Dr Zakir Naiks Fraud Exposed in Misusing Vedic Texts A lot of people have by now heard of Dr. Zakir Naik, and how he is working to convince as many people as possible by his arguments, or his use of his translations of Vedic texts, to become Muslims. And those who are not educated in their own culture, such as simple minded Hindus who have not really studied their own texts, become enamored by what he says. However, those who knowledgeable of those Vedic texts that Naik seems to use so well, they become frustrated that so many people take his mistranslations seriously. And that is what they are, they are often ridiculous mistranslations of Vedic texts used in a way to say Allah or Mohammed was predicted in the Vedic literature, or worse, that Kalki is actually Mohammed, so all Hindus should give up their faith and simply become Muslims. But you have to be educated to discern his frequent untruths to perceive how cunning he is and also how stupid he is in the way he misuses the Vedic texts to trick Hindus. But there is a reason for this, and apparently he is not as smart as he wants people to think he is, as explained below: Hari Om, Stephen Knapp Dr Zakir Naiks Fraud Exposed in Misusing Vedic Texts by Agniveer January 2010 While I have always been critical of his approach and conclusions, I always admired Dr Zakir Naiks sincerity and loyalty to Muslims. I was impressed by his gigantic efforts in studying thousands of pages of scriptures and selecting verses that could be used to derive whatever crazy interpretations he has derived to prove Muhammad in all world scriptures.I always used to wonder how he could gain all the time and energy to do so despite such a busy schedule of lecturing world around! But suddenly I came across a book Muhammad in World Scriptures by Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi written in 1936. And I was shocked to find that Dr Zakir Naik has done NOTHING MORE THAN simply copying-pasting from this book, mostly word-to-word and cooked up his own original research which he uses to claim that he is an expert in Comparative Religion. This is blatant plagiarization! And that too from a source that his followers consider worse than Kafirs. So all Dr Zakir Naik has done is copying from works of another person,memorizing those and claiming all the fame for himself! And he did this so writer or how he has backstabbed his followers in the process.Because Maulana Adbul Haque Vidyarthi was not an ordinary Muslim. On contrary, he belonged to a cult which almost the entire Muslim world,and especially the sects which believe in ideology of Dr Zakir Naik considers as non-Muslim. They are in fact banned in Pakistan and many other countries. Ask any Muslim scholar, and he would start hurling abuses on them for disgracing Islam and Muhammad.Yes, I am referring to the Ahmadiyya or Qadiyani cult. Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi was a disciple of its founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed who is considered worse than a Kafir by all Muslims who are fan of Dr Zakir Naik. The reasons why Muslims hate Ahmadiyyas and refuse to consider them as Muslims are because they hold certain beliefs that no Muslim and follower of Dr Zakir Naik would dare to agree. Some are as follows: a. Ahmadiyyas believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed was a Prophet or Messenger,and this is shirk - unpardonable sin as per Muslims b. Ahmadiyyas believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed continued to receive new revelations c. Ahmadiyyas believe Mirza Ghulam Ahmed to be a Messiah d. Ahmadiyyas believe that Ram, Krishna, Buddha, Ashoka and Guru Nanak were also Prophets e. Ahmadiyyas believe that Kalki Avatar would also be the final Prophet and most importantly, the founder of Ahmadiyya cult had hurled abuses and even cursed to Hell those who refused to believe in his prophethood! The concept of Avatar is a shirk as per Islam. All Islamic Madarsa teach books of Maulvi Md Ismail which specifically states that anyone believing in Avatars or further Prophets or Avatars as Prophets is doing shirk. Dr Zakir Naik knows all this - that is why in FAQ on Hinduism, he refused to accept that Vedas can be revelations. But he forgot that the material he has used to write other articles are directly lifted from Maulana Abdul Haques writings who agrees that Vedas are revelations. Thus proving Prophet in Vedas or Bhavishya Puran is fine with Ahmadiyyas because that is how they justify prophethood of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad also. But for all other Muslims, on whose faith popularity of Dr Zakir Naik rests, this is shirk.While these writings do not affect Hindus or even Buddhists, Christians etc much, they definitely backstab a devout Muslim. In summary, Dr Zakir Naik is guilty of : a. Copying directly, even word to word, from works of Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi, an Ahmadiyya without even quoting his references b. Using his own name instead to falsely proclaim that he is expert on comparative religion c. Cheating with other Muslims who consider Ahmadiyya and their beliefs to be worse than those of Kafirs d. Backstabbing his blind followers who quote his works without realizing that Dr Zakir Naik has made them a sacrificial goat at mercy of Qadianis/ hmadiyyas. e. Trying to prove Vedas and Puran contain revelations of Muhammad but also refusing to clear admit Vedas as revelations. Thus he has deliberately not made clear whether in reality Dr Zakir Naik is a Qadiyani or not. It seems obvious that Dr Zakir Naik is actually a Qadiyani/Ahmadiyya in disguise trying to fool common Muslims. But why does he need to put this disguise? is it because Ahmadiyyas are persecuted in all Muslim countries? Or is it that he is a spy with some other hidden agenda. Or perhaps, the way he claims to have discovered new researches in Quran that even Allah, Muhammad, Ali et al could not discover, he is laying foundation of his own Prophethood! Only Dr Zakir Naik knows what is the real truth and what is his true mission. But his backstabbing has left his blind followers nowhere. Either they will have to admit to Ahmadiyya beliefs, which is the complete foundation of his writings and research or regret their faith in Dr Zakir Naik being a Muslim. And as per Islamic Criminal Law, that Dr Zakir Naik is such a great fan of, he himself can decide what should be the most appropriate punishment for him. Sharia says that a thiefs hands should be chopped off. Hadiths say that one who deserts his faith or community should be killed. This is time to test how sincere are Dr Zakir Naik and Muslims who have followed him so far, to the teachings of their own divine texts!!
Posted on: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:45:57 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015