Do it or be taken prisoner, they barked at me. I was forced to piss in a bottle multiple times over: Citizenship Treason 14th Amendment Plus Section 3: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. – Like Bush’s Christain U.C.C. people chattel Parole Agent B. Murria entering my home, uninvited, and directly told me that her county-state colors of authority were “not my friend.” This Arnold S. Agent violently threatened to take me prisoner if I did not submit to her spitting on my 10th Amendment, my double jeopardy clause, superior order to be released in 2003, 4th Amendment protection against her-Arnold state breaking and entering into my home without a warrant and not in “hot pursuit”. These facts were witnessed by two or more: me, my aunt and cousin - on Friday the 13, 2006! Inalienable Rights Taken Is Treason (U.C.C. All Cap Name) Me, My Congress, “The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted. “ The Constitution defines treason as specific acts, namely levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. A contrast is therefore maintained with the English law, whereby a variety of crimes, including conspiring to kill the King or violating the Queen, were punishable as treason. In Ex Parte Bollman (1807), the Supreme Court ruled that there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war. Section Three also requires the testimony of two different witnesses on the same overt act, or a confession by the accused in open court, to convict for treason. This rule was derived from an older British law, the Treason Act 1695. In Cramer v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that every act, movement, deed, and word of the defendant charged to constitute treason must be supported by the testimony of two witnesses. In Haupt v. United States, however, the Supreme Court found that two witnesses are not required to prove intent; nor are two witnesses required to prove that an overt act is treasonable. The two witnesses, according to the decision, are only required to prove that the overt act actually occurred. Punishment for treason may not work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person so convicted. The descendants of someone convicted for treason could not, as they were under English law, be considered tainted by the treason of their ancestor. Furthermore, Congress may confiscate the property of traitors. The Defendants here are P.O. Anna Guzman, Ernesto Chin, Gerry Ames, Jody Bilgren, Bill Grinn (Lompoc, near Vandenberg Air Force Base) and Does 1-1000 – All State deserters U.C.C. money tax collection and keeping their S.S.# prison camp business at maximum capacity operators! https://youtube/watch?v=ZKJviTdrqzk
Posted on: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:22:20 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015