From: John Cihon [mailto:johncihon@yahoo] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Makeup Dear Mr. Daniel, I then take it that your clients position is that they are not obligated to give me their vacation plans in advance, and only after the fact, as they did this year? Would they prefer that I ask the court to schedule a hearing for their numerous prior contempts and to clarify this issue, rather than let me spend one additional evening with my son? I await your constructive response. Sincerely, John J. Cihon From: [email protected] To: John Cihon Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 9:49 AM Subject: RE: Makeup Mr. Cihon: If they do not leave their home, I do not believe the court would define them vacation plans. Please enumerate the supposed contempts so we can answer that question. By the way, why dont you just ask the Scotts, instead of being belligerent? Do you want the 20th? Please confirm. David E. Daniel, Esquire DANIEL & KASBEE 999 West View Park Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15229 412-931-2340 [email protected] John Cihon Today at 7:03 PM To [email protected] Elizabeth Scott Dear Mr. Daniel, The issue is that your clients told me they were leaving their home and the state for their vacation. The current orders require them to inform me in writing as soon as possible if their plans change. They did not inform me, and I have several e-mails I sent to you, asking for clarification, when they were still in their home past the start of the date I was told they would be gone. When I asked my son about this, he told me he wasnt sure what they were doing. I did call, but your clients refused to speak to me or give me any further information. So, I had no idea where my son was or would be, based on incorrect information you gave me, which you and your clients deliberately refused to correct. I believe the court would agree that I had a right to be promptly supplied with this information. Not only do I have a record of the requests on my part for clarification from this summer, but your clients have repeated this pattern for the last several years, and absolutely refused to ever give me any updated information when their plans change. I have, of course, kept records of this. If you believe that the current orders allow your clients to change their plans and refuse to tell me, that is an issue that I would be happy to ask the court to clarify. I meant what I said before about not intending to take your clients to court for their numerous contempts, but, now that you are telling me they do not think the order that states they have to inform me in writing when their plans change applies to them and they are free to ignore it, I dont see as how I have much choice to take them to court to ensure compliant behavior in the future. After all, they have done this for several years, and I see no reason to think it will change, as they do it with your blessing. Of course, if I have to do this, it would make sense to ask for a hearing in regards to all their prior contempts and a partial custody hearing. If your clients would rather face that than give me my son for one additional evening to be done with the matter, that is their choice. I would sincerely prefer to resolve the matter outside a courtroom. As far as being belligerent, I think the court would consider your clients refusal to respond to repeated requests and phone calls to provide accurate information to be far more belligerent than anything I have done. I await your constructive reply. Sincerely, John J. Cihon
Posted on: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 23:11:55 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015