Demonstrating that the much abused Foley patent petition is really free verse - this is from page 4: Thereby the credo of both petitions is that eventually, This “ET proof” understanding of SPL precedents, i.e. its refined claim construction, Will become an indispensable part of any textbook about patent law And of the basic knowledge of any patent user – due to the enormous advantages it enables, – compared to the classical claim construction. But, this transition of the whole patent community from pre-to post-Mayo claim construction, will be finished much sooner or much later – depending on the degree to which – CAFC – and PTO – will support it – in the mean-time Such a deferral in achieving clarity and security About ET CIs’ patent protection May become a serious threat For the whole society’s innovativity And hence should be avoided.
Posted on: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:54:09 +0000