HOW TO REMOTE VIEW (Non-Local Perception): When a remote viewer is at peace, generally stress free - most remote viewers perceive a target with the clarity of a light on a misty night. While there may be difficulty discerning the precise meaning and distance of a light under such conditions, there is nonetheless no doubt that a light is perceived. With experience and skill a remote viewer can perceive all sorts of detail relating to a target such as an experienced yachtsman upon seeing the light will be able to discern the outline of the coast nearby and the identify of the lighthouse that the light is shining from. But again, its not a high resolution image. Its not a bright visual image. Its a dim, misty, cloudy, obscured type of feeling. One feels the target as much as one perceives it visually. Infact, the term remote viewing is not entirely appropriate. The experience is not limited to visual pictures, although one does perceive visual pictures. All of the senses are active during the remote viewing process. More accurate is the term, remote perception. When one looks at an object, the light reflected off that object enters the eye, and an electro-chemical signal is generated, transmitted along the optic nerve, and displayed on a layer of cells in the brain. The brain then interprets this image to determine what is being seen. When someone remembers an object the remembered image of the object is also projected on that same layers of cells on in the brain. Now if you remember an object and visualize it while the eyes are open, looking at something else... then the same layer of cells in the brain contains two separate projected images. The image originating from the open eyes is the brightest, whereas the remembered image is relatively dim and somewhat translucent; since you can see through the translucent image to perceive the ocular originating image. For example, while looking at whatever you are looking at, now imagine in your own mind the remembered image of a pen - just remember what a pen looks like and look at it. As you are seeing the image of the pen in front of you with your eyes open - again, you are remembering this image - notice that you can see through that image of the pen, and of course you can see the ocular image - the image coming from the eyes. Thus the remembered image is more translucent than the ocular image. Well, the remote viewing image is different from both the remembered image and the ocular image. The remote viewing image is dimmer, foggier, fuzzier, and one has to feel the image as much as one visualizes it. Now the human subspace mind does not transmit bright high resolution images to the brain, and its actually a useful thing to know when youre training in scientific remote viewing; because if the student states that he or she receives a very clear image of a target, the image almost certainly originates from the viewers imagination, or perhaps from a memory, rather than from subspace. This does not mean the low resolution remote viewing experience is inferior to a visual experience based on eyesight. Remember all the senses, plus the sense of the subspace realm operate during the remote viewing process, thus it is actually possible to obtain a much higher quality collection of diverse and often penetrating data. A remote viewing experience is simply different from the physical experience of observation. A remote viewers contact with the target can be so intimate that sometimes a new term is used to describe the experience; that term is called bi-location. Often approximately halfway through a session, the viewer begins to feel that he or she is in two places at once. When this occurs, the rate at which the data are perceived is very fast, typically, and the viewer has to record as much as possible in a relatively short period of time. Phase 1: Establishes initial contact with the target. Sets up a pattern of data acquisition and exploration. The only phase that uses target co-ordinates (random numbers). Phase one essentially involves the drawing and decoding of an ideogram in order to determine the primitive descriptive characteristics of the target. Phase 2: Increases the viewer contact with the site. Information obtained in this phase employs all of the five senses; hearing, touch, sight, taste and smell. This phase also obtains initial magnitudes that are related to the targets dimensions. Phase 3: An initial sketch of the target. Phase 4: Target contact is more detailed, the subspace mind is allowed significant control in solving the remote viewing problem. Basically permitting the subspace mind to direct the flow of information to the conscious mind. Phase 5: Advanced procedures in basic SRV are done. The conscious mind participates more actively by working with some guided explorations of the target that would normally be potentially far too leading to be allowed in phase 4. Phase 5 included specialized procedures that can dramatically add to the productivity of a session. (For eg, one phase 5 procedure is a locational sketch in which the viewer locates a target in relation to some geographically defined area, such as the United States. This would be too leading for phase 4.) In SRV, we have to be aware of the types of information that were going to get. The initiation categorization of the types of RV data is based on the conditions under which we collect the data. There are six different types of RV data, and three distinguishing characteristics of these various types. 1. The first distinguishing characteristic is the amount of information the viewer has about the target prior to beginning the remote viewing session. 2. The second is whether or not the viewer is working with a person called a monitor. 3. The third is determined by HOW the target is chosen. TYPE 1: When a remote viewer conducts a session alone the conditions of data collection are referred to as solo. When the session is solo, that means the viewer is alone and is picking the target, thus has prior knowledge of the target. Knowing the target in advance is called, front-loading. Front-loading is rarely necessary and should be avoided in general, infact, at all costs. But rarely, sometimes, a viewer simply needs to know something about a known target and has no alternative, thus tries to do a session under type 1 conditions, but sessions are very difficult to practically conduct as the viewers conscious mind can more easily contaminate the data since the viewer may have preconceived notions of the target. Any findings are considered suspect. Attempts are made to corroborate the data with other data that are obtained under what we call, blind conditions. TYPE 2: When the target is selected at random from a pre-determined list of targets (by a computer or some human intermediary) and the viewer is solo; the viewer is conducting the session blind, without prior knowledge of the target. It is best under these conditions for the target pool of the pre-determined list to be rather large. TYPE 3: Data conducted under solo and blind conditions where the target is determined by someone else referred to as the tasker. Typically the viewer only receives the target co-ordinates from the tasker, and conducts the session solo. TYPE 4: When the monitor knows the target, the viewer does not, and only the target co-ordinates are communicated to the viewer. The monitor tells the viewer what to do, where to go, where to look, and it allows the viewer to almost totally disengage their analytic mental resources whilst the monitor does all of the analysis. Type 4 data is very useful from a research perspective as the monitor has the maximum information with which to direct the viewer. One of the troubles here is that advanced practitioners can be lead by the thoughts and reactions (such as a slight grunt, slight changes in breathing) of the monitor, which can contaminate the data. To eliminate these problems advanced monitoring sessions are normally conducted under double-blind conditions known as Type 5. Type 5: Both the viewer and the monitor are blind, and the target either comes from an outside source, or group, or pulled by a computer program from a list of targets. These sessions tend to be highly reliable. The disadvantages are such sessions do not allow the monitor to sort out the most useful information during the session. To address this limitation, sometimes scripts are used to guide the monitor in advance of the session with regard to what types of movement exercises or directions should be given to the viewer. These scripts contain no target identifying information, but do give clear instructions as to procedures. Type 6: Data which comes from sessions in which both the monitor and the viewer are front-loaded with the target information. This type of session was occasionally used when there were very few professionally trained viewers and monitors. Type 6 data is rarely, if ever, collected these days. https://youtube/watch?v=3xB0MSsl4yk
Posted on: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 09:38:21 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015