the State was supposed to appropriately intervene before the appelate phase, per the request of the investigation and AS EVIDENCED in THEIR letter written in THEIR HAND , and with Pat Quinns name unobscuredly placed upon the letter. AS EVIDENCED. cc: Emil Jones, Herb Kent, Serenity Groove International Online Radio, Taxpayer Advocate Service, Illinois Department of Employment Security - IDES, Secretary Arne Duncan, Barack Obama, JAY Z, Lil Wayne, Diddy, Rick Ross, Christopher D. Sims , James McHugh Construction Co, Pope Francis, Loyola University Chicago John Felice Rome Center, Loyola University Chicago, The University of Chicago, Jason Rhode, Ph.D., Andy Field, Bill Gates, Ford Motor Company, RadioShack, Rahm Emanuel, Facebook Engineering, Facebook Security, Skype, Twitter
Posted on: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:31:06 +0000