Duane Kirkland Sunday, May 12, 2013 Hines/comparative government What role should the state play in correcting market failure? A state abroad or at home should enhance the interdependence of states resources to correct its failed markets. Example any states who quits its business relations at home with its interdependent work force and abandons it social economic responsibility’s to the work force causes a failed market. youtube/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Moc7gwMJabM Example large corporations setting shop up in another country to cut cost on labor. Balance is the key role for corrections of a failed market, and in a study in a classical approach and investigation on what to do and how to correct the defects of a corporation or a whole economic society in production of goods going in and out. When big business leaves the work force and or social economic boundaries for its own self-interest causes market failed states for the institutions social economic ability’s. The state should play a role to enforce laws to help the whole interdependent society involved in the social economic trades among its boundaries. One way to fix it would be to enforce tough laws when a corporation fails it social economic responsibilities. The fact of the matter is no supporting elements of a business should leave and set shop up away to Benefit its self-interest. Failed to keep jobs at home or for ones institutions causes markets to fail. What is too much of a role? One key role would to be balance the regulated laws and to make sure that the laws do not bring harm on the impact of the social economy for the corporation or its supporting chain of command and its labor elements. It would be wise for the chain of command to not put a high demand for productions to cause stress on the interdependent work force dealing with the economic structure, it must be balanced to be productive in a safe environment. Also to not over regulate the freedom of economic exports and imports that the resources of each state produces its own economic control, in correlation to the corporations putting a burden on the work force with cheap wages or a unsafe working environment in the work force areas. Therefore it would be key factors to not enforce over regulated laws that impact the safe work environment. Where should the line be drawn on things like food stamps, unemployment insurance, health care, etc.? When an individual that gets laid off should be able to receive some assistance for a matter of time pertaining to the return of work- The way the current systems in the welfare states programs are a help to its society and it role in the market failed in a positive or negative way, but it comes down to the individual case workers who are supposed to investigate the facts that are written on a application. youtube/watch?v=9C313K-FFpw&feature=player_embedded Case workers should put efforts to find out if there is a fraudulent case or if the ones that are in need really are in need for food stamps and employment benefits. The positive outcome is the market is still operating when the individuals are still part of the social economic society by spending food stamps and also with employment insurance funds are still being a key element to society economic cycle. However the case workers allocating these clients and individuals needs based on family incomes can also be a negative by cases that are taken advantage of the welfare systems to benefits one’s self. There should be a fine line on how long the benefits last, some will extend it out and take advantage of the systems and cheat the system to a long period of time, and when someone is out of work for quite a while he or she can hurt the work history and be able to never find a job. The benefits should be no longer than six months with assistance, and one should be investigated if a red flag of wrong doing is in progress. It’s all about the public administration coming up with a way to enhance the ability of helping one return to work or even actually looking for work. youtube/watch?v=f0Vq40TP_gs&feature=player_embedded Overall the roles of corporations affect the roles of individuals who are part of a society in the economic market. When the y ends up losing work for over regulated laws or when a business leaves a boundary sector this plays a key role in the way employment and benefits are allocated.This impacts a market to the negative or positive impacts of how things are run by its institutions and its key elements of the administration ability to help and serve others. This could be an outcome of a failer of a market in correlation to society economic control. Video references youtube/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Moc7gwMJabM youtube/watch?v=9C313K-FFpw&feature=player_embedded youtube/watch?v=f0Vq40TP_gs&feature=player_embedded
Posted on: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 05:27:22 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015