FOR THE BENEFIT OF THOSE DEFENDING THE IKHWAAN Alhamdulillaah, Its discovered that there are some boys that still believe the Ikhwaanul Mufliseen are upon Salafiyyah, just because there are one or two of our (Salafi) scholars that say something good abouth founders of this deviant people (known as Ikhwaan). But wallaahi its so sad that its still unknown to these boys together with their teachers misleading them, that our (one or two) scholars that have once said something good the founders of Ikhwaan have already been corrected long ago, but how will they know when their teachers claiming Salafiyyah hide those essential Books from them so that the boys wont know the REAL manhajus-salaf. As we all know, their teachers still mingle with the likes of Okutagidi (who is a leader of mekondoro/zumura in Ilorin), the other Sufis and the hizbiyyoon (also known as the Ikhwaa), and you know if the boys know come to know that the ikhwaan are not upon salafiyyah Asiri ti tu niyen. Because these their teachers dont only sit with the Ikhwaan and the Sufis (in matters of Deen) but also invite them to deliver lectures for the ignorant Muslims. Subhaanallaah! And wallaahi we know how our salaf used to stay far away from all innovators, heres one narration on how our Salaf condemn and stay from the innovators: HOW THE SALAF DEAL WITH AHL AL-BIDAH Abu Uthmaan as-Saaboonee (d. 449H) - may Allaah have mercy upon him - said in Aqidah as-Salaf wa As.haabil-Hadeeth (p. 123): واتفقوا مع ذلك على القول بقهر أهل البدع، وإذلالهم وإخزائهم وابعادهم واقصائهم، والتباعد منهم ومن مصاحبتهم ومعاشرتهم، والتقرب إلى الله عز وجل بمجانبتهم ومهاجرتهم And along with that they [the Salaf who have passed before him] unanimously agreed with their saying about the Ahl ul-Bidah, that they should be subdued, humiliated and disgraced, banished and driven away. That [one must] keep away from them, from those who associate with them and from those who are intimate with them. And to seek nearness to Allaah by avoiding them and fleeing from them. And he also said (pp. 114-115): ويبغضون أهل البدع الذين أحدثوا في الدين ما ليس منه، ولا يحبونهم ولا يصحبونهم، ولا يسمعون كلامهم، ولا يجالسونهم ولا يجادلونهم في الدين، ولا يناظرونهم ويرون صون آذانهم عن سماع أباطيلهم التي إذا مرت بالآذان وقرت في القلوب ضرت، وجرت إليها الوساوس والخطرات الفاسدة. وفيه أنزل الله عز وجل قوله: وإذا رأيت الذين يخوضون في آياتنا فأعرض عنهم حتى يخوضوا في حديث غيره And they [Ahl us-Sunnah] hate the people of innovation who have introduced into the religion that which is not from it. They do not love them, nor do they accompany them, nor do they listen to their speech, nor do they sit with them, nor argue with them regarding the religion, and nor do they debate them. And they see that their ears should be guarded from listening to their falsehoods, those which if they pass by the ears and enter into the hearts, will harm (the hearts) and lead them to corrupt whisperings and thoughts. And it is regarding [all of this] that Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic, revealed His saying, And when you see those who engage in false conversation about our signs, stay away from them till they turn to another topic. (al-Anaam 6:68). Please if this is how the salafis are to treat the Mubtadioon, where did some boys some ignorant people see as salafi scholars see their own manhaj of siiting with the likes of Okutagidi, other Sufis, & the Ikhwaan??? As regards the ikhwaan, a book has been written to correct the mistake of those our scholars that once said something good about the founders (Sayyid qutub and Hasan banna) of Ikhwaan and then condemn these founders of Ikhwaanul Muslimeen. The Book is titled Baraaah Ulamaa il-Ummah Min Tazkiyah Ahl il-Bidah wal-Mudhammah,it has been writtensince like 09 fa,but their teachers will never mention that to them because they still love to mingle okutagidi and the rest of the innovators. The said book, after compilation and authorship was sent to Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan who checked over it and made recommendations, and also suggested an improvement to the title of the book. Then it was read by Imaam Muhammad bin Saalih al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah), who made his own written notes on the pre-print copy that was sent to him... We can click the link below to read more about the Book: Baraaah Ulamaa il-Ummah Min Tazkiyah Ahl il-Bidah wal-Mudhammah To the right is the cover for the second edition of Baraaah Ulamaa il-Ummah Min Tazkiyah Ahl il-Bidah wal-Mudhammah (The Innocence of the Scholars of the Ummah from the Commendation of the People of Innovation and Censure). This book was prepared by Isaam bin Abdullaah as-Sinaanee. It contains a refutation of the one who used the intercession of Shaykh Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah)for Sayyid Qutb as a proof for the adaalah (integrity) of Sayyid Qutb and commendation of his (Qutbs) manhaj, when