Doesnt work both ways, eh? Why should there be law subjectivism? If there are absolutes, then shouldnt they be applied in all places at all times? Why do some laws stop applying and are contained within imaginary boundary lines -- and others not? Why dont the political edicts, say, in San Francisco carry over to Los Angeles? Or the edicts from Oregon into California? Or the edicts from Saudi Arabia into Argentina? What is it that separates these important rules that supposedly keeps order for all the inhabitants of those areas, and why must they be obeyed or else state agents reserve for themselves this privilege to punish the violators? Whatever excuse you come up with as a reason that everyone in those areas must obey -- or else, have you ever stopped and wondered if the excuses you have been taught are, at least, not absolute and are actually questionable? Might be a question worth asking yourself, eh? #Agorist
Posted on: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:06:45 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015