EVOLUTION MUZZLES SCIENCE. I know thats a big statement. Im not saying this has anything to do with relgious reasons, so thats not my argument. At the bottom I posted a link of an interview with Mary Schweitzer, about her work. My point is not to use her example of muzzled work. Her work is recognized as legitimate science now. There two points I would like to make about this interview. 1. She mentioned that she afraid to tell anyone what she found. 2.Many people tried to discredit her work, that hadnt even seen the proof of her work. Why? Because it was a unbelievable find. This is not an argument for a young earth. The fact is Mary was afraid to show her work was because she knew she be ridiculed. My point is. What if she wasnt strong enough to show the world what she found? None of us would have ever known. You see, when people find things in science thats never been seen before, the get ridiculed, sometimes funding removed, or can be seen as no longer credible. The purpose of the video is to show you she felt that, and also to show that in the beginning, her work was ridiculed. Lets just say a scientist finds a modern human footprint, next to a dinosaur footprint, that is fossilized in one piece of stone. If the scientist is worried about being ridiculed, or losing his credibility, he may be to scared to bring it too the public eye. To say every scientist is as strong as mary, and would do the right thing, would be a complete blanket statement. Because of evolutions age limits, the scientist are trapped within that time frame. Because evolution has a time frame, it muzzles those, who fear to be, the laughing stock of the science community. 60 minutes clip. scientific community attack and deny dinosaur sof…: youtu.be/ji2cvuJ1mYg
Posted on: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 06:38:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015