Final day of NEA-AHPETC trial: DPP Isaac Tan surmised that the town council was aware of the need for a permit, did not specifically object to NEA’s request to submit forms for the permit, did not heed NEA’s advice that no permit was granted, and instead continued with the fair to persistently flout the law. Ms Sylvia Lim said that AHPETC did not quibble with NEA about whether a permit was needed, because a town council is in no position to judge on that. “Whether a permit is required should be decided by a court of law, rather than between us and NEA,” she said. --------------------------------------------- Quote: Guo Xiongwei: Pls read this part & think abt it: **** If in any backward state, one may say it was an attempt by the State to PLANT FALSE ALLEGATIONS to criminalize a person. Questions shld have been raised (by either the judge or defendant lawyer) regarding the appropriate due diligence by the party putting up such (unfounded) *evidence*. Is it a lack of prepared work, due diligence or substandard work or even maliciousness?
Posted on: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:17:00 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015