it is not a proof at all. The book, after compilation and authorship was sent to Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan who checked over it and made recommendations, and also suggested an improvement to the title of the book. Then it was read by Imaam Muhammad bin Saalih al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah), who made his own written notes on the pre-print copy that was sent to him, and he also advised that the section titled The Salafi Manhaj, should be placed before The Qutubi Manhaj and not after it, unless the author had a specific reason for doing that. And images of these hand-written notes are included at the end of the book. We will be quoting from this book inshaaAllaah in this series. Both of these scholars endorsed the contents of this book and the purpose for which it was to be published and distributed. And the purpose is clearly outlined in the title of the book itself. Namely, to declare the Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah free and innocent (in particular Imaam Ibn Baaz, and the other scholars in general) of having made tazkiyah (i.e. given adaalah) to those who are from the people of innovation: In this case Sayyid Qutb, who aside from writing his commentary on the Quran upon an Asharite creed, added other great calamities, some of which are serious enough that they cannot really be excused by mere ignorance, such as accusing the Scribe of the Prophet (alayhis salaam) the Uncle of the Believers, Muawiyah - whose integrity is attested to by the Prophet himself - of treachery, deception and hypocrisy. And this book essentially sunk their ship, leaving them only the flotsam to hold onto thereafter, which is what they have been doing since then. Note: Whilst many of the biased-partisans use the word Madkhali as a derogatory phrase to attack one particular Scholar, everyone should realize that this is simply a cover and a veil. Their hatred and resentment goes way beyond just one particular scholar and it is towards the Scholars of the Sunnah in general for the the fact that the majority of them eventually spoke about Qutb specifically and the methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen in general, after the truth became clear to them. The word Madkhali is used in a derogatory way that simply represents this hatred, resentment and jealousy. These people dont have a group of scholars that represent the manhaj they are upon. They have isolated statements here and there from some Scholars in isolated issues by which they cause confusion, but certainly they cannot point to a group of known major scholars and say, Their manhaj in dawah is the same as our manhaj in dawah. By the way, Shaykh Ibn Jibreen who erred in defending Sayyid Qutb against those who refuted him has statements that contain refutations of these people. Be sure about that! Go and read this article and this article. So they have no Scholars guiding and leading them in their manhaj. And for this reason, they have to attack the truth with false labels in order to cut off the people from recognizing the overall broad methodologies that all of those scholars are united upon and which differ from the methodologies of the secular atheist Jews and Christians that Qutb and Bannaa innovated into the religion. Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaans Checking of the Book The author, Isaam bin Abdullaah as-Sinaanee, mentions on page 27 (2nd edition): Then I (also) thank the esteemed Shaykh, the Allaamah, Saalih al-Fawzaan (hafidhahullaah) for undertaking the reading of this Baraaah, and for his precious [written] comments upon it... [to the end] ... And here is the copy of the letter sent by the author to the Shaykh and the Shaykhs response, on the letter itself: And the author wrote to Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan saying: Then I (also) thank the esteemed Shaykh, the Allaamah, Saalih al-Fawzaan (hafidhahullaah) for undertaking the reading of this Baraaah, and for his precious [written] comments upon it... [to the end] ... ...these are some fataawaa that I added upon the treatise Baraaah Ulamaa il-Ummah min Tazkiyah Ahl il-Bidah wal-Mudhammah in handwritten script... and the brother Abdur-Rahmaan al-Aamir had submitted a deficient manuscript to you, so I wanted to show to you what has been [made] as an addition to it, may Allaah preserve you as a treasure for the people of Islaam and as a armour against the people of transgression, and may Allaah bless your actions and your life, and as-salaamu alaykum warahmatullaahiwabarakaatuh. Then the Shaykh sent the manuscript back with a written note on the same letter: Wa alaykum us-salaam warahmatullaahiwabarakaatuh, to proceed: I rad the enclosed papers, and I have some [written] comments upon them, I hope you observe them, may Allah grant you success. Saalih al-Fawzaan [signature], 25/2/1421H. This was to corroborate that the Shaykh checked the book. Now moving on to the subject, it is similar to what was said regarding Shaykh al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah)- see here - and the same can be said about Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan. Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan Affirms That there is a Qutbi Manhaj, That it is Deviant and that It is Other than the Salafi Manhaj and that They Can Never Meet and that The Distance Between them is Like that Between the East and West The author included a section regarding the difference between the Salafi Manhaj and the Qutbi Manhaj, and these are the relevant pages from the book(pp. 110-113, 2nd edition) And in the first edition they appear on pages 115-119. InshaaAllaah these can be translated as a separate article, but from the above, the following should be noted: 1.Shaykh al-Fawzaan read the book and agreed with it, showed acceptance of it, checked it and checked over his own fatwas in the book, and made suggested changes. 2. Shaykh al-Fawzaan corroborates the existence of a Qutbi Manhaj, that it is a world apart form the Salafi Manhaj, in the sense that between them both is the distance between the East and the West, and this is because the author, Isaam bin Abdullaah as-Sinaanee, introduced the section with the title, Two Ways That do Not Meet, How Different They Are, Between the East and the West, and then he titled The Qutbi Manhaj and then The Salafi Manhaj, so Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen corroborated all of that. 3. What he included under the section The Salafi Manhaj were clarifications from each of Imaam Ibn Baaz, Imaam al-Albaani and Imaam Ibn Uthaymeen, all of them clearing the lies against them regarding alleged advices they were supposed to have given to the people of Algeria in the fitnah there in the 90s, and they clarified that their advice was and is that they call to Allaah beginning with Tawheed, and not to fight against the authorities, and that to establish Islaam, they have to establish it in the people first, in reality. And those people who made these false allegations about them were the Qutbiyyah of Saudi Arabia - and that is the subject of another article. 4. What the author included under the section The Qutbi Manhaj is the Takfir of Sayyid Qutb of all Muslim societies, and his claim of the obligation of a worldwide revolution in toppling all authorities as a form of jihaad and to replace them with an Islamic government, and his call for every one in every country to this goal. Learn more about that manhaj here. 5. And it is clear from all of this that Shaykh al-Fawzaan corroborates the existence of the Qutbiyyah and the Qutbi Manhaj and this is not from the invention of the so called Madkhalis. As we said, the hatred of these people is for all of the Scholars, its not about Shaykh Rabee al-Madkhali, but the word Madkhali they use as a derogatory term is simply a veil through which they desire to attack the manhaj that all the Salafi Shaykhs were and are upon. Thats what their real problem is. It is apparent from all of the above that Shaykh al-Fawzaan would have to be considered - upon the language and understanding of the Takfiris and Qutbis - a Madkhali scholar, except that these people are too cowardly to express their denigration of the Shaykh in this manner, because then all people would know of their misguidance and fraud in claiming to be upon the Salafi aqidah and Salafi Manhaj. Their attempt at using the label Madkhali to deceive the people and to protect the grave-frequenting soofees, and Asharis who brought them their methodologies has come to its end walhamdulillaah, and it is clear that their outward attachment to the Salafi aqidah is only a means by which the aqidah of Sayyid Qutb (see here), and the methodologies of Qutb and Banna can be introduced to people in order to effect Leninist-type revolutions in the Muslim lands. In fact on their forums and blogs they explicitly state this, they dont even hide the fact that the ideologies and methodologies of secular atheist Jews are their chosen preferred method above and over the methodologies of the Prophets, and the sayings of Imaam Malik (rahimahullaah), The latter part of this Ummah will not be rectified except by that which rectified its earlier part. But alhamdulillaah,the Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah, by the end of the 1990s and the early 21st century, exposed these people and their wishes and desires crumbled, turning into gaseous matter. This is why these people have so much hatred, enmity and resentment, you can read it and see it in their actions. But to avoid people recognizing their corruption, they scapegoat just one Scholar, whereas in reality, their hate, anger and resentment is towards all the Scholars.
Posted on: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:27:03 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015