HISTORY OF HADITH The ulema themselves say that Bukhari’s text has not come down to us in a single uniform version, but exists in several ‘narrations’ (riwayat), of which the version handed down by al-Kushaymani (d.389) on the authority of Bukhari’s pupil al-Firabri is the one most frequently accepted by the ulema. This is called the “Ulema Shuffle” otherwise known as double-talk. In other words, they admit they do not have a single, written collection of hadith which they can say with certainty was written by Imam Bukhari. There is no such thing. What they have are bits and pieces of information that have been sorted and put together over a period of almost 600 years. And to them this has become the most authentic book after the book of Allah. The fact is, according to the ulema, Bukhari died in 256H, 245 years after the Prophet. Yet we are to believe that Bukhari was able to determine what the Prophet ate for buka puasa 245 years before? That is impossible. Here is a simple test. This is 2007. 245 years ago was 1762. How many people today even know their own great grandfather’s name who may have died less than 100 years ago? Do you know what your great grandfather ate for buka puasa - other than rice and sambal of course? Do you know your forefather’s name 245 years ago in 1762? This is impossible. The Bukhari collection is just 245 year old hearsay fake. There was 245 years between the Prophet and Bukhari. Then there is another 596 years after the death of Bukhari during which time no complete collection of Bukhari hadith existed. The first compilation of the Bukhari hadith took place 596 years after the death of Imam Bukhari - during the time period of the Sultans of Melaka in 852 AH (1430 AD) by another fellow called Ibnu Hajar Al Askalani. The ulema know this. They realize that they stand on lies. To cover one lie, they create a thousand more lies. To divert attention from the fact that Bukhari is not the author of a complete collection of the fake hadith that is attributed to him, the ulema say that at least seventy full commentaries, other than by Askalani, have been written on Imam al-Bukhari’s ‘great Sahih’. How this helps prove their case is best left to the ulema to shuffle. According to the ulema, the most celebrated of these commentaries is “without question the Fath al-Bari (‘Victory of the Creator’) by Imam Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, a work which was the crown both of its genre and of the Imam’s academic career. It is appreciated by the ulema for the doctrinal soundness of its author, for its complete coverage of Bukhari’s material, its mastery of the relevant Arabic sciences, the wisdom it shows in drawing lessons (fawa’id) from the hadiths it expounds, and its skill in resolving complex disputes over variant readings. For Bukhari’s text has not come down to us in a single uniform version, but exists in several ‘narrations’ (riwayat), of which the version handed down by al-Kushaymani (d.389) on the authority of Bukhari’s pupil al-Firabri is the one most frequently accepted by the ulema”. (see “Ibn Hajar Asqalani and his Commentary Fath al-Bari”). So, by the ulema’s own admission, their collection of fake Bukhari hadith is compiled from a ‘commentary’ on the subject by another fellow by the name of Ibnu Hajar Al Askalani. The real author of the Sahih Bukhari collection that is sold in the bookshops today is Ibnu Hajar Al Askalani, not Imam Bukhari. But this fellow Ibnu Hajar Askalani died in 852 AH, which is 596 years after Bukhari who died in 256 AH. The ulema confess that Bukhari never wrote down a complete book. There were no printing presses or photocopy machines or computers available in his time. And 596 years separated Ibnu Hajar from Bukhari. So how did Ibnu Hajar write a commentary about a book that never existed in one complete volume? To overcome gaps like these, the ulema say that Ibnu Hajar based his writing on the commentary of another fellow called al-Khushaymani who lived and died in 389 AH. So now it is actually a commentary of another commentary. By this trick they narrow the yawning gap to 463 years. 463 years separated Ibnu Hajar’s commentary and the commentary by al Khushaymani. But even the commentary of al Khushaymani did not exist in one volume or in one collection. And Khushaymani in turn is still separated from Bukhari by 133 years - another gap here. To fill this gap, the ulema call upon another fellow by the name of al Firabri (Muhammad ibn Yusuf ibn Matar al Firabri 231 – 320 AH) who they say was the missing link and source of the collection of fake hadith from Bukhari (died 256 AH) to Khushaymani (died 389 AH) to Ibnu Hajar (died 852 AH). The reader must carefully bear in mind that despite all these names and throughout this passage of 596 years between Bukhari and Ibnu Hajar, the ulema’s own evidence admits that there never was any complete collection of Bukhari hadith. There was and there is no such thing. The whole thing has been faked by the ulema. Obviously, the claim that Al Askalani wrote his commentary based on Kushaymani is a lie. Askalani never met Kushyamani. 463 years separated them and no one knows the authenticity of the records over 463 years. ------- During the time of Hazrat Umar, 100,000 copies of the Qur’an had been prepared and distributed far and wide. Was it that difficult for him and the companions to compile a collection of Hadith as well? No, not at all! With all of the Sahaba alive and well, it would have taken just one month. They did not do so because they always believed that the Qur’an was a sufficient guide. Since Allah and Rasool (S) had endorsed the Supreme Authority of the Qur’an, they could not even think of disobeying. Like the Prophet (S), the Sahaba Kiram also knew of the possibility of differences in narration. As the Prophet (S) commanded, Hazrat Abu Bakr burned his collection of 500 Ahadith (Tazkarah-tul-Haffaaz by Imam Zahabi).Following this lead, Hazrat Umar commanded the Sahaba to go home and return with their collections of Hadith. Then the entire stack was set ablaze. (Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d vol 5 pg140) He said, “There have been communities before you that wrote books of prophetic sayings. But then, they abandoned Divine Revelation and adhered to those man-made books. By God! I will not let this happen to the Kitabullah (Qur’an).” (Jaame’ Bayanil ‘Ilm by Hafiz Ibn Abdul Birr) So, how could it be that in the next two to four centuries, hundreds of thousands of