From my facebook page 2009-2010. Having found this blog entry by the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Lady_of_the_United_States *Comment from: Michelle Obama [Visitor] · obamaprincetonthesis.wordpress/ ”I posted my thesis in web-viewable format here: obamaprincetonthesis.wordpress/ ” Michelle Obama *[ nelsonguirado/index.php/asymmetric/2008/02/22/michelle-obama-s-princeton-thesis ] , studied it, written a relative as-it-happens ‘what does it mean’, some kind of auto-AUMing happened and ThisIsThatAUMingThankYou, dynamically speaking… I think it’s about collective ‘thought forms’—particularly over in and around Africa: their presence necessitates the experiencing and re-experiencing of so much burn/pain, continually and seemingly without beginning or end. There is some kind of coalescence in place with momentum. So, the job is not to stop the momentum, but, rather to initiate a new coalescence in collectively physical form. As continental persons are at once animating and are focused upon by others - extant or otherwise, and as that energetic focus specifically relates to intentions of a global healing, new thought forms will populate. In this way, it is not a push pull engagement; not a better than replacement. Evolution is gradual, can be gradual: with acceptance of what ‘needs’ to be done. One can be ‘wrong’, i.e., one can choose a way less dense manifest productivity-wise relative to a ‘righter’ or ‘more correct’ choice—yet those are retroactive categorizations. It’s All Good to the extent that we remain in motion and committed to creating our intention to heal ourselves, as evidenced by our manifest efforts being seemingly supported and nurtured without effort explicitly spent for that intention: for ourselves. Paradoxically, as we or one extends an effort for the greater, for a community of whatever size to be more fully functioning, the effort directly manifestly results in one’s own self-sustenance. Paradox because neither self nor other necessarily ‘wants’ to exist—and yet must for either to exist. Now, the energy which before was based in fear of death is shown to be and actually is in service to life for life. We must face death in order to face life; to the extent both are accepted, the ‘circle’ is actually manifestly ‘unbroken’. Energy becomes what is required to evoke the healing function of the planet inherent, as it cannot be else; for it is ever and only that which will evoke what is actually necessary. Prerequisite is the actual knowledge that one is inherently what and who one is and as such is actually manifestly unalterable by outside agency, whether either or both actor and acted upon ‘like it or not’. As this can be seen and known actually manifestly, free will becomes and is actually free—to be applied intuitively and as necessary in order to maintain a manifestly collective effort. A Relevant Moral Imperative Choosing for oneself is the moral imperative. Just as self-loathing is requisite for habitability by The Colonizer, choosing God - as in adopting an Ideal for which to strive, is requisite for inhabiting a Self—incorruptible by outside agency. The incorruptibility is as a function of organismal integrity. As the Ideal is committed to, as one devotes one’s energies to a reaching for that which cannot be grasped, one becomes and is un-colonizable—as then there is manifestly no room in the inn. The inn is in fact full when one has consciously chosen a God-Idea, an Ideal for which to strive with one’s life as manifest energetic effort, daily and moment-to-moment. Hopelessness serves to undermine to the extent that one has as yet to decide upon an Ideal. Left undesignated, that functional allotment, of one’s God-Idea motivation, will be assigned via outside agency. The colonizer surely fits that bill. Waiting invites an oppressor, functionally speaking. In this way, it can be seen, clearly and unequivocally, that the colonized in fact chooses to be colonized—or not; as waiting for the guest to arrive at the inn yields only either yet more waiting – self-oppression, or arrival of The Guest in the form of an artificial self-image: one in which the Self is a bystander, watching itself yield its formerly free will to the whims of that which it then believes it needs after having invested so much in the waiting. Hopelessness itself, as an entity, can then be seen as an emanation of frustration as one works for its chosen Ideal and yet does not see manifest fruit; or, alternatively, an emanation of waiting for that which may arrive and yet never actually ‘do’ anything save supply an unnecessary and artificially-induced false ‘need’. So why wait? Decide. Wait or choose. It is only as we, you or one does in fact, manifestly ‘give up’, that there does then become ‘room at the inn’. Choose to be colonized or choose to colonize oneself; but remember there’s a resultingly manifest difference....re-member that, always. Memory, whether personal or collective or both, is comprised of bones and I’m digging up bones: finding that hopelessness is akin to surrender. Even if the inn is full of naught save Peace, Love, Joy, Faith, and Hope, hopelessness is not necessarily an unwelcomed guest—simply an unnecessary one if we choose to choose rather than choosing to wait.
Posted on: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 23:12:53 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015