FACT AND PUBLIC RECORD. NOW WHAT DO YOU THINK OF OUR 2ND AMENDMENT!?!?!? As, A Public Officer Occupies a Fiduciary Relationship to the Political Entity; *63C Am. Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, Section 247* “As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised in behalf of the government or of all American citizens who may need the intervention of the officer. [1]Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves. [2] That is, a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to level of government and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people, and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts. [3] And owes a fiduciary duty to the public, as American citizens. [4] It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual, Meaning, no less than the American citizens. [5] Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official who tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy. Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit-and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears [483 U.S. 372] in the statute. See United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d, 163, 168 (7th Cir1985) includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary tow. Article 1, section 9 of 1776 Constitution : No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. SUPREME COURT RULING: Police Have No Duty To Protect The General Public gunssavelives.net/.../supreme-court-ruling-police.../
Posted on: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:58:28 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015