Ahadith surfaced on the account of our Muhadditheen (Hadith collectors - Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Daud, Ibn Majah, Abur Rahman Nisaai, Musa Tirmizi, and the Shi’a Muhadditheen)?! Yet the supporters of these Imams fabricate their superhuman deeds to grant them credibility. To this day, many Muslims will have no reservation in believing a Hadith which defames the character of the Prophet. They have learned to not question the fallacies of the mullas and they accept assaults on the infallible character of the Prophet! - Ali bin Husain bin Ali used to pray 1,000 raka’t everyday! (Tazkarah Haffaz) This would not be possible, even if one stood in prayer 24 hours each day. - “Imam” Waqidi, a liar by consensus, claimed: Imam Maalik alone, transcribed 100,000 Ahadith. He learned from 900 teachers and by age 17 he was able to teach classes of Hadith. When the authenticity of MUWATTA (title of his compilation) was questioned, he suggested throwing it in water; if the water did not damage the writing, then that was to be taken as proof of its accuracy. Imam Maalik’s followers claim that indeed Muwatta was immersed in water and it remained unscathed. How much more gullible could one get?! (In fact, this is nothing but a frank forgery – Sheikh Abdul Muhsin bin Mullah Ali Al-Qari). - One day while teaching Hadith, a scorpion stung him 16 times but the Imam completed his class lessons before attending to it.(“Musaffa”, Shah Waliullah’s commentary on Muwatta) It is amazing to see that the noble companions insisted on removing all collections of Ahadith from circulation. In contrast, Bukhari followers proudly claim, “This (Bukhari) is the most accurate of books after Kitabullah.” Word of God asked us to stay away from things beside Quran when it comes to our deen. It would be stupid to go seek for such rulings from sources beside God, when God never demanded us to go look for such reports and follow them when it is He who has revealed a book fully detailed. To us He has given the book and we know that it is from God with the truth and we do not doubt. And we already know that the words are completed with truth and justice and there is no changing of it. The original Qur’an was written by the prophet (see 25:5) and arranged into its current arrangement before his death (see 16:101-102). Therefore, what was passed on was simply a copy of the original without any amendment, opinion, or interference. And they say: Fables of the men of old which he hath written down so that they are dictated to him morn and evening. [25:5] - notice: it does not say he had others to write them for him - but he has written. Say: The holy Spirit hath delivered it from thy Lord with truth, that it may confirm (the faith of) those who believe, and as guidance and good tidings for those who have surrendered (to Allah) .[16:101-102] Also: Last sermon, where as we know Prophet delivered final message and instructions, and where he says that he delivered the WHOLE message that Allah ordained him to deliver. This day I established for you your religion! - not a single mention of ANYTHING beside Quran and its laws! Notice as well that we HAVE origins of very old copies of Quran (In Turkey and in Uzbekistan), but no one has ever seen copies of any hadith, which supposedly were abundant and circulating among people. Why is it so? For 200 years! - NOT a SINGLE parchment or evidence of hadith! This alone should be already enough reason to understand that there were no hadith records for 200 years after the Prophet and sahaba. ========================================= The Six Collections that are said to be the utterance of the prophet but none of those who collected them was an Arab: they are all Persians. There was no written record of what was collected. The collections were made 200 years after the death of the prophet depending on what was verbally related by the people all around. Now all these Hadith writers came from Persia to write the hadiths although they were not commanded by Allah to write. They spent money on this project for traveling, staying in Saudi Arabia, for their lodging and boarding and many times they paid the narrators for their narrations. In a nutshell they PURCHASED THE NARRATIONS, but why did they do that, what was their motive behind it. DID ALLAH RUN OUT OF THE WORDS IN THE QURAN? 18:109 Say: If the sea were an inkwell for the words of my Lord, then the sea would run out before the words of my Lord run out; even if We were to bring another like it as an extension. 31:27 And if all the trees on the earth were made into pens, and the ocean were supplied by seven more oceans, the words of Allah would not run out. Allah is Noble, Wise. FULLY DETAILED (MUFASSALAN) 6:114 “Shall I seek other than Allah as a judge when He has sent down to you the Book fully detailed (mufa??alan)?” Those to whom We have given the Book know it is sent down from your Lord with the truth; so do not be of those who have doubt. WORD OF YOUR LORD HAS BEEN COMPLETED (WATAMMAT KALIMATU RABBIKA) 6:115 And the word of your Lord has been completed with truth and justice; there is no changing His words. He is the Hearer, the Knower. BEST EXPLANATION (AHSANA TAFSIRAN) 25:33 And for every example they come to you with, We bring you the truth and the best (a?sana) explanation (tafsiran). BEST HADITH (AHSANA HADITH) 39:23 Allah has sent down the best Hadith (Ahsana Hadith), a Book with similar passages which refer to each other. The skins of those who are concerned towards their Lord shiver from it, then their skins and their hearts soften up to the remembrance of Allah. Such is the guidance of Allah; He guides with it whoever He wills. And for whoever Allah misguides, then none can guide him. ALLAH PROHIBITED PROPHET TO ATTRIBUTE ANY SAYING TO HIM 69:43 A revelation from the Lord of the worlds. 69:44 And had he attributed anything falsely (Ba’da Aqawili) to Us. 69:45 We would have seized him by the right. 69:46 Then, We would have severed his life-line. 69:47 None of you would be able to prevent it. ALLAH SAID QURAN IS ENOUGH 45:6 These are the revelations of Allah, We recite them to you with the truth. So, in which Hadith after Allah and His revelations do they believe? 29:51 Is it not enough for them that We have sent down to you the Book that is being recited to them? In that is a mercy and a reminder for people who believe
Posted on: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:42:57 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015