GDR: What is the study of Sacred Geometry and how does it affect the way we see our past, present and future? CW: First we should define Sacred Geometry. Sacred denotes something of a divine or holy nature and geometry is the combination of geo, meaning earth, with metry, meaning to measure or measurement. In other words, Sacred Geometry is the measurement of nature divine. It appears from all angles, that life as we know it plays out according to mathematical templates (ratios and proportions) embedded within nature herself, or rather, that what we experience as nature, is comprised of interwoven wave forms of self assembling and disassembling materia. Materia whose alchemical operations and interactions reveal patterns (from the latin ‘pater’ or father) that repeat throughout all perceivable scales of existence, from the, “sub-microscopic to the super galactic” as my teacher Randall Carson has described it. This “hidden architecture of creation”, serves as the template or blueprint through which the universal language of mathematics manifests into form. The systemized process of measuring reality, discerning these patterns and utilizing them to establish a harmonious rapport between elements of any art, scientific, philosophical, magical or religious work is part of the study of Sacred Geometry. As for how this realization modifies our perspective of time and history, I’d say it’s something akin to the key to the holy city. Cryptic utterances aside, Sacred Geometry is the most potent system for comprehending the great Mystery of life and the operating system upon which it runs. Therefore all that is, has been or could be, can be best understood through the modification to our perceptual lenses this knowledge provides. GDR: Does the concept of sacred geometry lead one to believing that the universe is an ordered construct, lending evidence to the existence of a creator, or is there more than one way to view it? CW: “A super-intelligence is the only good explanation of the origin of life and the complexity of nature’ – Anthony Flew “Rather than accept that fantastically small probability of life having arisen through the blind forces of nature, it seemed better to suppose that the origin of life was a deliberate intellectual act. By “better” I mean less likely to be wrong.” – Sir Fred Hoyle sacredgeometryinternational/camron-wiltshire-quest-gnosis
Posted on: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 04:10:48 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015