“Dr, King was clear in his famous speech given in St. Louis; the protesters may be met with violence, but the violence must not be on the part of the protesters. One needs to ask; why did that change? When did it change?” Sadly, Blacks seem to have learned this behavior through lessons we have taught them: That any multi-racial altercation is automatically symptomatic of racism on the part of Whites involved, That Whites will respond to the accusation of such racism with guilt and remorse, That Whites will then falter in their enforcement of the Law, And that Blacks will then be free to riot and rob at will. (As an aside, note the number of people in New Orleans who went on looting rampages after Katrina overwhelmed law enforcement’s ability to respond.) Children go through a phase where they “test” their parent’s resolve to maintain control, and the urge to engage in this instinctive “testing” is not lost with age, but simply shelved as we learn (hopefully) that challenging authority doesn’t end well. Although “emancipated,” Blacks in America were still treated rather severely for the next century, with no show of weakness or remorse on the part of Whites who would oppress them. But after 1964, Whites have assumed a posture of appeasement that has invited “testing.” Dr. King was an enlightened activist with noble ethics and morality. Neither the White community nor the Black community shares such lofty values. Blacks are just behaving like children, and Whites are enabling that behavior.
Posted on: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:44:16 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015