Gravity is Dark Energy and Dark Energy is Gravity I’m a poet that loves science, but with all the far-out theories out there I have begun to wonder, “What is the difference between a poet and a theoretical physicist?” Going by some of the theories out there, the difference is definitively not imagination or creativity; however, I do believe many physicist are practicing without a Poetic License. In my opinion Einstein did not blunder, he was prevented from including the energy density of space (cosmological constant) into the equation. A result of Edwin Hubble’s Doppler shift interpretations of Red-Shift observations; which gave us the expanding universe, which gave us the Big Bang, which gave us “what happen before Big Bang” which has led us to Unified Field Theory, String Theory, Quantum Gravity, M-Theory, etc… and not to mention Chaos (theory or fact). Gravity is the result of… not the cause, thus how could it be considered one of the four fundamental forces. That energy density, that Aether/Cosmological Constant/Dark Energy/ Quantum Vacuum/ Stress Energy Tensor is most likely that greater red-shift observed when viewing distance galaxies; and that negative/vacuum/repulsive energy’s momentum is converted by large masses of matter (or energy) into Gravity (i.e. redirected momentum angularly). This is why the bigger the planet, star or galaxy the faster the spin, as result of the increasing interaction with larger amounts of matter and repulsive Dark Energy is converted into angular momentum (gravity). It is also why matter and gravity appears to be missing, because gravity it has yet to be converted. This is also why most Quantum Field Theories predict a huge value for the quantum vacuum, and in fact assume that the Cosmological Constant is equivalent to the quantum vacuum. I’d say, as it accounts for 68.3% of the universe, Dark Energy is a prime candidate to be related to the quantum vacuum and the Cosmological Constant. The “attractive” force of Gravity is formed from the repulsive Dark Energy that permeates space. Large masses warp and curve space, creating a focused attractive gravitational field around a barycenter and or the center of mass, thus warping or curving the repulsive Dark Energy that is said to make up 68.3% of the universe. The fact that there is an Asteroid Belt and rings around Saturn and Jupiter tells me that the initial state of gravity is repulsive, until the mass of an object increases to a tipping-point creating a gravity well and a gravitational field. Without the repulsive nature of space solar systems and galaxies lifespans would be a fraction of what they are. Furthermore, how can “the greater the distance the greater the red-shift,” also be interpreted as “the greater the red-shift the faster the expansion of the universe?” I would hazard to guess that the universe is not expanding, but rather that Hubble’s observed greater red-shift is due to viewing through a greater distance, and thus, viewing through a greater amount of the repulsive Dark Energy. This would mean there would be an even greater red-shift when viewing empty space, if Dark Energy is or permeates Space; and at the same distance observe a lesser red-shift due to large masses of matter converting the repulsive energy into attractive Gravity. So, if correct should Dark Energy be considered one of the fundamental forces, and should we be searching for its’ force carrier, like we are searching for the Graviton? Would this mean that Gravity is not missing? Are Dark Energy, the Quantum Vacuum, Ether, the Cosmological Constant and Higgs Boson all the same and or related? Does anyone know of any “empty space” red-shift observations or studies? Does my thesis qualify me for a degree in theoretical physics? Answer: Theoretically maybe What is the difference between a poet and a theoretical physicist? Answer: A Poet License By the way Quantum Entanglement, Galactic Rotational Curves and Black Holes maybe related. Just a few thoughts I needed to put out there in the ether.
Posted on: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:04:13 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015